WEF Calls For End to Private Car Ownership - Cutting down on "wasteful" car ownership will help to avert a "climate apocalypse," says the WEF. Cutting down on Klaus Schwab's hypocritical bullshit will help to avert a "globohomo apocalypse" says CircuSphere.


Last Updated on July 26, 2022

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is calling for an end to private car ownership. A recently published paper calls for an end to “wasteful” private vehicle ownership in favor of public transportation and communal cars.​


“The average car or van in England is driven just 4% of the time,” the WEF paper states. It then calls on car owners to sell their vehicle because, “Car sharing platforms such as Getaround and BlueSG have already seized that opportunity to offer vehicles where you pay per hour used.”

Ending private car ownership is essential to addressing climate change, the WEF argues. The forum goes on to advocate for the same principles to be applied to city and home designs as well.

“A design process that focuses on fulfilling the underlying need instead of designing for product purchasing is fundamental to this transition,” the WEF wrote. “This is the mindset needed to redesign cities to reduce private vehicles and other usages.”

A number of European nations and U.S. states have already passed legislation that will ban the sale of non-electric cars as soon as 2030. Washington, New York and California have already passed such measures while a growing number of EU member states have done the same.

In Ireland, the government has told citizens that they will be packed into densely populated cities in order to combat climate change. Drivers will be forced off the roads as part of a plan that will “revolutionize” people’s lifestyle and behaviors.

In addition, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has directed global governments to drastically cut oil supply to domestic consumers in order to encourage compliance by “nudging” people out of their private cars.

The IEA 10-point plan to drive “changes in the behavior of consumers” and reduce gas demand at the pump includes reducing speed limits, working from home three days a week, more electric cars, car-free Sundays, more cycle lanes, cheaper public transport and greater use of long-distance trains over planes, Breitbart News reported.

In order to avert a “climate apocalypse”, the government plans to force people “out of private cars because they are the biggest offenders for emissions” with proposals that include banning fossil fuel vehicles from towns and cities nationwide to intentionally cripple ordinary motorists.
 
Someone should start an organization called something like "New World Socialist Order" or some shit, throw millions of dollars in donations from rich leftists into it, run massive membership drives to get all the leftists, troon recruiters, pedos, groomers, genderspecials, residents of portland, antifoids, and social justice idiots to join. Hold a big meeting/party like Burning Man out in the desert with everyone attending....

...then nuke the site from orbit (only way to be sure). Money well spent.
 
There are cargo ships out there that belt out more carbon than the entirety of the privately owned vehicles in the US by themselves because they burn bunker fuel. Will we be regulating those out of existence, WEF?
They've already made rules that ships can't burn bunker fuel within a country's ocean.


Cargo ships are being forced to use low sulphur diesel when close to shore. This is part of why diesel costs have risen so drastically in the last few years.
 
They have some youtube channels that I've watched off and on that talk about city design and ways to potentially incentivize less car necessity.

Here's a couple of examples: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uxykI30fS54
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tJuqe6sre2I
So my question is this: If the car situation is so terrible then why aren't we designing cities to facilitate this change? What's the point of these articles when you could achieve the same result by actually funding practical change that would help. Sure if my job was in walking or biking distance then I might just do that, but there's no reason in modern day America to not have a car when I need one to get to any appointment or any store. Getting to the local supermarket would require me to walk through about 7 lanes of traffic, fuck that.

I seen videos of this asshole, claiming public transportation is so much better than driving a car. Reasons being you don't have to pay for gas & you don't have to worry about parking.

Didn't mention you have to wait 20 minutes every time you want to ride the bus, buses only have certain routes & can never drop you off exactly where you want, If its packed, you have to be squeeze in like a sardine, oh & let's not forget the crazy & unbathed homeless that you have to sit next to.
 
I wish these sub-nigger inhuman 'people' would just stop. They won't, there's always gonna be some fucker that has the same ideas and inevitably it'll come back even when those things all die. Still, they'll might have their way in the end so I wanted to get that out in case they do- I wish every member would swing from Minecraft trees.
 
I will engage in roblox administrator banning of these people if they try this.
 
The WEF can go fuck itself.
Why should be let a bunch of out-of-touch billionaires tell us how to live? These people don't practice what they preach. Billionaires are responsible for more pollution than the common man and the beater car he could barely afford. These motherfuckers aren't going to stop using private planes and yachts. They won't even eat the fucking bugs. They want US to take responsibility for THEIR pollution by making our lives harder. Why do we have to suffer because of what a bunch of billionaires and China/India are doing to the planet?
 
I wanna rate everyone in this thread with rainbows

These plans take decades to work. These people are not stupid, they're not going to rush through some bill that takes away your car.

No they will move bit by bit. Eating away at your freedoms slowly so you don't really notice. Or anyone who does notice gets called a conspiracy nut ect ect.

You'll see things like;

Software that allows cops to disable cars fleeing from them (who could argue against that?)
Tracking software that allows your insurance company to give you "better" rates if you use it (already here btw)
Software to allow you to pay to use certain express way (also here)
Global Locked feature for your car (also here)
Pay less to drive less (taxes on miles traveled, already in progress thanks to Bootygig)

No one objected to these measure, in fact hardly anyone even noticed and if they did they weren't given any media attention so it went pretty much under the radar.

Next will be some reason to give the guberment some way to track your cars travels. For "tolls" or "taxes" of course. After that another small step like fees to travel on highways to other cities or your license will only cover one city and you'll have to pay extra to travel more. For climate awareness and to combat global warming of course!

Slowly but surely the rules will tighten, bit by bit, ever so slowly that no one notices it until one day it's just accepted that you have to put in a request to your local gubernment agent to travel outside your "allowed area".

Again, these elites are not fools, they didn't become as wealthy and powerful as they are because they were stupid or lucky. They understand history and will act accordingly. The plan will take decades to complete but that's OK. There is no rush as they have everything to gain in the longer term and nothing to win by alerting the masses.

No, my advice to you young people is to enjoy what you have now, while you still have it. The masses will never fight back like you dream. No, step by step they will give up their freedoms one by one until they're no better then the serfs of medieval times. Because that's what the elites want. To drag up back to the days of unquestioned authority. Of Lords and Kings who didn't have to bother with all this silly democracy and elections and rule and shit. They want to unfettered rule of kings back where they only have to play the game with other elites and the plebs all know their rightful place at the bottom of the pile.

Yes...enjoy it now. Because it's going away, slowly but surely. The world your children will inherit will be very different from what we know today.
 
This won't work in America. I live in the greater San Hambonio area. If you don't own a car, you're SOL. You need a car to get anywhere. Good luck walking in the muggy heat in the middle of summer. Maybe this might work in the Northeast Corridor, where everything is closer together and public transport is a thing. Hopefully Biden and Co. subsidies Uber et. al. /sneed

If you don’t already own one, you’ll discover that there are none on the market and any that come up are immediately bought by the super rich or a developer
I've been paying attention to the housing market lately. And you're just wrong. Blackrock or any other of their ilk aren't buying every home. In fact, blackrock is having issues themselves, financially. Mortgages are increasing in price which is leading to more homes not selling. Which is leading to some areas cutting their prices up to 50%. Check out the "what if I just dont buy a house" thread in the biz forum.
 
No. I'll paint my hood with your blood you Satan-licking, ancient scumfucks. I Hate The AntiChrist. Jesus Is King and God is Highest. You fuckers have already lost, Die Mad.
 
Maybe the WEF could weigh in on governments getting vagrants out of sight because there's no way public transportation is more desirable than driving when it's overrun by mentally ill drug addicts.
tolls to enter cities
Seems to me that a long-term result of tolling entry to cities is that people stop going to cities, causing even more suburban sprawl.
They have some youtube channels that I've watched off and on that talk about city design and ways to potentially incentivize less car necessity.

Here's a couple of examples: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uxykI30fS54
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tJuqe6sre2I
So my question is this: If the car situation is so terrible then why aren't we designing cities to facilitate this change? What's the point of these articles when you could achieve the same result by actually funding practical change that would help. Sure if my job was in walking or biking distance then I might just do that, but there's no reason in modern day America to not have a car when I need one to get to any appointment or any store. Getting to the local supermarket would require me to walk through about 7 lanes of traffic, fuck that.
Wrath of Gnon on Twitter has a lot of interesting info about how to create walkable cities. A lot of what he talks about is the opposite of the WEF bugman shit. You can actually have a lot of urban density with merely 2-6 story buildings. Much of Japan (where WoG lives) is constructed that way.
 
If we transported these anti-car autists to 1887 they would probably find a way to complain about personal horses and how wasteful keeping one is. "Just move from the frontier and live in a city bro".
 
You will eat nothing and you will be happy. Die you fithly no good normals. *Spits*
81b.jpg
 
I'll never give up my wheels. My state already has the least amount of paved roads in the US, our public transit infrastructure is even more of a joke. Taking away cars would return my state to the 18th century but with consoomerism and faggotry.

I hope those WEF faggots all die in a plane crash.
 
Once again, the powers that be openly display their wild contempt for individual experience and humanity in favor of bolstering their statistics and finances. You're just a number, because that's the only way they can make sense of or justify any of these thought processes.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo