- Registrado
- 28 de Feb, 2019
The only thing I can see being an issue is that Slatosch said a conclusionary statement that the contract was breached, which isn't kosher as far as I know of.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Even removing that section, the entire rest of it provides more than enough evidence for a trier of fact to come to that conclusion. So not an issue at all.The only thing I can see being an issue is that Slatosch said a conclusionary statement that the contract was breached, which isn't kosher as far as I know of.
I will admit, the retweet = conspiracy angle Ty went for on page 54 and 55 seemed kind of... limp.
I really need to read this whole thing, though.
I'm just starting to look at the transcripts, skiming through. Wow! That's just horrifying.
Tbh both.The proceedings or the fact that The Douche uploaded them?
"I know I stabbed you multiple times, but you went to the hospital and you recovered just fine so it's like my stabbings never happened"Yeah this logic seems like "oh sure they committed a criminal act against you but you were able to bounce back from it so we won't punish the person who committed the criminal act against you".
I doubt this kind of logic would fly if applied to any other situation.
Spednought watermark removed.
Kept the hashtags.
Can any of the law kiwis pull up Chupps judicial history? Could this be a case of this being outside what he normally does? If he is not used to this section of civil law, that would explain a fair bit, especially because the sheer size of the filings could have prevented him from being able to bone up on the relevent law. Would explain an awful fucking lot from the bench, alongside what we can also deduce. .Chupp seemed... Confused most of the hearing.
Can any of the law kiwis pull up Chupps judicial history?
He might just be a lazy fuck that doesn't want complex cases. Look at his docket: 85% is personal injury (he's a former personal injury lawyer before becoming judge), 10% contract/debt, and 4.8% civil, and 0.02% other.
Nah, not only does that help a little, that outright answers it. Between the sloppy filing from Beard, the mountain of bullshit from the defendants, and the fact that barely even 15% of his cases as a JUDGE cover the topic (And his lawyer experience is well outside of it). The Honorable Chupp is probably well and truly out of his depth, he and his clerks were robbed of the time needed to bone up on it, Beard failed to make a clear case that would help him grasp it intuitively, and he probably also just wants the bullshit to end.From back in the thread, a comment which I HAVE NOT verified:
Honorable John Chupp's docket can be found easily from here:
141st District Court of Texas
I hope this helps a little while you wait for a proper answer, @Gehenna.
Embrace it. Turn it into a business. Become a lawyer.I can FEEL the autism growing inside, it must be purged with fire.
The worst part about what you just said... I am seriously considering it, have been for a while now.Embrace it. Turn it into a business. Become a lawyer.
step 1: take lsatThe worst part about what you just said... I am seriously considering it, have been for a while now.
Lawtwitter Part 6 when?step 1: take lsat
step 2: get into law school
step 3: graduate
step 4: pass the bar
step 5: sit on twitter all day making bad memes and crowd-fund for asspats while begging popehat to touch your peepee
step 6: kill yourself