USPG2 Regulars vs. TES Regulars (aka Useless Nigger Wars)

[Big Shot]

I don’t have anything to add to the slapfight, but it honestly blows my mind how sheepish miggers are. They decided to shit up this thread today of all days, just because their e-daddy (Null) did it first.

In their own minds they probably see themselves as alpha males, but all I see are overgrown versions of those pissbabies who used to shout insults while hiding behind their mommy’s skirt.

 

[howtohatemyself]

Being a liar does affect the validity of what you've said.

There are plenty of liars throughout history who've espoused morals that are worth thinking about and taking on. It doesn't change the value of the idea.

Principles can change, over time. They don't change for convenience sake. You're defending changing principles for convenience sake, saying that you can hold a completely different position mere weeks later because of "context". Again, you don't understand what principles are, and aren't in a position to assert what they are seeing as you've conceded you change your principles based on convenience (which means you lie and change positions for your own benefit, which is both being dishonest and being a liar).

It's your interpretation, your interpretation, that 'miggers' changed their stance out of convenience. That's your interpretation. I see a pretty consistent logic to their thinking, even if I disagree with the notion of Australia needing second amendment rights. And disagreeing with the cheering over Pretti's death.

And principles can absolutely change out of convenience. Not a lot of the time, but they can, especially when a better world-view is offered. Again, this is your black and white thinking clouding all of this. And when did I specifically say that I, personally, change my principles based on convenience? Point it out. I said principles can be flexible and your 'balls-to-the-wall' thinking makes you interpret that as, "this guy changes principles willy-nilly, all the time. Fuck this guy." Are you a lead-foot perchance?

 

[Gatcha Gonna Getcha]

Nah, man. We need to arrest little kids, that'll show them who's boss.

Putting kids in peepee poopoo rape dungeons with the rapists, sex offenders, & pedophiles to Own The Libs™ MIGA is in their Psalm 137 8-9 arc

 

[Popper Whiting]

There are plenty of liars throughout history who've espoused morals that are worth thinking about and taking on. It doesn't change the value of the idea.

It's your interpretation, your interpretation, that 'miggers' changed their stance out of convenience. That's your interpretation. I see a pretty consistent logic to their thinking, even if I disagree with the notion of Australia needing second amendment rights. And disagreeing with the cheering over Pretti's death.

And principles can absolutely change out of convenience. Not a lot of the time, but they can, especially when a better world-view is offered. Again, this is your black and white thinking clouding all of this. And when did I specifically say that I, personally, change my principles based on convenience? Point it out. I said principles can be flexible and your 'balls-to-the-wall' thinking makes you interpret that as, "this guy changes principles willy-nilly, all the time. Fuck this guy." Are you a lead-foot perchance?

Yeah, I think I'm done here. I really don't need to say anymore. You're defending dishonesty as a virtue after you outed yourself as being a liar with no principles ( I just used your words to highlight this). Your point was to counter my assertation that miggers have no fixed principles and do what is immediately convenient, and in arguing with me you've admitted you have "flexible" principles depending on context, which is a confirmation of my original point, miggers like you do not have fixed principles and are therefore dishonest hypocrits.

The bot farms in Bangladore need to hire smarter brown people.

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

Putting kids in peepee poopoo rape dungeons with the rapists, sex offenders, & pedophiles to Own The Libs™ MIGA is in their Psalm 137 8-9 arc

"I'm ICE, boys."

 

[Popper Whiting]

I'm just going to leave this here because the entire brigading of this thread reminds me of this Murdoch Murdoch clip.

 

[Tim the Tranny]

It’s been fun watching you faggots choose to stop engaging with Null because he won’t engage with your disgusting Saul Alinsky style of discussion.

You’re in a wildly insulated echo chamber and you’re all insane. That is all. #Grenadesforbrowns

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Grenadesforbrowns

lol, bet you won't, faggot

 

[howtohatemyself]

Yeah, I think I'm done here. I really don't need to say anymore. You're defending dishonesty as a virtue after you outed yourself as being a liar with no principles ( I just used your words to highlight this). Your point was to counter my assertation that miggers have no fixed principles and do what is immediately convenient, and in arguing with me you've admitted you have "flexible" principles depending on context, which is a confirmation of my original point, miggers like you do not have fixed principles and are therefore dishonest hypocrits.

Again, you aren't addressing anything I've said -- you've interpreted "flexible" meaning "my principles only have value when it's convenient". Sounds like you're getting tired and just don't want to argue anymore. And that's fine, there's always tomorrow.

 

[inetsone]

Damnit this thread is turning civil. Faggot!

Sup, bro. How you been? I missed the fun? Fucking have to stop taking too much of my meds early evening and passing out in front of the TV.

 

[𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔]

If the result of federal agents just "doing their job" is two dead Americans within a fortnight, they should be impeded by citizens whenever possible. Collaborating with an incompetent agency will not lead to less deaths but more as proven by history. The solution to bands of incompetent, untrained Tex-Mex midgets trying to arrest people for filming them is not to just lie down and take it. You're not in China, you're in the US for fuck's sake.

I know you may find it inconceivable, but you have rights as an American citizen and so do the people protesting. The federal government cannot just infringe upon them even with excuses like "it's for national security" or "he disrespected the officer". You cannot sign away your rights no matter what. The government will never give them back.

The US was founded on fighting against this bullshit. Funny that all the self styled fucking "patriots" are fine with sucking the king's nuts as long as they're shriveled and orange enough.

When the rich faggots asked "who is going to clean your toilets" and chimped out when the illegal immigrants were brought to Martha's Vineyard, they tipped their hand about how they really view immigrants. Unfortunately, they see them as an investment and a way to divide the average joes.

Martha's vineyard is a tiny island that literally didn't have enough housing to accommodate a huge influx of people out of nowhere, its not like how cities in much of the US (especially western cities) can simply build more housing on their empty edges. Every square inch of the island is occupied. Super rich exclusive communities like that do actually have a lot of immigrants living in proximity because rich people have service staff, too.

 

[Popper Whiting]

Again, you aren't addressing anything I've said -- you've interpreted "flexible" meaning "my principles only have value when it's convenient". Sounds like you're getting tired and just don't want to argue anymore. And that's fine, there's always tomorrow.

You said lying makes what people say as equally valid as people who tell the truth and that "flexible principles" that change within days due to convenience is a good thing confirmed what I said in my original post. You argued my points for me. There is really no where to go and nothing more to add. You played yourself.

 

[Gatcha Gonna Getcha]

>LITERALLY the same as the FBI entrapping a guy, showing up to his house in a no knock raid, and instead of trying to explain what happened and de-escalate shooting his dog, wife and son

Maybe if he was a good boy & did what he was told he wouldn't have gotten into that mess in the first place hmmm? Shoulda just let them arrest him & fought it in court right? Maybe he shouldn't have modified a shotgun below the legal limit regardless of who told him to do it? Maybe he shoulda taught his son not to shoot at police? If he just followed the law & did what he was told his son would still be alive <this is what you people sound like.

"You're either with Trump or you're a democrat communist"

FIFY

 

[howtohatemyself]

You said lying makes what people say as equally valid as people who tell the truth and that "flexible principles" that change within days due to convenience is a good thing confirmed what I said in my original post. You argued my points for me. There is really no where to go and nothing more to add. You played yourself.

I said:

"There are plenty of liars throughout history who've espoused morals that are worth thinking about and taking on. It doesn't change the value of the idea."

Your interpretation:

"You said lying makes what people say as equally valid as people who tell the truth..."

There's a problem here, and it's your reading comprehension. Also, I put zero, repeat, zero time frame on the word 'flexible'. You assigned the worst possible interpretation yourself. See the above example. There is plenty to go on with and add as long as you keep saying things.

 

[AltisticRight]

Not using AI at this point is like refusing to use search engines 20 years ago and relying on public libraries.

Comparing google search AI to subscription ChatGPT is phenomenally retarded.

Wholesale rejection of information because you dont like the sources, even though it was quoting libfag sources like reuters, ap, new york times because you dont like the information presented and ignoring it is peak reddit behavior and what leftists did with fox for 30+ years.

Needs ChatGPT to calculate this:

Okay, fine. Division and square roots, that's a lot of mathematics. What's easier?
I wonder, how about using my lying eyes?

(Not obese according to you.)
No wonder you think this is a "good argument" for LLMs that are notorious for citing shit that doesn't exist, making up gibberish, and citing papers that are retracted or outdated.
The same LLMs that doesn't even know how to fucking read.

https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/vegetative-electron-microscopy-fingerprint-paper-mill/

are your eyes able to scan the 100s of actual lab results and articles within a second? or are you some fucking braindead nigger who probably works at taco bell? Youre actually the dumbest fucking nigger in this thread

The low IQ, high school dropout with no degree, no credentials and no bitches (you) think he's smart because "remove brain, inset LLM". Literal NPC golem.
Wait a second.

Woah woah cool it with all that success my nigga.

Ver archivo adjunto 8127163

Enjoy the Moslim mayor, I guess it takes less than 25 years to forget the murder of 2,000 Americans by the hands of brown pedo worshippers.

You deserve all your “success” (as well as that housing crisis, look up supply and demand sometime.)

Is this a coincidence? Two miggers, same username format, both with room temperature IQs (in Celsius) who think they're a big shot because they know "put text into chat box"? Want to get a third sock account, perhaps call it Sargon_of_Akkad or Gamer_Gate_Won this time considering how r/thedonald you are?
I can smell the curry across continents. You stink.

 

[Popper Whiting]

I said:

"There are plenty of liars throughout history who've espoused morals that are worth thinking about and taking on. It doesn't change the value of the idea."

Your interpretation:

"You said lying makes what people say as equally valid as people who tell the truth..."

There's a problem here, and it's your reading comprehension. Also, I put zero, repeat, zero time frame on the word 'flexible'. You assigned the worst possible interpretation yourself. See the above example. There is plenty to go on with and add as long as you keep saying things.

Yeah, I have reading comprehension. You defended lying and having principles change within days due to convenience with the excuse of context. Case closed. I was right in saying miggers don't have fixed principles, you were a retard and in trying to prove me wrong actually confirmed everything I said.

I also established that this lack of principles and lying coupled with cult like worship is what makes someone a migger. That people can be conservative and Pro-Trump but due to them actually having principles they stick to excludes them from being categorized as a migger.

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

It’s been fun watching you faggots choose to stop engaging with Null because he won’t engage with your disgusting Saul Alinsky style of discussion.

You’re in a wildly insulated echo chamber and you’re all insane. That is all. #Grenadesforbrowns

It's crazy that people would avoid a thread when the site owner starts trolling in it and his coterie of social media refugees follow him in. Real men would never stop sperging, that's how we know that A&N is filled with Gigachads.

 

[AltisticRight]

It’s been fun watching you faggots choose to stop engaging with Null because he won’t engage with your disgusting Saul Alinsky style of discussion.

You’re in a wildly insulated echo chamber and you’re all insane. That is all. #Grenadesforbrowns

>I... don't like that people disagree with me
>Let's see, let me find the name of some author to draw an equivalence to, I've never read book in my life but who cares
>George Orwell, Saul Alinsky, John Locke... *smug chuckles*
Okay Carl, go back to crying about troons on your gay bong podcast.

 

[Breahna]

My nigga, I have to assume at this point you just can't or won't read. A simple google search would tell you how this works. granted, I'm sure you would fuck even that up given your literal nigger tier reading comprehension skills. I don't know why you are being this willfully stupid but it just makes you seem like a chronically online stinky dude.

54% of americans have reading skills below those expected of a 6th grader. Remember that when arguing with one online, you have a weighted coinflip chance of speaking to someone who is functionality illiterate. Now remember that when speaking to miggers you're likely speaking to an inbred hick who is scared of dem big city slickers who mock his drawls, twangs and hyucks and that percentage shoots up to 80%+

 

[howtohatemyself]

Yeah, I have reading comprehension. You defended lying and having principles change within days due to convenience with the excuse of context. Case closed. I was right in saying miggers don't have fixed principles, you were a retard and in trying to prove me wrong actually confirmed everything I said.

I haven't said anything of the sort. Go back and read our conversation over the last seven hours.