Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

[Dopey Cunt]

It went a little differently:

J: What contracts did they interfere with?
T: We have proof they interfered with Kamehacon
J: you were invited back though right? So what damages were there?
T: We were invited back, but that was with new requirements and legal expenses. We had to pay for security and got a worse location.
J: How much did that cost you?
T: I don’t know the exact amount right now
J: ok then, it’s dismissed.
( For TI with contract)

TI with prospective business was dismissed because Ty couldn’t prove Ron/Monica had anything to do with the other cancellations.

My problem with Chupp's flawed logic is that Ty didn't need to prove any of that during this time because this was supposed to be a TCPA hearing. Ty just needed to show that there was reason enough to suspect that something was going on in order to move forward and get the rest of the evidence he needed. But Chupp was asking for evidence and specific things that's above what you'd need for a simple TCPA hearing which Ty came prepared for that. A TCPA hearing.
A normal judge would've looked at what Ty provided and considered the possibility that there were more contracts that were breached and that there was possible conspiracy. If the judge gave a favorable ruling, that would give Ty the green light that he can proceed to find the rest of the evidence he needed to make a stronger case and prove all the claims on the defendants. But he didn't bother. He wanted everything up front right away and when he didn't get it, he trashed the claims and refused to bring it up again.

 

[Monkey Prick]

He was invited back but had to pay for special security, which wasn't part of his contract. That's damages.

But even then, it's a moot point. He wasn't supposed to have to show specifics during the TCPA hearing. The Judge fucked up.

One could also argue that paying Ty to lean on Kamehacon and negotiate that contract was also damages, even ignoring Chupp's retarded level of evidence required to pass TCPA.

But as @Immortal Technique pointed out, defamation seems to be very rare for him to deal with, let alone defamtion involving social media. Curious to see his track record with TCPA hearings.

 

[NadeND-001]

Someone mentioned a Motion for Reconsideration, but I cannot speak to that.

This is what Google spit out on the search for it:

What does motion for reconsideration mean?
A motion for reconsideration asks the judge (usually the same one) to reconsider his decision in light of other facts, circumstances, or law that wasn't brought up in the original hearing on the matter. Motions for reconsideration typically must be filed within ten days after the judge issues his order.

 

[Legioneer]

except the judge is exceptional. how do you roll with that beyond ask he get replaced/reprimanded so he knows not to pull that shit again?
Suppose its possible for the judge to pull his head from the toilet for a few minutes to realize he did something exceptional and revert it but I ain't holding my breathe. It's going to take an appeals court coming down hard on him to get him to behave like a normal person instead of a fart-huffing degenerate.

I have no practical background in this matter. We will see. But this scenario seems to me optimistic. I mean, I believe it should work like this, but does it work like this? See the picture below.

Breakaway Episcopalians win Texas church property fight

For the second time in as many months, a state court has sided with a group of breakaway Episcopalians, ruling that they can keep their property after leaving the national

www.sharonherald.com

"The ruling was an about-face for the Texas court. In 2011, Chupp had ruled in favor of the national church, basing his decision on legal precedents that deferred to internal church law when property disputes reach civil court. Episcopal Church law says parishes are held in trust for the diocese and the national church and may not secede on their own.

In 2013, however, the state Supreme Court sent the case back to Chupp’s courtroom and said it must be reheard on “neutral principles of law” that govern secular bodies."

 

[Imperial Agent]

Lemonfurher knows his "cut down a forrest to send it to a judge" strategy is a winning one with this judge. He will bloat to an even more absurd degree every motion and exhibit he can. He will make the Judge hate this case with a passion.

I have no doubt Vic's case has more papers than the rest of his entire docket combined.


J: How much did that cost you?
T: I don’t know the exact amount right now
J: ok then, it’s dismissed.

I'm not going to lie this one is bad for Ty. I know it is a fact question and not allowed under TCPA, but he should have had it anyways. He could have said 3 grand or 5 dollars and it would have been better. The judge then would have to accept it or ask for proof.


TI with prospective business was dismissed because Ty couldn’t prove Ron/Monica had anything to do with the other cancellations.

This is straight up re.tarded. How were they going to prove it if they couldn't have any discovery?

No, the judge did not seem impressed with Lemoine. He didn’t care about the Notary issue, and flat out said to Ty (about Lemoine on 230) “Yeah I don’t know what he’s talking about either.”

It did seem like hard numbers would have helped Ty.

Ty attempted to argue that he couldn’t provide affidavits from con runners because they weren’t friendly and he couldn’t compel without discovery powers.

Judge seemed to be of the mind Ty was trying to lie to him by claiming Ty couldn’t get any affidavits because Discovery Stay was in place. They clearly weren’t understanding each other.

 

[instythot]

I have no practical background in this matter. We will see. But this scenario seems to me optimistic. I mean, I believe it should work like this, but does it work like this? See the picture below.

Breakaway Episcopalians win Texas church property fight

For the second time in as many months, a state court has sided with a group of breakaway Episcopalians, ruling that they can keep their property after leaving the national

www.sharonherald.com

Leaving all the legal quotes and links aside, why the fuck are you listening to TUG on issues other than improvised mailboxes and impregnating landwhales?

 

[Superman93]

I am actually curious if Chupp has had any of the lawyers involved in his court previously. He's apparently had a history of making prejudicial judgements

Bitch, did I say he was prejudicial and had an agenda against Ty?

He has a history of making decisions before reading anything. It happened in at least 3 other separate cases. Don't bang the desk demanding proof then cry about it when you get what you ask for.

Lol that fanaticism.

Null told you faggots not to get to invested and just do this for fun. Now you re-tards are getting uppity when people are criticizing Ty for his failure and acting how you guys said the SJW's would if they would've gotten reamed by Chupp. Now you're using evidence of 3 random anons on the internet as proof of a Judge's prejudice in a case. That's quite literally the same level of proof the kickvic side used to call Vic a sexual predator. You had a problem with that but you don't have a problem with this?

 

[Legioneer]

Leaving all the legal quotes and links aside, why the fuck are you listening to TUG on issues other than improvised mailboxes and impregnating landwhales?

To be honest, I was too lazy to take my own screenshot, and I took the one that I had already (via link) and from which I learned about this article.
Because there's one more comment on it besides Tug, which is not in the article itself. And because the only thing I know about TUG is that Rekieta mentioned him a couple of times.

 

[Hoopla]

So, Vic is pretty much fucked?

 

[Imperial Agent]

So, Vic is pretty much fucked?

Won’t know until the 30th and appeals after that.

Much too early to say.

 

[Monkey Prick]

Lol that fanaticism.

Null told you faggots not to get to invested and just do this for fun. Now you re-tards are getting uppity when people are criticizing Ty for his failure and acting how you guys said the SJW's would if they would've gotten reamed by Chupp. Now you're using evidence of 3 random anons on the internet as proof of a Judge's prejudice in a case. That's quite literally the same level of proof the kickvic side used to call Vic a sexual predator. You had a problem with that but you don't have a problem with this?

Late and gayer than Elton John, @AnOminous found stuff a bit more credible than that.

I get that some of you are dying to turn the whole weeb wars section into some homegrown lolcow community to laugh at, but at least try to keep up.

 

[Superman93]

Late and gayer than Elton John, @AnOminous found stuff a bit more credible than that.

I get that some of you are dying to turn the whole weeb wars section into some homegrown lolcow community to laugh at, but at least try to keep up.

Sorry for not pro-actively tunning in to the daily autism.

 

[6’8 Nigga]

Three anonymous reviews from people who lost in court isn't proof of anything.

You sir are a fucking idiot

 

[BrandedEagle]

I have no practical background in this matter. We will see. But this scenario seems to me optimistic. I mean, I believe it should work like this, but does it work like this? See the picture below.

Breakaway Episcopalians win Texas church property fight

For the second time in as many months, a state court has sided with a group of breakaway Episcopalians, ruling that they can keep their property after leaving the national

www.sharonherald.com

Appeals courts tend to be somewhat sane (bar a few exceptions) so if the case gets tossed there we'll hear legitimate reasons rather than "I'm too fucking lazy to do my job, fuck you for taking me from the country club, now either smell my farts and say they smell nice or get the fuck out".

That said, I admit its optimistic they'll come down hard at all. It's more likely they'll tell him to hear it neutrally and fairly and that's it.... at which point Chupp will do just that and anything he can weasel out of the case he will.

So yeah... likely another ten years. Granted this is if Chupp is the lolcow I think he is, which I could be wrong on. He could just be an idiot (God knows plenty of those exist) in which case he'll just hear the case.... which means god knows how long it'll take.

 

[Slimy Time]

So yeah... likely another ten years. Granted this is if Chupp is the lolcow I think he is, which I could be wrong on. He could just be an idiot (God knows plenty of those exist) in which case he'll just hear the case.... which means god knows how long it'll take.

Really seems like everyone misread this judge. Is he another Borrock who can't be fucked to rule or read properly? Even Ramos, with a docket as large as his, bothered to read documents regarding Dick's case, including Matz's (Dick's lawyer, which he confirms in transcript) and come to a (rather easy) conclusion. I'm catching up, but it does seem like this guy did the minimum and can't be fucked.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

"Chupp is a lolcow"

You are a retard and don't know what that word means. Chupp, much more likely, probably just saw a case with a bunch of shit filings and was trying to wipe out the weakest causes of action.

I think the fact that defamation is on the table for funi/moron is actually pretty clear signalling from the judge that those are likely to pass the TCPA, especially from what I've read of the rest.

 

[Imperial Agent]

Appeals courts tend to be somewhat sane (bar a few exceptions) so if the case gets tossed there we'll hear legitimate reasons rather than "I'm too fucking lazy to do my job, fuck you for taking me from the country club, now either smell my farts and say they smell nice or get the fuck out".

That said, I admit its optimistic they'll come down hard at all. It's more likely they'll tell him to hear it neutrally and fairly and that's it.... at which point Chupp will do just that and anything he can weasel out of the case he will.

So yeah... likely another ten years. Granted this is if Chupp is the lolcow I think he is, which I could be wrong on. He could just be an idiot (God knows plenty of those exist) in which case he'll just hear the case.... which means god knows how long it'll take.

10 years?

Chupp is a Lolcow?

What is any of this based on?

 

[Sheryl Nome]

10 years?

Chupp is a Lolcow?

What is any of this based on?

We just need to get Trump to tweet #Istandwithvic, obviously

 

[Monkey Prick]

Sorry for not pro-actively tunning in to the daily autism.

Then why even come in here to chuckle and smugly post about old shit? Absolute sped.

 

[6’8 Nigga]

guys remember, it’s not how you start, it’s how you finish
~Johnny Sins