Starscream
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Ago, 2019
Maybe this case was always broadly unwinnable and the only reason a dumbass lawyer in a different field would take it is because he was a dumbass all along?
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
It was to help with legal fees, win or loss. Nothing more nothing less. Maybe read the GFM that's only been explained hundreds of times by tons of people.What Job ? By taking money just for guarantee loss ?
While you are autistically reading through legal jargon to try and process reality, read the part again where he lost his appeal.Please show where in the ruling the 2COA show's he actually did that or anywhere in this case. Where was the fact finding?
That doesn't answer my question, where is the fact finding.While you are autistically reading through legal jargon to try and process reality, read the part again where he lost his appeal.
I dunno. A lot of the opinion is "Vic references this evidence, but his doofus lawyer didn't submit it properly."Maybe this case was always broadly unwinnable and the only reason a dumbass lawyer in a different field would take it is because he was a dumbass all along?
Exactly. The decision is quite literally "We would have overturned it, if this evidence were submitted properly" with flashing neon signs pointed at exactly the evidence submitted, improperly.I dunno. A lot of the opinion is "Vic references this evidence, but his doofus lawyer didn't submit it properly."
If we didn't have the retarded Tylophone Notary arc, maybe this thread would be different
The fact is you lost. The finding lies within you.That doesn't answer my question, where is the fact finding.
I'm not the one making the claims, either post your shit or quit shitting up the thread with bullshit.The fact is you lost. The finding lies within you.
It would've got submitted properly if we gave more money to Ty and Nick. That surely would've helped, right ? right ?A lot of the opinion is "Vic references this evidence, but his doofus lawyer didn't submit it properly."
Perhaps. But it was at least good enough to get past TCPA but Ty Beard fumbled it super hard and should be mocked relentlessly for it.Maybe this case was always broadly unwinnable and the only reason a dumbass lawyer in a different field would take it is because he was a dumbass all along?
I'm not the one making the claims, either post your shit or quit shitting up the thread with bullshit.
This is true. I know I want the jackals to be punished, but I'm not the one having to live through this directly.Thats wishful thinking, frankly I don't think Mignona would -want- to go through this all again.
What the hell are you talking about?when he funneled the money directly to his friend.
It's a stupid lawtwitter meme from about 3 years ago, repeated from an obvious 2022sock.What the hell are you talking about?
Rekieta × TyroneWhat the hell are you talking about?
Wendee Lee returned to voicing Bulma for Toonami Asia's English dub of Dragon Ball Super produced by Bang Zoom. It's got nothing to do with the lawsuit.Also, when did Wendee Lee start doing Bulma's voice instead of Rial? Are the DBZ Stooges on their way out? Didn't ... whoever Maddox sue get fired like the SECOND the trial was over, even tho they won? Again, it's nothing but copium, but that'd be a funny end to all this. Sony-Funimation purges the DBZ idiots that got them into a lawsuit, which means they no longer have Sony's backing of any cancel attempts on Vic.