Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

So here's my store brand bootleg body language on Ronald McSoye III:

He holds himself very meekly, there's no confidence in him at all, when it starts out he has his hands on his thighs or just generally out of sight, likely to absorb the sweat from his palms due to the nerves. (So much for being a sheepdog).

He tries his best at looking calm and collected but....

Rapid, continuous blinking, this continues throughout his entire deposition.

During the opening statements of who is present and what is being done his eyes cannot rest on one person, or one spot to indicate calm, his eyes dart constantly.

Before he's even sworn in, he's gulping and licking his lips due to how dry and nervous he clearly is.

Later into the deposition, he desperately tries to hold his gaze on Ty when answering questions but blinks a bare fucking minimum of five times per sentence.

Meaning he's lying and lying continuously. Plain and simple.

Here's my off-brand bootleg bootleg body language on Ms. Ronald BoyToye the Third:

His palms are sweaty,
Knees weak, arms are heavy,
There's vomit on his jacket already: Mon's spaghetti
He's nervous, but on the surface he looks calm and ready
To drop truth, but he keeps on forgetting
 
Here's my off-brand bootleg bootleg body language on Ms. Ronald BoyToye the Third:

His palms are sweaty,
Knees weak, arms are heavy,
There's vomit on his jacket already: Mon's spaghetti
He's nervous, but on the surface he looks calm and ready
To drop truth, but he keeps on forgetting

What he tweeted out, Ty Beard goes so loud
He opens his mouth, but few words come out
He's chokin', how, everybody's jokin' now
The clocks won't run out, times never up, over, blaow!
Snap back to reality, oh there goes gravity
Oh, there goes Soye, he choked
He's so cucked, but he won't give up that easy? No
He won't have it, he knows his whole back city's ropes
It don't matter, he's dope, he knows that, but he'll soon be broke
 
In general, though, he can't admit that he'd do what anyone else would do if accused of such a thing, and react angrily and if it actually harmed him, sue over it, exactly as Vic Mignogna did.
I mean... he would ignore it, supposedly, if someone falsely accused him of being a pedophile. But he apparently thinks that there are situations where a false accusation shouldn't be ignored...

by Vic's employer...
1562873169029.png

by Vic...
1562873184501.png

in fact, he thought Vic should sue...
1562873210880.png

:thinking:
 
I mean... he would ignore it, supposedly, if someone falsely accused him of being a pedophile. But he apparently thinks that there are situations where a false accusation shouldn't be ignored...

So if not suing him proves what he said was true, what does suing him prove? Hmmm.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 836682
Ver archivo adjunto 836683

Crossposting

NikRikRakets is gonna have this easy:

1. I'm not Vic's lawyer, ask him
2. I'm not Vic's lawyer, ask him
3. Read the deposition. Draw your own conclusion.
4. None of your Goddamn Business


Any other answer beyond those and Nick's going to get caught up in all sorts of legal shitflinging that the spergs will like.

Of course he could just post a picture of Charlie Sheen with the #WINNING sign. That would work to drive the chilreeeeeeeeen nuts too.
 
There's always so many disingenuous fucks about the GFM. They really hate that thing. It seems they always manage to find a new dumbass to ask the same questions despite how many times it has been repeated. Nick is obviously tired about answering it at this point and all the new morons are there just to clog up his mentions.
Nick really is taking it well considering he's basically being a decoy for all the bullshit.
 
NikRikRakets is gonna have this easy:

1. I'm not Vic's lawyer, ask him
2. I'm not Vic's lawyer, ask him
3. Read the deposition. Draw your own conclusion.
4. None of your Goddamn Business


Any other answer beyond those and Nick's going to get caught up in all sorts of legal shitflinging that the spergs will like.

Of course he could just post a picture of Charlie Sheen with the #WINNING sign. That would work to drive the chilreeeeeeeeen nuts too.
Alternatively, he could just tell the dude to suck it. Every one of those has been answered in some way a half dozen times on stream. He's clearly not interested in listening to Nick and so Nick doesn't owe him anything.
 
Alternatively, he could just tell the dude to suck it. Every one of those has been answered in some way a half dozen times on stream. He's clearly not interested in listening to Nick and so Nick doesn't owe him anything.

Why would he answer this guy for free when he can make Ron and Monica pay tens of thousands of dollars to fail to get the very same answers (that have been answered publicly and repeatedly anyway)?
 
So how bad is it that Ron admitted to having more social media accounts than what has been provided to BHBH? I'd guess BHBH just won their motion to compel.
INTERROGATORY NO. 14. Identify all social media handles and user names, and the associated social media platforms or sites, you have used between (a) the more recent of (i) the date you first met Plaintiff or (ii) January 1, 2014 and (b) the present.

ANSWER: Defendant objects as this Interrogatory is overly broad and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, as the Interrogatory seeks information that is unrelated to the claims in this lawsuit in both scope and time. Moreover,Defendant objects to the relevance of Defendant’s social media handles and user names, and the safety of disclosing any additional addresses absent the Rule 11 Agreement described in response to Interrogatory No. 3. Subject to, and without waiving, the aforementioned objections,Defendant answers as follows:

Facebook: /ronnie.toye
Twitter: @rontoye
Also did Monica do a big oopsie? https://twitter.com/rialisms/status/1079107908133101569 http://archive.li/I5GnI
https://twitter.com/Rialisms/status/1047947465306066945 http://archive.li/XwHgH
She's tagging Ron at his handle rontoye3 and not rontoye. Sure as shit looks like he's been using that to keep his work/private life separate and sending personal DM's
 
I have been assaulted by Ron Toye who may be a pedophile.

According to Ron Toye, who may be a pedophile from what I have been told, in his deposition at 2:17:48 of this video his definition of assault is: "any action verbally, physically, emotionally that asserts themselves and hurts or offends another person."

I call it out now, Ron Toye, a pedophile, has assaulted me by his sheer presence which offends me deeply, and I demand recompense and satisfaction.

I shall setup a gofundme for my defense from this pedophile.
 
I thought they were being paid on contingency.
That's just a punctuation error.
lionel-hutz-wo-esq-contingency-no-money-down-phone-555-784266.png

This sounds completely delusional.

Out of nearly 400 tweets on a very specific topic, sent in about a 2 month period roughly half a year ago, he claims to not be able to remember a single one. No reasonable person (read member of prospective jury pool) is going to believe that.

How can he speak to his state of mind when he sent them when he is on record saying that he doesn't remember sending a single one of them?



He did write them and his super-duper lolyer authenticated them to the court.



Except, it is. How is a jury going to take him seriously as a credible witness? He is either a moron with severe memory issues, a bald face liar, or both.
The real ball-buster here (aside from Monica and Monica's bull) is: they were noticed all these tweets months ago, and then asked to provide them. So, in all that time, he's never gone to look and see if any one of them were actually him?
He wouldn't and couldn't. He was blatantly lying to KC with no intent of ever giving them anything for the Quid Pro Quo blacklisting of Vic for him and his not-wife. Once they had screwed over Vic it would have been too late for them to undo it after his sponsorship suddenly vanished, and besides, they were breaking the law so they couldn't exactly complain about him fucking them over. Insert your favorite smug Ron "I got one over on everyone cause I'm so much better than you" Toye screencap here.
Ty might do real well to have a little chat with the Tuttle group. If he hasn't already.
"Just Christian" aka "I have contempt for all of you and would likely be smited by Christ were I to get within 100 yards of a church, but I know saying I'm an atheist isn't popular enough yet"
Not in Texas, anyways. Certainly not in Tarrant County. And it'd be real interesting if he'd said anything anti-christian or pro-athiest this whole time. I wonder...
Right now, after reading all the stuff about Soye, I would assume he is stupid enough to say: Matthew 7 Verse 1-2
He'd say it in front of a Judge, too.
Here's my off-brand bootleg bootleg body language on Ms. Ronald BoyToye the Third:

His palms are sweaty,
Knees weak, arms are heavy,
There's vomit on his jacket already: Mon's spaghetti
He's nervous, but on the surface he looks calm and ready
To drop truth, but he keeps on forgetting
But we're not even sure if he's Ron Toye (yes, the real Ron Toye)
Won't the real @RonToye please stand up?
 
That's just a punctuation error.
lionel-hutz-wo-esq-contingency-no-money-down-phone-555-784266.png


The real ball-buster here (aside from Monica and Monica's bull) is: they were noticed all these tweets months ago, and then asked to provide them. So, in all that time, he's never gone to look and see if any one of them were actually him?

Ty might do real well to have a little chat with the Tuttle group. If he hasn't already.

Not in Texas, anyways. Certainly not in Tarrant County. And it'd be real interesting if he'd said anything anti-christian or pro-athiest this whole time. I wonder...

He'd say it in front of a Judge, too.

But we're not even sure if he's Ron Toye (yes, the real Ron Toye)
Won't the real @RonToye please stand up?
Well it looks like tuttle group may be pulling a 'switch corp names' or something, IIRC mortgage companies are somewhat fluid and shift around alot.

Currently Toye and his 'friend' are at MAM forget what it stands for, but it came out in depo.
 
Hmmmm yes Shane, who would have thought that releasing a heavily one sided redacted deposition would get your filthy KV side to continue to hate an innocent man? 🤔

No one said for MONTHS that it’s exactly what would happen... nobody at all said that even remotely once

What happened to redacting names btw?
Yet again it’s your filthy side who keeps fighting to redact names and information but somehow manages to keep it all unredacted on the record every time... hmmmm I wonder why?

Ver archivo adjunto 836521





Ver archivo adjunto 836519
Ver archivo adjunto 836935

Ahhh yes Shane, there are definitely more surprise witnesses that will definitely be able to be admitted as evidence into an ongoing case that has had it’s interrogatory discovery due for over 70 days now... that’s definitely going to happen.

Are you saying they’re going to shoot for an appeal with the magical hundreds of witnesses after they lose or are you saying these surprise witnesses are literally waiting for the judge to not know what hit him?


These are relevant towards the discovery games, even though Shane is irrelevant himself, so I’m gonna crosspost them here as quotes

That's just a punctuation error.
lionel-hutz-wo-esq-contingency-no-money-down-phone-555-784266.png
Hey! That’s privileged information! Get out of my office!
 
Última edición:
Well it looks like tuttle group may be pulling a 'switch corp names' or something, IIRC mortgage companies are somewhat fluid and shift around alot.

Currently Toye and his 'friend' are at MAM forget what it stands for, but it came out in depo.
That stands to reason. Imagine googling your own company name, and finding out you're famous for blackmailing/extorting a convention into blacklisting a slightly effeminate pussy-slaying voice actor?

(psst. how embarrassing.)
 
It would be easier to avoid litigation though wouldn't it? If it was only due to being drunk I assume you could immediately reteact the statement, apologize, ect. So unless it was some serious damage I wouldn't think it would often end up in court.

Generally a public retraction and sincere apology is sufficient so long as you didn’t remain an asshole once sober.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo