WEF Calls For End to Private Car Ownership - Cutting down on "wasteful" car ownership will help to avert a "climate apocalypse," says the WEF. Cutting down on Klaus Schwab's hypocritical bullshit will help to avert a "globohomo apocalypse" says CircuSphere.


Last Updated on July 26, 2022

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is calling for an end to private car ownership. A recently published paper calls for an end to “wasteful” private vehicle ownership in favor of public transportation and communal cars.​


“The average car or van in England is driven just 4% of the time,” the WEF paper states. It then calls on car owners to sell their vehicle because, “Car sharing platforms such as Getaround and BlueSG have already seized that opportunity to offer vehicles where you pay per hour used.”

Ending private car ownership is essential to addressing climate change, the WEF argues. The forum goes on to advocate for the same principles to be applied to city and home designs as well.

“A design process that focuses on fulfilling the underlying need instead of designing for product purchasing is fundamental to this transition,” the WEF wrote. “This is the mindset needed to redesign cities to reduce private vehicles and other usages.”

A number of European nations and U.S. states have already passed legislation that will ban the sale of non-electric cars as soon as 2030. Washington, New York and California have already passed such measures while a growing number of EU member states have done the same.

In Ireland, the government has told citizens that they will be packed into densely populated cities in order to combat climate change. Drivers will be forced off the roads as part of a plan that will “revolutionize” people’s lifestyle and behaviors.

In addition, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has directed global governments to drastically cut oil supply to domestic consumers in order to encourage compliance by “nudging” people out of their private cars.

The IEA 10-point plan to drive “changes in the behavior of consumers” and reduce gas demand at the pump includes reducing speed limits, working from home three days a week, more electric cars, car-free Sundays, more cycle lanes, cheaper public transport and greater use of long-distance trains over planes, Breitbart News reported.

In order to avert a “climate apocalypse”, the government plans to force people “out of private cars because they are the biggest offenders for emissions” with proposals that include banning fossil fuel vehicles from towns and cities nationwide to intentionally cripple ordinary motorists.
 
In Ireland, the government has told citizens that they will be packed into densely populated cities in order to combat climate change. Drivers will be forced off the roads as part of a plan that will “revolutionize” people’s lifestyle and behaviors.
The conspicuous refusal to acknowledge urban heat islands is proof that this is not about the environment.
 
The IEA 10-point plan to drive “changes in the behavior of consumers” and reduce gas demand at the pump includes reducing speed limits, working from home three days a week, more electric cars, car-free Sundays, more cycle lanes, cheaper public transport and greater use of long-distance trains over planes, Breitbart News reported.

We're not personally going to invest in or put in any effort to make any of this remotely feasible, but we'll still tell you how you have to live your life.

By the way, have you tried these bugs yet?
 
Come and get it. Over my cold dead fucking body.

I will not give up my car
I will not live a pod
I will not eat the bugs
I will not suck tranny dick
I hate the Antichrist.
I will not let you win Klaus.
6715_2021_10_17_1_.jpg
 
The flying to 'climate summits' in private jets didn't give it away?
That, too, but the fact that they want people stuffed into bughives, which wreak havoc on the environment, flatly contradicts the supposed goals of their social engineering schemes. It's more than mere hypocrisy; it's like saying eating old paint chips will cure lead poisoning.
 
Many cities have already been carrying out this agenda for years by removing roads, banning parking for new buildings, and limiting the size of cities through urban growth boundaries.

They won’t take your car away. They’ll just tax ownership and make it so you can’t drive anywhere unless you’re rich enough to be chauffeured or pay $100s per day in parking fees and tolls/congestion charges.

Similarly, they won’t force you to leave your house. You’ll just have to pay the property taxes of a skyscraper if you already live in one because if your house was torn down and a skyscraper built in its place, they’d get more tax money so by not tearing down your house you need to pay for not using the land “productively” (this is a real academic concept called the Land Value Tax that I’ve seen pushed recently). If you don’t already own one, you’ll discover that there are none on the market and any that come up are immediately bought by the super rich or a developer.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo