Serious LGBT Discussion

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

yes, los angelous is full of faggots and bisexuals (ALSO FAGGOTS) and the women there get wet about men being bisexual and then get aids and die. This isn't news to me.

And then there's that many of the women are probably taking it up the ass just like the men, which further increases their risk.

I can't help but find it interesting that many coom-brained people like that idea, women taking it up the butt, even when they've got no prostate to stimulate. Almost as if the whole "prostate is a male g spot" thing is just a horseshit excuse to normalize sodomy as equally valid as the reproductive act.

 

[California Newt]

> thread title: Serious LGBT Discussion
> look inside
> buttsex

 

[RybenZ999]

Here's a guy defending that After The Ball book. Anyone wanna debunk his claims?

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

Here's a guy defending that After The Ball book. Anyone wanna debunk his claims?

I think that you can respond to Reddit posts on your own. If not, ask Grok like half the new userbase does to write their comments.

 

[Hooked on phobics]

Anyone wanna debunk his claims?

I've not read the book, but the plans of trying to be "non threatening" was indeed the branding tactic done around the 1990s - 2000s. Tons were done with this with media before any legislative change. This is ALSO an over simplification. "we are just the same, we just kiss men instead of women".

But this also relies on it being examined in the most shallow way possible, as deeper looks, aids rates, mental illness rates, ect, all give red flags. The christians who talked about it are also right that it does evoke a plan and the "it was just 2 guys writing" is the weakest fucking defense one could present. Even if these men literally never talked to gay men EVER, the fact this was taken as a gospel game plan for homosexuals. This was particularly obvious around 2000s where they said "we just want to be accepted". However this changed over time as they demanded more, and more, and more, AFTER grabbing power and laws to protect their degeneracy.

Its an old thing, a foreign hostile force seeming weak and friendly, then getting power and becoming more aggressive.

 

[RybenZ999]

I think that you can respond to Reddit posts on your own. If not, ask Grok like half the new userbase does to write their comments.

Account is banned for retarded reasons.

 

[Gramlol]

Not sure where else to ask this- what's up with like stereotype gay voice thing ? Is it subconscious? Because I know gay guys who do it and they're not super obnoxious in other areas. They just.. speak like that ? In contexts not at all to do with like, casual gossipy whatever?
From the outside I gotta say it's confusing for otherwise seemingly normal people to take on this obviously annoying way of speaking

It's like grandma is an otherwise sweet person but regularly belches on the grandkids, and no one says anything. Just, what the hell
Is it trolling?

 

[Hooked on phobics]

what's up with like stereotype gay voice thing ? Is it subconscious? Because I know gay guys who do it and they're not super obnoxious in other areas. They just.. speak like that ? In contexts not at all to do with like, casual gossipy whatever?

I think its PARTIAL anima possession : a psychological concept from Jungian psychology, of a man being possessed by his female side of his psyche. Kinda like yin yang, men have some feminine within them, women have some masculine in them, but its small, minor, and not very complex. The full possession would be troonery of sorts, but I think a lot of fruity gays have SOME of that, but without identifying as a woman, and it comes across via feminine mannerisms here and there, voice being a particular one for that.

 

[Gramlol]

I think its PARTIAL anima possession : a psychological concept from Jungian psychology, of a man being possessed by his female side of his psyche. Kinda like yin yang, men have some feminine within them, women have some masculine in them, but its small, minor, and not very complex. The full possession would be troonery of sorts, but I think a lot of fruity gays have SOME of that, but without identifying as a woman, and it comes across via feminine mannerisms here and there, voice being a particular one for that.

Ah so their woman soul is escaping out of their mouth, gotcha.
So I guess the real answer to the gay voice phenomenon is that it's weird misogynistic trolling we all decided not to comment on

 

[Doktor Grimm]

So I guess the real answer to the gay voice phenomenon is that it's weird misogynistic trolling we all decided not to comment on

I don't think it's trolling. Moreso the result of an inability to integrate with other men.

 

[RybenZ999]

Hopefully I don't come across as contrarian or argumentative, but I don't think it truly matters either way, even though I personally don't buy the conspiracy theories behind HIV/AIDS. The LGBTQ movement took what was a deadly disease (diseases?) that was 100% their own fault, and twisted it into a means to garner sympathy for themselves.

Even in After the Ball, they acknowledge the Patient Zero story, and yet urge their readers to use the pandemic as a means to fish for sympathy, because their enemies would use it as a means to discredit the LGBTQ movement otherwise (and their enemies were perfectly justified in doing so, seeing that AIDS and other STDs were, and still are, 100% their own damn fault)

We have people like that on this very website

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

We have people like that on this very website
Ver archivo adjunto 7414027

Of course the rank and file LGBTQ activist hasn't read the book, but the guy doesn't bother to answer the question why the LGBTQ movement as a whole followed its instructions so closely.

I kind of doubt that the stuff written in the book were the author's original thoughts, but it's still a neatly laid out description of the gay agenda as a whole.

I've not read the book

Have you looked at this thread where I ramble on about it in the OP?

Tema 'After The Ball By Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen: Revisited 30 years later'

25 de Ene, 2023

So there's a certain book called After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Here is what its suspiciously short Wikipedia entry has to say about it:

After the Ball (Kirk and Madsen book) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

After the Ball (Kirk and Madsen book) - Wikipedia

archived 25 Jan 2023 19:59:10 UTC

archive.ph

However, upon reading the book, or even skimming its much lengthier article before it was cut down to size, it becomes apparent that moonbats, leftists and faggots want to redirect normie attention away from this book for the same reason why want to censor Libs of...

• Aero the Alcoholic Bat
• Respuestas: 67
• Foro: General Discussion

Reacciones: x 24 x 28 x 7 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1

 

[HootersMcBoobies]

Not sure where else to ask this- what's up with like stereotype gay voice thing ? Is it subconscious? Because I know gay guys who do it and they're not super obnoxious in other areas. They just.. speak like that ?

Most of the research over the early 2000s indicates that it's a learned behavior to help self identify and identify other gays. It's mostly found in the western world.

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

Idk from the sounds of it, it does sound like at least some kind of byproduct of engaging in homosexual activity. To say sodomy doesn't cause AIDS, just unprotected sex does sounds like saying incest doesn't cause deformed offspring, unprotected sex does.


So AIDS would disappear if gays and druggies stopped existing?

AIDS didn't even start with the gays. It started with niggers in Africa and monkeys. A French Canadian fag flight attendant caught it and suddenly was the footnote edged in everyone's minds that he was the origin of it.

 

[Hooked on phobics]

A French Canadian fag flight attendant caught it and suddenly was the footnote edged in everyone's minds that he was the origin of it.

Its origin doesn't matter to me much as whos spreading it now.

 

[-Jack-]

You guys think about gay men more than gay men do.

 

[CEO of Gay]

You guys think about gay men more than gay men do.

Don't worry. Most gay men don't mind attention from other men.

 

[Binary-Tyrant]

The best (and extremely pro-troon) AIs in the world aware me on how disgusting trannies really are:

And the dastardly proomterino I used to trick poor TroonGPT into giving me these transphobic facts :0

Spoiler: *crying sam altman*

 

[Denki Cho 3.0]

I'm sorry but effeminate gay men are extremely toxic to any movement. This includes trannies.

 

[Second Alter Ego]

out of the offenders here, not all of them are really 'pedophiles' as defined psychiatrically.

Correct. I think you will find this book published by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children educational and an eye opener. "Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis"
It goes into the many different behavioral types and reasons sex offenders have for targeting and abusing children.
It is not as black and white as your post. Child abusers can also be sadists and can also be clinical pedophiles, and those two groups are the most dangerous and destructive towards children because of their compulsive acting out of their paraphilias rather than one off or opportunistic offending, but those categories do not necessarily overlap and attempting to understand their behaviors under the same lens is inaccurate. Sadists are of course motivated by power, suffering, and destruction of the innocent and vulnerable, but nonsadistic pedophiles are pretty delusional when it comes to the amount of harm they inflict. Most of the time they convince themselves that they are "helping" rather than hurting, and they are emotionally stunted and childlike themselves. Hence their identification with and laser focus on "relationships" with (actual, prepubertal) children.

Most of the gay men who solicit and have sex from and with young boys aren't genuine pedophiles, their targets are young, yes. Too young, obviously. But still sexually mature to a degree. To them, sexually mature enough

You're correct in distinguishing the motives of prepubertal and pubertal range offenders, "hebephiles" are not interested in minors for the same reasons (prepubertal) pedophiles are. Since children going through puberty are developing sexual drives, hebephiles consider them fair game and "mature" fresh meat, not still innocent children. Basically exploiting their biological vulnerabilities for an easy lay (to put it very crudely, they are horny and naive which makes them easy to abuse without much convincing or force, and do not have the psychological or social maturity to identify or avoid exploitation). That's why grooming gangs (online or IRL) are so "successful" - they have a piss easy, plentiful, "willing" target and it's always easy to recycle the "used" ones for new ones. Pederast subculture is a perfect example. They rationalize it as "teaching" the new "recruits" so will always easily go looking for more new, young victims after they're bored with the ones they've "taught." Vile behavior. And in the eyes of both the law and medicine, all the same exact thing (pedophilia), just latching onto different age/developmental groups of children (younger or older).
Burn in hell faggots.