Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

The thought of 100s of church ladies trying to write him about choosing Christ and being saved, for some reason, I find funny. It seems to happen to a lot of prisoners, but since he is young and from a Christian background, he'll probably get more than average. A lot of church goers are going to see other members of their congregations youth in this guy, and it's going to get them writing.

How will he take it? Will he play pretend and go along with a Reformed Christian angle? Will it legitimately break him down, realizing he chose the wrong path? Will it get under his skin and make him even more angry at Christians?

I can't relate with this homo or any of his life choices, so I really do wonder. What happens next? Does he realize he's been groomed or double down?

Anyway, in accordance with Mutts Law, I must bring up that he should have a very nice time in prison, due to his appreciation of bulges.
I hope he goes for the cutting his dick off and "it's ma'am"s his way through his trial.
 
DISCORD'S NEXT! THEN WE'RE GOING AFTER HASAN!

1757953059495.webp
 
Depends on if he has a semi competent lawyer, at this stage he has no reason to confess and cooperate. Smart play is to hold out until can work out to take the death penalty off the table.
Yeah no they do not need a confession from him to charge him with the death penalty, his father, a pastor, and his boyfriend all say he did it with evidence to back up their statements. Robinson is just being stubborn because he wants to kill himself and because he doesn't want them to have a clear motive.
 
The thing I never got about it (and this whole let's kill kirk stuff), is that even if you think kirk is some crypto-fascist Christian nationlist, he's not the most obvious to kill. I mean Nick Fuentes would be the top of the list. And you know if he got killed many more people would go "he had it coming". What I never understand about these people, is that if you really want to destroy right-wing ideology (or frankly any ideology you believe is oppressive), wouldn't you just want to let them talk and eventually they'll talk themselves into a corner they can't get out of?
My opinion and anyone take it how you want but *they* don't want right-wing ideology destroyed, they'd rather have it around in a toothless, neutered version because if it's gone something else will take it's place. There's a saying that goes if you kill a king do it in front of his court which is what happened here, we in crystal clear 4k and thousands live in attendance got to see a man get a real life Mortal Kombat fatality inflicted on him to the screams of fear, confusion and terror of those present, if that picture doesn't send the message that these faggots don't care about the game and just want to flip the board over when the other side even so much as makes a move that'll let them win then I don't know what is.
 
The people blaming Israel for this are becoming as annoying as the ones celebrating Charlie's death, at least to me.
It'd be less annoying if it wasn't just low effort drive-by shit posts like "criticizes israel once. dies." They have no other information or observations other than posting the same thing that was posted 500 times before.

On the left it's suppose to be liberals want a color blind society where everyone is judged on their actions and accomplishments. I think this is what the non-racist right wants as well. It's the they/thems and the zoomers that see race and gender everywhere they look that's why the normies like me can't take it anymore there undoing everything.
You're going to have to confront disparities in performance between different groups sooner or later. The left's position is that these are all caused by institutional policies and oppression, and can only be counteracted by taking resources from white people and reallocating them. Yours is to just ignore it and hope it goes away.

more commonly someone in their camp shoots and kills them for not being right wing enough.
Can you give me one or two times this happened in the last 5 years? I genuinely cannot think of one, aside from maybe the guy who thought the feds were hacking into his dreams to control his thoughts.

Didn't Discord deny his use of the platform?
They said that one specific message wasn't shared on their platform. Discord wouldn't be able to say for sure that no messages were sent on their platform, right, that would be impossible unless they were told exactly what to look for.

But we're talking about a percentage of a percentage of a percentage. Most people don't need that.
I'd agree, but the solution isn't obvious. You should take a look at "Body integrity dysphoria" where people are obsessed with cutting off their limbs, like arms and legs. There's always been an ongoing struggle on if doctors are morally allowed to destroy a healthy body to satiate an unhealthy mind. Especially if they take their oaths seriously.

Experiencing recurring trauma due to the presence of his fingers on his hand, his determination grew to find a method to get rid of those fingers he perceived as intrusive, foreign, unwanted. He had contemplated asking a friend to watch over him and be prepared to call emergency services in case his attempt led to a need for resuscitation. Working in a sawmill, he considered building a small guillotine to cut his fingers. He was aware self‐harm wasn't a safe solution and could have repercussions on his relationships, reputation, and health. He couldn't imagine himself living for the years to come with those fingers.
Despite ethical concerns and limited literature on BIID, the decision to proceed with elective surgery was based on the patient's sustained desire, potential risks of self‐harm, and the distinct presentation involving two fingers rather than a complete limb. Following amputation, the patient experienced immediate relief, with nightmares ceasing, emotional distress subsiding, and improved functionality. This case highlights the potential efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with elective amputation in specific BIID presentations, shedding light on the unique challenges faced by affected individuals and emphasizing the importance of understanding, support, and inclusive healthcare practices.
 
FBI Director Kash Patel revealed new details about the investigation into the killing of Charlie Kirk, saying in an appearance on Fox News that the suspect's DNA was found on items near the murder scene and that the alleged shooter wrote messages about a plan to "take out" the conservative activist.

A groyper forged the messages and a groyper bioengineering lab planted the DNA. He will be charged tomorrow and more details will emerge.
 
>well ackshually we should keep him alive because existing in a cell is greater punishment than death
Nigger I don't want my tax dollars subsidizing this asswipe so he can spend the next 70 years biting his toenails in a metal box. Kill him ASAP so the cell space can be freed up for one of the six gorillion career criminals that keep getting released from jail because there's allegedly no room.
Funny how we were able to execute Timothy McVeigh within six years of allegedly bombing OKC.....big thunk moment
 
You're going to have to confront disparities in performance between different groups sooner or later. The left's position is that these are all caused by institutional policies and oppression, and can only be counteracted by taking resources from white people and reallocating them. Yours is to just ignore it and hope it goes away.
No you dont. That is a presupposition. Most disparities are caused by differing choices.

Hoping things go away or gust get worked out is actually a valid position in some instances especially larger cultural ones.

Action bias leads many people to default to "something must be done." This in turn incentivises politicians and other leaders to just be seen doing something even if what they do accomplishes nothing or even makes things worse. But people can say at least we tried something even if it made things worse.
 
My opinion and anyone take it how you want but *they* don't want right-wing ideology destroyed, they'd rather have it around in a toothless, neutered version because if it's gone something else will take it's place. There's a saying that goes if you kill a king do it in front of his court which is what happened here, we in crystal clear 4k and thousands live in attendance got to see a man get a real life Mortal Kombat fatality inflicted on him to the screams of fear, confusion and terror of those present, if that picture doesn't send the message that these faggots don't care about the game and just want to flip the board over when the other side even so much as makes a move that'll let them win then I don't know what is.
Yeah but many on the right want the same thing for the left.

I know this will be VERY unpopular. Look Charlie Kirk was not a member of the government, yet we're providing him all the honors that someone in government would get if they got assassinated. In many ways this is the same sort of thing like how the left did what George Floyd. Look you could agree with everything Charlie Kirk said, but the man does not deserve to have a flag flown in half mast when that's something that only happens when there's undeniably a national tragedy, or someone in the government dies. Charlie Kirk was a political figure and one not elected by the people. The Democrats don't agree with him and the Republicans like him. So you have half of the country that doesn't like him. Yet people are attacking people for not putting a flag at half mast or flagellating themselves over his death. I mean Christ, the thing that the Indian that runs the FBI said was over the fucking top and the man's corpse was transported on air force 2. At this point why don't we just put him on the fucking 20?

Look I understand this fear and the concern for people who promote and are giddy about this man's assassination, it's not right to promote the death of others because you simply disagree of their political view, especially when your political opposition was doing no more than just speaking. But this reaction is a little over the top. We all have to say that. The man was not a prophet. He was a normal man who had a political and social viewpoint that he was promoting. People are getting upset because flags are not being flown at half mast, and accusing random people of supporting kirks death. This is the same stuff that the left did with Floyd. We also should not allow our national symbols and traditions be used for political purposes regardless of what side they fall on. I understand if Congress passes a law or something (because that is the will of the people), but using taxpayer dollars to give someone you politically agree with what essentially is a state funeral will only cause problems. It turns our symbols and traditions into a partisan issue, and that creates fractures in society, which, if left unchecked, could lead to deep civil unrest/civil war.

You cannot allow this man's assassination to turn into what could amount to the right's version of George Floyd.

My issue comes when taxpayer funds are used to declare a status that the people did not appoint the person to. Look, if Vance wanted to use Trump's private plane, or his house (hell, even the house where the VP resides) to display the body or fly it to Arizona, that's his prerogative, but we should not be expected to follow his lead or admonished if we choose not to. We all got upset when the left attacked us for not "taking a knee" or being all pro-BLM, and we should not be upset when they do not want participate in our "pagentry." But when you make the "pagentry of the state" the "pagentry" you choose, you are taking core national symbols and acts and making them partisan; that action does not bring people together, it makes people think the state has been co-opted to push a particular political view. People accused the left of doing it whenever a black person gets shot (and the accusation isn't wrong), but I think we shouldn't even engage in any pageantry at all, especially at the taxpayers' dime.


Because I have to clarify, I am not saying that Kirk is the same as Floyd. Kirk did nothing wrong, Floyd was a criminal
Based on the replies people seem to think I was saying Kirk was like Floyd, which I wasn't. I was saying that the left turned Floyd into a ditey, we should not do the same, even though we agreed with Kirk. The fact that the left picked Floyd is their own moral failing. I don't know why people can't see this.
I'll make it simple: We should not be making ANYONE a christlike figure just because they stood for something we agreed on or we support them, let the left play that game, it makes them look stupid, we should not look stupid too.
Kirk shouldn't have been killed, and he died simply expressing his First Amendment right. I also agree with many points he made, but we should not make a national holiday out of his death or give him national honors, and I feel many politicians would be so happy to do that.
Why am I against that? Because the man was not elected by the people, and he was a political speaker. That's it.
It's the same house of thought why the left shouldn't be making floyd a national holiday. Except the values of the left are all fucked, so they think Floyd should have the same national outrage as a man getting killed for simply speaking/using his First Amendment right. I am outraged and disgusted and angry that Kirk was killed, but stuff like this and worse will be the end result if we continue down this path.
 
Última edición:
Look you could agree with everything Charlie Kirk said, but the man does not deserve to have a flag flown in half mast when that's something that only happens when there's undeniably a national tragedy, or someone in the government dies.
Im sorry, but this position is anachronistic. I am sympathetic as I too held this position, but we lost this argument decades ago. The flag is flown at half mast all the time for what feels like no reason at all. People are given honors for no reason other than regular pageantry.
 
You cannot allow this man's assassination to turn into the rights' version of George Floyd.
Agree. But should it be the right's Charlottesville? These leftists literally want you dead. Should they be held to the same standard we've been held to? If so they can't post these things and keep their respectable jobs.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo