Zoophiles aren't tipically considered part of the LGBT. So, more like 50% our fault.
So you're admitting that gays are guilty of perpetuating a virus that was dug up by a zoophile, even though they could all easily stop it if they wanted to. Not a good look, buddy.
Do you know what else wasn't a good look? When everyone went silent when pets owned by gays started getting infected by monkeypox decades later.
Optimistic as fuck. I've heard from the horses mouth homosexuals eagerly sharing how they liked being fucked in the ass with shitty assholes. Even if its only a few, ones who LIKE it like that aren't even the ones who DONT CARE about it, and considering how the body works, if you destroy your ass, and THEN take a shit it literally rubs the shit INTO the wound. Its really hard to avoid this.
You know, at one point, Danny Savage tried to coin Rick Santorum's surname as a slang term for a frothy mix of lube and fecal matter.
However anyone feels about Santorum, not only is it yet another example of homosexuals being very vicious, yucky individuals in response to anyone who offends or insults them, it's also an implicit admission that gays love poopy.
Idk from the sounds of it, it does sound like at least some kind of byproduct of engaging in homosexual activity. To say sodomy doesn't cause AIDS, just unprotected sex does sounds like saying incest doesn't cause deformed offspring, unprotected sex does.
Despite some people making the claim that condoms or other forms of protection don't protect against AIDS very effectively (because of microscopic holes in them or because they tear more easily inside of the anus), I really do think that is a moot point.
All this talk about "safe sex, we gotta push safe sex, etc." The failure to stop the spread of STIs amongst the LGBTQ community, by promoting "safe sex." It's not due to lack of trying. It's because they just plain don't give a shit.
You have to ask yourself, what is it about the LGBTQ lifestyle, the LGBTQ mindset, that makes people not even give a shit about STDs at all? After decades of trying to push "safe sex," why is it that they clearly don't give a shit about it, other than to whine about it when they get infected by such an easily preventable disease? Other than whining about it in order to fish for sympathy?
It really does seem that the only real form of "safe sex" there is is within the bounds of marriage. And that's especially when you factor in more than just STIs.