Why Most Transgender People Can't Have Nice Things

Destacado
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg dijo:
it was cheap and available when i needed it and did what i needed it to do. the engine was destroyed by contaminated gas and that was covered by insurance. I've moved into a 2016 Jeep Patriot with half the mileage.

that's very much what's been happening on the social networks. it's a different scene at community meetings, courtrooms, and legislative chambers. The right wingers are looking like they're the mentally ill ones while the queer kids and their families are looking like regular folks getting fucked over by crazies. LGBTQ+ candidates have been beating the crap out of anti-LGBT Republican incumbents since the 2018 election.

Prove it, Blake, you disturbed fucking vidiot dork.

I'd bet there are more truly monogamous same sex couples , than so called "traditional couples" who are actually monogamous. bunch of cheaters out there.

I've wondered about that. I've been lighting up haters for over 20 years. i can't even remember how many sites i was banned from. I'm thinking the person with the lowest reaction score in this virtual toilet has something to be proud of.
Presiona para expandir...
Nigger, you are a pedo. You fucked a minor. Kys
 
First and foremost, the people you see calling themselves transgender advocates on the social networks are just random individuals unqualified to speak for anybody but themselves with absolutely no stature within established advocacy organizations. You should be able to see pretty clearly from the tenor of my own writings on these topics and the opinions of the authors i share , that they are light years from those exceptional drama queens. the screed says demanding equal protection under the law is everybody's obligation as a citizen, but demanding special treatment is just being an asshole. For me, pragmatism always takes precedence over partisanship and principles always precede party.
Presiona para expandir...


I hope you realize the exact same type of argument - i.e., most people you see on social media do not represent the average person, can be applied to people that reject many things on the transgender agenda. It's a logical fallacy to bring up arguments such as this.

In simplest terms, the medical consensus is that sex is determined by what sort of gamete your gonads produce , gender identity is determined (as best they can tell) by a mosaic of brain structures and some people are simply mismatched between their sex and gender. Gender Identity is just as biological as your sex, but gender expression is a cultural construct and conditioning begins immediately. This is where the behavioral health issues start for transgender people; being bullied by their own parents and siblings into being something that they don't feel themselves to be. My brother and his friends lined up to give me my daily punches to make a man out of me.
Presiona para expandir...

I could pull a woke posture, ask you for sources on these definitions and then deem the sources as unreliable and provide you with my own sources and definitions, but for the sake of trying to actually try to debate I won't do that.

Everything can be seen as social construct. Let that sink for a moment. Laws, rules, or even something such as time (or the way we measure it) itself, are social constructs. Social constructs work because they provide individuals withing a society with guidance on how that society is supposed to work and what that society expects from them as members. And society expects you to act like the sex you were born with, because that's how nature works on Humans, as simple as that. Just read Schopenhauer's "The world as will and representation" and you might understand it - truth is what you believe (it applies to you the exact same way it applies to people that disagree with you.

With that being said, throughout history, every society had people who's gender didn't match the sex they were born with. And this was never a problem - until now. Why? Because, whether you like it or not, social constructs are based on the their underlying acceptance from the majority of the population and, while the majority of the population in the Western world probably doesn't care much about a guy that feels like a woman, they react against these concepts being pushed as indoctrination and as the "new normal", specially to their kids. I know I do.

Now, I can sense (and understand, up to a point) the incoming argument that trans people have to deal with bullying and lack acceptance by society. I get it, it's fucked up, but you need to look at the other letters on the LGBT alphabet for guidance. Gays and lesbians have always felt the same issues as Trans people, but they have somehow overcome them. If you look at television, social media, etc, it's filled with gays and lesbians, and most people don't care and just carry on with their lives. They had a long struggle for acceptance, but they were able to work their way through society norms, mostly due to the fact they don't reject who they are and they can still be functional members of society, even exhibiting "weird" traits. Most trans people can't do that.

The human society is based on hetero sexuality, because that's where its own existence as species and society relies. Anyone unable to understand this is rejecting what Humanity is all about. Can we evolve? Sure we can, and we should, but we should not compromise what makes us Humans.

Marxists argue that the nuclear family performs ideological functions for Capitalism – the family acts as a unit of consumption and teaches passive acceptance of hierarchy. It is also the institution through which the wealthy pass down their private property to their children, thus reproducing class inequality. Their take from this??? Family should be abolished. And what better way to abolish family than normalizing something other than hetero sexuality?

I don't have a problem with gays, lesbians, bisexuals, or whatever. But I do have a problem when the powers that be trying to impose a new social normative (construct) because they know that an individual without a family (or strong personal bonds) is easily manipulated.
 
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg dijo:
I have to question how a schmuck leftist corporal who isn't all that great a writer can gain so much influence and media access in such a short time. They don't interact with the public on their home page unless you're a friend.
Presiona para expandir...
Maybe they just prefer not to interact with pedophile child molesting dog rapists.
 
"Why Most Transgender People Can't Have Nice Things"

You can't have nice things because you're a retarded troon wannabe living in a one foot deep crust of filth, squander a hefty sum of money inherited to you, and because you fuck dogs and children.

Someone this filthy can't hope to have nice things Tom.
 
Malevolent Grimace dijo:
As a faggot myself, a colossal one even, I am happy that I have lived to see a time where my partner could get on my health insurance when the pandemic shut down half the world. But, I have been really thinking about the way the modern gay-rights movement allowed for the current gender lunacy to form. And part of me really feels that the creation of the gay identity, as a separate state of being, was a mistake. I could go on a long complex rant about why I think that it would have been possible in modern society to acknowledge that same-sex attraction and gender-variant behaviour is normal enough across human history and across the animal kingdom that pathologizing it was wrong, without "gay" and "queer" becoming the mess of identity politics it has evolved into. That, while it was never true that homosexuality was celebrated in the premodern world the way modern queer revisionism pretends it was, the grey area it existed in varied a lot more than modern societies would admit. So my pitch is that we should have aimed for assimilationism from the get go, and pushed back hard against the queers who got all offended at that idea.

I get why the movement redefined it as a gay identity as a separate category of humanity, as a cultural category which really comes out of the gay subculture of certain cities being spread across the entire country and world. It's an effective political organizing strategy. But I feel it sent the wrong message to society, the rested acceptance on this narrative of oppressions and victimhood that was very easy for other groups to take up, instead of trying to argue from a more evidence based point of view that could have rested on limiting government interference in private lives. Everything from furries to modern troons have used the playbook to worm their way into people's good graces, to various degrees of success. Its ironic because the first trans people, who got the landmark rulings in the 70's in the US that allowed for trans people to marry as their chosen gender, were essentially the most assimilationist. They chose to maintain the outward facade of heterosexuality in order to gain a degree of acceptance. Modern troons are not that. They're a bunch of fetishistic males desperately trying to gain access to female spaces, often men with huge resentment towards women as gatekeepers of sex. The type of men who might take advantage of teen girls, or bear extreme anger and resentment towards their mothers. But because they can effectively craft (or steal) a narrative of suffering, everybody is too scared of being seen as cruel to call them out.
Presiona para expandir...
Why did you post a carefully written, well thought post here? Don't you realize where you are?
 
TakeSoma dijo:
And, you can't legislate acceptance. On a sane society, acceptance comes from the collective understanding that something is deemed as acceptable. You can try to force acceptance through indoctrination (which is what we see on a daily basis), but it will tend to fail on the long-run.
Presiona para expandir...
You can't legislate acceptance, nor can you legislate someone's hatred away. What most of the "we must tolerate everyone!" crowd forgets is that all your "hate speech" and #Cancel shit did was make me still hate you quietly. You didn't change my mind, you didn't challenge my beliefs, you shouted "BIGOT!" at me and told me to conform or else! And thing is, this isn't just me, this applies to everyone. People might in public talk about how "accepting" they are, but behind a closed door they still say "fuck niggers and faggots".

/siderant over
 
Look, dogfucker, one of my closest relatives is transgendered. She's only ever been known as my aunt well before she transitioned and I love her all the same. She never makes it a point to be just transgendered, because she's a lot more than that. She's a contributing member of society, is part of several communities; she's actually something your decrepit ass copes and seethes over. Considering she grew up in a third world shit hole that largely isn't accepting of LGBT people, she had to work her ass off to get the things she wanted.

I hate that pedophilic dogfucking gatekeeping deviants are put in the same boat as her. People like you are the reason normal trans people will never have acceptance. Disgusting AGPs like you only deserve the rope.
 
Tragi-Chan dijo:
Tom got a nice thing in the form of a whole lot of money. Then he wasted it all. That’s why that trans person can’t have nice things. Because he is a fool.
Presiona para expandir...
You can give a nice thing to a pedophile dog rapist, if for some reason that's what you want to do, but when that pedophile dog rapist is Tom, he will just squander it all immediately on absolutely idiotic bullshit. What a loving parent could earn in years of effort, this worthless mongoloid will blow on absolutely nothing of benefit to anyone, even himself, and lose it all.

He is the dumbest of dumbfucks according to the theory of stupidity promulgated by Cipolla:
10EKToq6gPpIvS9qRVTvlaA.png
He is in the "Stupid People" category, who cause absolutely no benefit. Their actions mostly harm both society and themselves. He has the luck of being just an iota below what society will tolerate before just necking you, while being otherwise an absolutely worthless piece of shit that contributes nothing whatsoever to the world.

If he fell into a vat of industrial waste and choked and died, the world would improve immediately by at least a scintilla.
 
Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg dijo:

thehill.com

DC restaurant apologizes after expelling transgender woman for using women’s bathroom

A Washington, D.C., restaurant issued an apology to a transgender woman who said she was kicked out for trying to use the women’s bathroom.Charlotte Clymer, a communications staffer for the Hu…
thehill.com

As I said, I've never looked into Chuckie Clymer's past at all. The above incident is what got me their attention they over reacted in a manner that I don't think is beneficial to the community as a whole at all.

I have to question how a schmuck leftist corporal who isn't all that great a writer can gain so much influence and media access in such a short time. They don't interact with the public on their home page unless you're a friend.

i do. sane ones and toxic ones. the contrast in the feedback is always amusing.
Presiona para expandir...
Shut up child fucker
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo