Why Most Transgender People Can't Have Nice Things

Destacado
If most troons were actually minding their own business and not engaging in drama, 90% of normal people wouldn't care about their existence. The reason people don't like troons is because they post their degeneracy all over the internet (like abiut how they fuck dogs and children, Thomas) or try to make themselves look so enlightened about gender and try to groom kids into it( also you, Thomas). Pretty much nobody cares what consenting adult humans do behind closed doors, Thomas. You yourself make an unnecessary spectacle of yourself every time you post here.
 
Can we remove this senile old homosexual’s ability to create threads? He just posts a lot of unreadable horseshit every few days, whenever he remembers how lonely and pointless his life is, and it always ends up off-topic after about three posts.

If he’s forgotten his Substack password, then I suggest letting him have a thread called “Not Your Blog, Fatty,” where he can post these deranged essays.
 
Most transgender people can't have nice things because, very often, they exhibit obnoxious behaviors and a huge self-entitlement that renders any sympathy for them very difficult, if not impossible. Also, many transgenders are just people experiencing acute mental illness derived from, not from rejection from others, but from their own rejection of who they are. For example, many MTF's don't seek males but females. Can you see the imbalanced loop? A man turned into a "woman" that still seeks to fuck woman, as he would as if he was still a man.

By now I'm probably already labelled a transphobe, so I might as well keep going. I don't have any issues with lesbian, gays, bisexuals, etc. But I do have tons of issues with the remaining (and increasing) LGBT alphabet soup. Woman with beards and dicks??? Who the fuck, on their right mind would deem such specimens as sane individuals? If you're really a men trapped inside a woman's body, at least try to pass and behave as one. And don't get me started on non-binaries and other made up definitions of nonsense. Their true meaning is mental illness.

And, you can't legislate acceptance. On a sane society, acceptance comes from the collective understanding that something is deemed as acceptable. You can try to force acceptance through indoctrination (which is what we see on a daily basis), but it will tend to fail on the long-run.
 
Tragi-Chan dijo:
Can we remove this senile old homosexual’s ability to create threads? He just posts a lot of unreadable horseshit every few days, whenever he remembers how lonely and pointless his life is, and it always ends up off-topic after about three posts.

If he’s forgotten his Substack password, then I suggest letting him have a thread called “Not Your Blog, Fatty,” where he can post these deranged essays.
Presiona para expandir...
Seconded. This is retarded that I have to look in his little section to see if he made a new blog post because he got kicked off facebook. His lonely ass shouldn't be allowed to keep making threadposts
 
Even if 99% of trannies just wanted to live a normal quiet life, YOU, good sir, are a disgusting, degenerated, perverse, ill-formed, ill-conceived, oxygen-wasting dogfucking pedophile who should immediately consume improperly prepared fugu.
 
"Contrary to popular belief, most transgender people are pretty conservative in their sexual practices"

Others are dog-fucking child-groomers who publicly trawl for sexual favors on their Facebook account where random people, who probably didn't want to see any of that, will in fact see exactly that.
 
Troons are deluded perverts. That's why they don't have nice things. Why are you always on about trannies, Tom?

They have nothing to do with you. You're just a garden variety pedophile psychopath with delusions of grandeur. Similar, but not the same. Share some articles about opportunistic psychopaths instead.
 
Tragi-Chan dijo:
Can we remove this senile old homosexual’s ability to create threads? He just posts a lot of unreadable horseshit every few days, whenever he remembers how lonely and pointless his life is, and it always ends up off-topic after about three posts.

If he’s forgotten his Substack password, then I suggest letting him have a thread called “Not Your Blog, Fatty,” where he can post these deranged essays.
Presiona para expandir...
I like watching Tom repeatedly make an ass of himself and get angry. It never gets old. :story:
 
As a faggot myself, a colossal one even, I am happy that I have lived to see a time where my partner could get on my health insurance when the pandemic shut down half the world. But, I have been really thinking about the way the modern gay-rights movement allowed for the current gender lunacy to form. And part of me really feels that the creation of the gay identity, as a separate state of being, was a mistake. I could go on a long complex rant about why I think that it would have been possible in modern society to acknowledge that same-sex attraction and gender-variant behaviour is normal enough across human history and across the animal kingdom that pathologizing it was wrong, without "gay" and "queer" becoming the mess of identity politics it has evolved into. That, while it was never true that homosexuality was celebrated in the premodern world the way modern queer revisionism pretends it was, the grey area it existed in varied a lot more than modern societies would admit. So my pitch is that we should have aimed for assimilationism from the get go, and pushed back hard against the queers who got all offended at that idea.

