Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Was funi's the one with biggest errors?
What about the others?
It was missing two important parts. See below.

Also, more importantly, the document styled VICTOR MIGNOGNA’S SUR-REPLY TO APPELLEE FUNIMATIONS, LLC’S RESPONSE BRIEF is missing two required sections, the Certificate of Compliance with Tex. R. App. 9.4, which is supposed to include a word count, and a Certificate of Service.
 
Ty was yucking it up with Nick an hour before the deadline. He shouldn't be invited back after turning in what he did. He got a 2-month extension and waited until the last minute again.

1592772882964.png


Since the defendants filed their briefs on March 31st, Ty has been on Nick's show 9 times, for a total of almost 33 hours.

April 2nd - 3 hours, 48 minutes
April 3rd - 1 hour, 10 minutes
April 10th - 4 hours, 52 minutes
April 17th - 5 hours, 9 minutes
May 15th - 4 hours, 54 minutes
May 23rd - 3 hours, 57 minutes
May 29th - 2 hours, 30 minutes
June 5th - 1 hour, 54 minutes
June 19th - 4 hours, 40 minutes
 
Última edición:
Ty was yucking it up with Nick an hour before the deadline. He shouldn't be invited back after turning in what he did. He got a 2-month extension and waited until the last minute again.

Ver archivo adjunto 1395637

Since the defendants filed their briefs on March 31st, Ty has been on Nick's show 8 times, for a total of almost 28 hours.

April 2nd - 3 hours, 48 minutes
April 3rd - 1 hour, 10 minutes
April 10th - 4 hours, 52 minutes
April 17th - 5 hours, 9 minutes
May 23rd - 3 hours, 57 minutes
May 29th - 2 hours, 30 minutes
June 5th - 1 hour, 54 minutes
June 19th - 4 hours, 40 minutes
Irrelevant. As long as it's timely, nobody cares what he does in his spare time.

His filing isn't absolutely horrendous. It's serviceable. Or should anyone with obligations stop interacting with anyone else to give you satisfaction?

His docs are filled. @AnOminous can chime in if filing corrections for errors like missing chapters or fixing typos is permitted as long as the core of the document isn't modified. IANAL and not in the US so I'll let people who actually know that shit answer.
 
Ty doesn't even need to make complicated paragraphs or novel arguments or convoluted references. He just needs to hammer on the facts, point out the law, and just have impeccable formatting. That's all that Vic needs. The defendants hung themselves with their own fuckery, so all the lawyers have to do is hand them a rope.

This is hardly case losing, or even case damaging, but come on.
 
Pessimism about the the riots, CHAZ and the Last of Us 2 tranny sex scene has me feeling we're balls deep into clown world and three appeals court judges will just "honk, honk" and affirm Chupps ruling.

Yeah, sounds like the documents are disappointing. Not really a reason for it. Even if they were perfect it would be a tall mountain to climb.
 
Isn't the outside lawyer doing the appeal?

Ty said that he and Mike did the drafting on Friday's stream, though credited his team if they were successful. He said they were perfectionists who wanted to keep polishing until the last minute. We heard that before and Ty notarized three affidavits by phone on the same day and then turned in a response to the TCPA late with blank citations that were blamed on compression.

I thought he would've done better the next time. It's only Vic's career and reputation. Dude got so smashed, he tried to open an open bottle.

 
Some of you are so good at picking nits that you should consider becoming chimpanzees. How many times has Nick stated on his show that imperfect paperwork rarely sinks cases? Look at the forest and not the trees. The goal here is to convince the judges (who, I have reason to believe, are also human) to let this case have its day in court, not to show off a technical proficiency at English grammar and obtuse paperwork rule-following.
 
Some of you are so good at picking nits that you should consider becoming chimpanzees. How many times has Nick stated on his show that imperfect paperwork rarely sinks cases?
the problem is that the Lazy drunkass got 250k for all of this and couldnt produce one professional document.
Nick got people to give their hard earned money to some loser he met at a AA meeting....
 
Some of you are so good at picking nits that you should consider becoming chimpanzees. How many times has Nick stated on his show that imperfect paperwork rarely sinks cases? Look at the forest and not the trees. The goal here is to convince the judges (who, I have reason to believe, are also human) to let this case have its day in court, not to show off a technical proficiency at English grammar and obtuse paperwork rule-following.
Pretty much rule #1 in any type of professional persuasive writing or speech is to try not to distract your audience from the point. Technical and grammar issues do just that.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo