- Registrado
- 3 de Mayo, 2019
NgmiPretending it's not clownworld:
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
NgmiPretending it's not clownworld:
It was still blown up out of proportion though.By that time, I understood that the "red scare" was not as unreasonable as libtards make it out to be, and in fact, was mostly validated by declassified documents that came out of the Soviet Union.
The Jungle was actually something I read when I was 20 or so on my own. It is actually something I don't particularly object to because...yeah, the working conditions in those plants were horrific for everyone - employee to consumer. I think it is an example of the excesses of unbridled capitalism. I am aware of the heavy socialist element of the book, but that doesn't take away from the capitalistic horrors presented. I can understand why the USDA was created based on the book, though the food standards weren't exactly the point.There was always some element of indoctrination involved.
I grew up in a purple-red area politically, and remember in elementary school learning all about the O-Zone layer, saving the whales, stopping deforestation, Earth Day, and all that sort of stuff, from a strong pro-environmentalism perspective, bordering on hippie-ism. They unironically showed us the "Rainforest Rap" that says "by the year 2000 [the rainforest] will all disappear...", in the year 2000.
Later on, in high school, I recall reading "The Invisible Knapsack" (about white privilege) at some point. In AP Literature, we were made to read Upton Sinclair's socialist work "The Jungle" and the feminist classic "A Handmaid's Tale". I took a sociology elective, since it was one of the only options I had in that time-slot, and that class was nothing but indoctrination. However, it was taught in such a simplistic way (the textbook was at a 7th-grade level, and the class was mostly vocabulary word searches) that the indoctrination was near-worthless. Still got to learn about how all the Social Justice stuff ties into critical theory and Marxism, though, since this was years before discussion of that topic was highly politicized and verboten.
Regardless, I'm not sure we were ever really asked to engage seriously with anything right-of-center. Except by my economics teacher, who liked to show us John Stossel videos in class sometimes. Also, in the 8th grade, state standards required that they teach us about Islam, its tenets, and how it is a "religion of peace". My highly conservative social studies teacher did so reluctantly, and as a counter-point, would read Bill O'Reilly For Kids to us at the end of each class period.
Overall, things weren't as overtly political in class back in the day, but teachers were still more progressive than the average, and that did work its way into their lessons sometimes. As a side note, I recall several classes (typically social studies, or oddly enough, health class) actually having political discussions that were civil on both sides, something that I don't think would be likely in today's environment. It was just a different time.
Yeah, I don't necessarily object to it, either, and our teacher made it clear The Jungle was basically written as socialist propaganda, particularly in the last few chapters, where the characters go and devote their lives to Socialism. Still, my point was that they generally weren't having us read Ayn Rand (probably for the best), Robert Heinlein, CS Lewis, or much classical literature, instead focusing primarily on works by progressive and socialist authors. I can't really blame them for this, considering the relative dearth of good "conservative literature", but the book choices in the curriculum are something to take note of. I imagine that some districts nowadays don't even consider Sinclair or Orwell woke enough (or "too white") for their reading lists.The Jungle was actually something I read when I was 20 or so on my own. It is actually something I don't particularly object to because...yeah, the working conditions in those plants were horrific for everyone - employee to consumer. I think it is an example of the excesses of unbridled capitalism. I am aware of the heavy socialist element of the book, but that doesn't take away from the capitalistic horrors presented. I can understand why the USDA was created based on the book, though the food standards weren't exactly the point.
Now that you mention it, I remember similar degeneracy from my middle school days: Our school choir (of which I was a part) watched the musical RENT in class, the one about gay people with AIDS. Then had to memorize and perform songs from it for the rest of the year. Alongside songs about saving the kids in Africa and music from Wicked. It's probably just the selection effect, but nearly everyone I know who stuck around with that stuff (theatre/choir kids) well into high school are hyper-woke progressives now, several having moved to the Left Coast to be with their kind, despite this area being relatively accepting and middle-of-the-road politically. Although maybe by Portland standards, we're a hateful hellhole that hates anybody who is different. In hindsight, that stuff was uncomfortably close to indoctrination, especially considering the repetitive nature of learning/practicing/performing songs. I still hear them pop into my head sometimes.As far as things going too far into degeneracy, when I was a junior in high school and in US history (as is required of most 11 graders in the US), our teacher was too lazy to teach us about the 60s, so instead had us all watch Hair, though with the caveat that we probably should not tell our parents that he showed us this. It became clear at fellatio and pededastry why he told us not to say anything. Big oof looking back on that as middle aged adult.
You have it upside downthe "red scare" was not as unreasonable as libtards make it out to be
You have it upside down
Bernie-style Leftists - anti-woke Leftists, anti-globalisation Leftists, anti-Israel Leftists, economic Leftists - are the actual political underdogs of the Western world
Not the religious Right
see: torture and massacre of labour organisers by the Italian Blackshirts and German Freikorps, the long list of killings of labour organisers in the US, the assassination of MLK Jr., Operation Mockingbird, Le Cercle/Pinay Group, Operation Gladio, Operation Condor, the CIA's role in Pinochet's coup in Chile, COINTELPRO, etc.
Usually those kids have jobs and are actively contributing towards their communities in some way shape or form. It's not perfect or even ideal really, but in some sense, they have a more stable educational channel in the form of learning a trade rather than being propagandized. And I say this as someone who is educated: education really should be for those who value it. Everyone else should just have an oppurtunity to work and contribute to their communities. We shouldn't force people to learn if they don't want to since it wastes our tax payer money and their time. They should just get basic education in the mathematical, linguistic/writing and social skills they need to do business and then be on their way to earn a paycheck. That's how society operated for thousands of years and really there is nothing fundamentally wrong with that model of education. If you want to become a scholar, then you should be encouraged to. If you don't, get enough of an education to do your job and start working.Yes, but
Pretending it's not clownworld:
Signal to noise. If everyone gets fed the same bullshit at least there's a way to filter it out and compare what is state propaganda. Shared experiences and narratives are necessary for society. State controlled bullshit 8 hours a day is probably better than what most kids with uninterested parents would learn otherwise. Look at all the countries without a public school system. They're all shitty back waters.
So what do I do then? How can I earn validation in your eyes and not be bullshit?"woke" leftism isn't the problem, leftism is bullshit, full stop. And the immoral actions of your opposition doesn't make it any less harmful or retarded. That's whataboutism.
When I was in middle school, part of my reading material included a book about a homosexual grade schooler navigating his way through life.
Grooming students is not a recent development. Political agendas have been ingrained in our curriculums for decades now.
our teacher was too lazy to teach us about the 60s, so instead had us all watch Hair, though with the caveat that we probably should not tell our parents that he showed us this. It became clear at fellatio and pededastry why he told us not to say anything
Leftism is my ethnic tradition I'm retvrning to. My ancestors were poor miners who organised and striked at risk to themselves to win you the 8 hour workday, the weekend, and protections against you getting killed at work. Your ancestors were poor scabs and goons and toadies who sold my ancestors out for a few extra shekels. I don't really care what their great-great-grandchildren have to say.leftism is bullshit, full stop
>going to a school with more than five or six monkeys in it>paying attention in school and not ditching class to watch black kids worldstar on the school lawn
I've never had gay gym teachers, they were always just fat soon-to-be-retired farts. If the gym teacher was female she'd usually look like dykish soccer mom tho, and we'd take shots at her sexuality. Never met a single music teacher who wasn't a shrill bansheei always remember the gym teacher being stereotypical gay/groomer if it was a male and the music teacher being a THOT if it was a female.
So what do I do then? How can I earn validation in your eyes and not be bullshit?
Neither do I, and I never did...Like I said earlier, I don't want to live in a society where I'm punished merely for owning property or for being better off than those around me.