I get why the movement redefined it as a gay identity as a separate category of humanity, as a cultural category which really comes out of the gay subculture of certain cities being spread across the entire country and world. It's an effective political organizing strategy. But I feel it sent the wrong message to society, the rested acceptance on this narrative of oppressions and victimhood that was very easy for other groups to take up, instead of trying to argue from a more evidence based point of view that could have rested on limiting government interference in private lives. Everything from furries to modern troons have used the playbook to worm their way into people's good graces, to various degrees of success. Its ironic because the first trans people, who got the landmark rulings in the 70's in the US that allowed for trans people to marry as their chosen gender, were essentially the most assimilationist. They chose to maintain the outward facade of heterosexuality in order to gain a degree of acceptance. Modern troons are not that. They're a bunch of fetishistic males desperately trying to gain access to female spaces, often men with huge resentment towards women as gatekeepers of sex. The type of men who might take advantage of teen girls, or bear extreme anger and resentment towards their mothers. But because they can effectively craft (or steal) a narrative of suffering, everybody is too scared of being seen as cruel to call them out.
 
Última edición:
There's no such thing as "trans".
It's just people taking hormones and being delusional.
People are so polite that they allow those around them to live this delusion, and poison themselves.
The fact that people think its some kind of way out of being a human is a sign of how sick human beings are.
 
Malevolent Grimace dijo:
As a faggot myself, a colossal one even, I am happy that I have lived to see a time where my partner could get on my health insurance when the pandemic shut down half the world. But, I have been really thinking about the way the modern gay-rights movement allowed for the current gender lunacy to form. And part of me really feels that the creation of the gay identity, as a separate state of being, was a mistake. I could go on a long complex rant about why I think that it would have been possible in modern society to acknowledge that same-sex attraction and gender-variant behaviour is normal enough across human history and across the animal kingdom that pathologizing it was wrong, without "gay" and "queer" becoming the mess of identity politics it has evolved into. That, while it was never true that homosexuality was celebrated in the premodern world the way modern queer revisionism pretends it was, the grey area it existed in varied a lot more than modern societies would admit. So my pitch is that we should have aimed for assimilationism from the get go, and pushed back hard against the queers who got all offended at that idea.

I get why the movement redefined it as a gay identity as a separate category of humanity, as a cultural category which really comes out of the gay subculture of certain cities being spread across the entire country and world. It's an effective political organizing strategy. But I feel it sent the wrong message to society, the rested acceptance on this narrative of oppressions and victimhood that was very easy for other groups to take up, instead of trying to argue from a more evidence based point of view that could have rested on limiting government interference in private lives. Everything from furries to modern troons have used the playbook to worm their way into people's good graces, to various degrees of success. Its ironic because the first trans people, who got the landmark rulings in the 70's in the US that allowed for trans people to marry as their chosen gender, were essentially the most assimilationist. They chose to maintain the outward facade of heterosexuality in order to gain a degree of acceptance. Modern troons are not that. They're a bunch of fetishistic males desperately trying to gain access to female spaces, often men with huge resentment towards women as gatekeepers of sex. The type of men who might take advantage of teen girls, or bear extreme anger and resentment towards their mothers. But because they can effectively craft (or steal) a narrative of suffering, everybody is too scared of being seen as cruel to call them out.
Presiona para expandir...
If it makes you feel any better, garden-variety gay dudes and lesbian dudettes have de facto become the 'straights' of the LGBT community; i.e., the ones with most perceived societal privilege, with all but the most regressive elements of modern society just shrugging their shoulders at the sight of two guys holding hands. When the histrionic attention whores of the movement eventually call down the wrath of the pendulum swinging back, the people who just want to be as normal as possible while being gay are likely to still be accepted.
 
RazorBackBacon dijo:
If it makes you feel any better, garden-variety gay dudes and lesbian dudettes have de facto become the 'straights' of the LGBT community; i.e., the ones with most perceived societal privilege, with all but the most regressive elements of modern society just shrugging their shoulders at the sight of two guys holding hands. When the histrionic attention whores of the movement eventually call down the wrath of the pendulum swinging back, the people who just want to be as normal as possible while being gay are likely to still be accepted.
Presiona para expandir...
Yeah, I'm hopeful that like with other pedulum swings, it will be partial, and the well-to-do gay couple with stable employment will be viewed differently than the pervert hobo trannie or the degenerate diaperfag. I know that he was a bit of a nerd loser, but I do find it funny that people were dunking on Buttigieg for being too respectably normal a gay man. That is where we are now, where if you aren't wearing fetish gear in public, you're a traitor to the cause.

E; I'd also like people to have a sense of shame again. Like I swear, I don't understand how troons can be the way they are online. I can tell a straight person that I love my partner without mentioning my junk, but troons like Tom explicitly tie their fucking identities and origin stories to masturbation habits. Andrea Long Chu did it too, where she admitted that she consumed sissy fetish porn before transitioning.
 
Última edición:
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo