- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2018
That was literally just yesterday. It's called reading and catching up.Then why even come in here to chuckle and smugly post about old shit? Absolute sped.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
That was literally just yesterday. It's called reading and catching up.Then why even come in here to chuckle and smugly post about old shit? Absolute sped.
Appeals courts tend to be somewhat sane (bar a few exceptions) so if the case gets tossed there we'll hear legitimate reasons rather than "I'm too fucking lazy to do my job, fuck you for taking me from the country club, now either smell my farts and say they smell nice or get the fuck out".
That said, I admit its optimistic they'll come down hard at all. It's more likely they'll tell him to hear it neutrally and fairly and that's it.... at which point Chupp will do just that and anything he can weasel out of the case he will.
So yeah... likely another ten years. Granted this is if Chupp is the lolcow I think he is, which I could be wrong on. He could just be an idiot (God knows plenty of those exist) in which case he'll just hear the case.... which means god knows how long it'll take.
Late and gayer than Elton John, @AnOminous found stuff a bit more credible than that.
I get that some of you are dying to turn the whole weeb wars section into some homegrown lolcow community to laugh at, but at least try to keep up.
Then catch up and then open your cockwarmer, less chance of looking like a brainlet that way.That was literally just yesterday. It's called reading and catching up.
Yeah, I'm the brainlet for laughing at re-tards who attempted to question the legal ruling of an actual judge based on anonymous online reviews. Yeah, fuck offThen catch up and then open your cockwarmer, less chance of looking like a brainlet that way.
We just need to get Trump to tweet #Istandwithvic, obviously
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the only truly ironclad rule in our justice system is "Get these lolcows out of my court".
If Ty manages to get even one charge past the Great Wall Of Autism, he's a success in my book.
Late, gay and mad? If you're looking for a retard to laugh at try the mirror.Yeah, I'm the brainlet for laughing at re-tards who attempted to question the legal ruling of an actual judge based on anonymous online reviews. Yeah, fuck off
You mean beyond the fact that irrefutable evidence that ron did commit TI that isn't protected by free speech somehow has no merit in the judge's eye? The fact that the hearing was for TCPA and not an evidence hearing? do I need to go on?10 years?
Chupp is a Lolcow?
What is any of this based on?
I would too. Though thats it... like they say, no gay ops and no interacting with cows.In some summary article from google, I read that judges in the course of an election campaign can accept a donation even from the parties in a case that they are currently considering. And they should not even withdraw. I do not know whether it is true or not. But if there are very flexible rules, I wonder if it is possible to organize a GFM campaign in support of Judge Chupp's opponent in the next election.
Because if so, and if someone does, I will definitely throw in a few dollars. To properly troll him.
so here is a hot take, Judge Chupp has made some stupid decisions in the past that led to him having those decisions reversed in appeals, this may be a reoccuring theme with this judge
I mean, I was in the room with him, and you haven’t actually listed anything he’s done consistent with being a lolcow.You mean beyond the fact that irrefutable evidence that ron did commit TI that isn't protected by free speech somehow has no merit in the judge's eye? The fact that the hearing was for TCPA and not an evidence hearing? do I need to go on?
Like I said though, I could be wrong. He could take whatever appeals gives him and roll with it, and not chimp out.
Though I do find it curious some elements of weeb wars seem zealously, almost religiously against the notion of Chupp being wrong, dumb, a lolcow, or any combination therein. Aren't we just supposed to laugh at cows?
"Anyone who does something I don't like is a lolcow"You mean beyond the fact that irrefutable evidence that ron did commit TI that isn't protected by free speech somehow has no merit in the judge's eye? The fact that the hearing was for TCPA and not an evidence hearing? do I need to go on?
Like I said though, I could be wrong. He could take whatever appeals gives him and roll with it, and not chimp out.
Though I do find it curious some elements of weeb wars seem zealously, almost religiously against the notion of Chupp being wrong, dumb, a lolcow, or any combination therein. Aren't we just supposed to laugh at cows?
There's a lot of competition around..."Anyone who does something I don't like is a lolcow"
I think you're the stupidest person thats posted so far.
Dumber than shane? because I think Chupp is a lolcow?"Anyone who does something I don't like is a lolcow"
I think you're the stupidest person thats posted so far.
You mean beyond the fact that irrefutable evidence that ron did commit TI that isn't protected by free speech somehow has no merit in the judge's eye? The fact that the hearing was for TCPA and not an evidence hearing? do I need to go on?
Like I said though, I could be wrong. He could take whatever appeals gives him and roll with it, and not chimp out.
Though I do find it curious some elements of weeb wars seem zealously, almost religiously against the notion of Chupp being wrong, dumb, a lolcow, or any combination therein. Aren't we just supposed to laugh at cows?
My point exactly.Some guys misunderstand the logic behind all this.
Previously, someone wrote that if defendants denied certain judge's decisions, claiming the judge was biased, they would look ridiculous. Now many people think that in this particular case it is ridiculous for the plaintiff and ISWV to disagree with the judge's decisions.
But that's not how it works. If the judge said 2*2=4 and the defendants say he is biased, they are lolcow.
If the judge said that 2*2=5 he is lolcow himself.
What Ron wrote to Slatosh is not university algebra or quantum physics.
looking at some of his court precedings in the past he been appealed several times, im not saying he is an idiot, i am saying he may need to learn more about properly putting the law into practicethis thread is for discussions of the legal issues at hand, if you're going to argue that chupp is unfit put some fucking evidence in your post. as has been stated multiple times, anonymous reviews from people on the losing side of a judge's decision are as reliable as shane's twitter account. don't speculate with bullshit just because you don't like what chupp ruled. transcripts from the hearing will be out after a brief wait and then we will have some verifiable shit to review.