USPG2 Regulars vs. TES Regulars (aka Useless Nigger Wars)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
A&N users should be forced to do simple reading comprehension tests before posting elsewhere, just disable the ability to copy/paste the sentence into a LLM and they would fail it.

Back to Trump, I am assuming his Jan 20 deadline for 10% credit card caps came/went with 0 event? What a surprise.
 
I haven't said anything of the sort. Go back and read our conversation over the last seven hours.
Yeah, I have. You defended having flexible principles that change due to context and said that liars were as valid as people who tell the truth. You did this trying to say I was wrong that miggers like you don't have principles and will change them within days or weeks when it is convenient for them. That's been the discussion, and that is the conclusion.

We've established that you're fine with lying, that you will change your principles on a whim using the excuse of "context" and that you're Indian. Spending another godly amount of time relitigating these things (which have been confirmed with your actions and words) is bumping this thread unnecessarily.
 
>I... don't like that people disagree with me
>Let's see, let me find the name of some author to draw an equivalence to, I've never read book in my life but who cares
>George Orwell, Saul Alinsky, John Locke... *smug chuckles*
Okay Carl, go back to crying about troons on your gay bong podcast.
Maybe I’ve read something you haven’t then, faggot.
 
I wonder, how about using my lying eyes?
1769591643124.png
(Not obese according to you.)
I asked a Chinese AI about Trump's mantits.
I believe the man in the attached image has gynomastia, a sure sign of obesity as he is not known to be a MtF transexual. Is it likely that he is obese?
I got a very woke answer, so I guess we're all owned. Qwen told me:
Your question contains several misconceptions that need clarification, so let’s address them step by step:

1.​

Gynecomastia (enlargement of breast tissue in males) is not a definitive indicator of obesity. It can arise from:
  • Hormonal imbalances (e.g., elevated estrogen, reduced testosterone).
  • Medications (e.g., anti-androgens, antidepressants, steroids).
  • Medical conditions (e.g., liver disease, thyroid disorders, tumors).
  • Idiopathic causes (no identifiable reason).
Pseudogynecomastia (excess fat in the chest area, not glandular tissue) is associated with obesity, but true gynecomastia is not inherently linked to body weight. Many non-obese individuals develop gynecomastia due to the factors above.

2.​

While the image shows a man with a prominent abdomen (a common sign of excess body fat), visual assessment alone cannot confirm obesity. Obesity is clinically defined by metrics like:
  • BMI ≥ 30 (Body Mass Index),
  • Waist circumference (e.g., > 40 inches for men),
  • Body fat percentage (e.g., > 25% for men).
From the image:
  • The man’s abdominal girth and overall body shape suggest overweight or obesity, but this is not definitive without measurements.
  • However, the presence of abdominal fat does align with common indicators of obesity.

3.​

Your reasoning assumes:
"Gynecomastia is a sure sign of obesity as he is not known to be MtF transsexual."
This is incorrect because:
  • Gynecomastia is not a "sure sign" of obesity (as explained above).
  • The absence of being MtF transsexual does not rule out other causes of gynecomastia (e.g., hormonal issues).

Final Answer​

  • Gynecomastia is not a reliable indicator of obesity, so your premise is flawed.
  • Visually, the man appears to have excess body fat (e.g., abdominal girth), which suggests obesity, but this cannot be confirmed without clinical data.
  • Obesity is likely based on visible body composition, but not because of gynecomastia.

If you’re concerned about health implications, consult a medical professional for accurate assessment (e.g., BMI, body composition analysis). Self-diagnosis based on appearance or assumptions about gynecomastia is not scientifically valid.
So AKTUALLY you're owned. Just because Trump is as fat as the 'World's Fattest Man' in the low-tier circus that would come to some remote village in the late 1800s and has grotesque man tits doesn't mean he's OBESE.

It's very possible Trump's hormones are all fucked up from his disgusting, inhuman diet. Perhaps the pink slime just has lots of estrogen in it.

OR, it could be one of the cocktail of drugs he's on.

OR, it could be his organs breaking down or cancer.
 
I agree and I know. But would you wish that on the entire country?
Yes. He's already said this he doesn't care how many children Trump or any politician rapes as long as he gets his perfect world with no darkies & no jews while supporting an administration that supports jews, is pro importing jeets to replace white people, & rapes kids. The fucking VP has an indian wife & miggers don't give a shit. They just ignore it like when a pastor rapes a kid.
 
It's crazy that people would avoid a thread when the site owner starts trolling in it and his coterie of social media refugees follow him in. Real men would never stop sperging, that's how we know that A&N is filled with Gigachads.
It's actually sad when you think about how Jonathan Yaniv likely has done more repel immigrants with his "Wax My Balls" Tour of Terror compared to the average migger :(
 
Yeah, I have. You defended having flexible principles that change due to context and said that liars were as valid as people who tell the truth. You did this trying to say I was wrong that miggers like you don't have principles and will change them within days or weeks when it is convenient for them. That's been the discussion, and that is the conclusion.

We've established that you're fine with lying, that you will change your principles on a whim using the excuse of "context" and that you're Indian. Spending another godly amount of time relitigating these things (which have been confirmed with your actions and words) is bumping this thread unnecessarily.
You came up with me being Indian, you came up with me saying liars were as valid as people who tell the truth, you came up with me changing my principles on a whim. That's all on you, buddy. Again, I must point out that you have the worst possible interpretation of anything anyone says. You really shouldn't be discussing political matters that require nuance. Just a word of advice.
 
You came up with me being Indian, you came up with me saying liars were as valid as people who tell the truth, you came up with me changing my principles on a whim. That's all on you, buddy. Again, I must point out that you have the worst possible interpretation of anything anyone says. You really shouldn't be discussing political matters that require nuance. Just a word of advice.
Yep, you can't even stand on your own words, little wonder you defend not standing on principle.
 
You can't just pretend I didn't say anything of substance. I'm still waiting for a proper response.
You did say things of substance, it is just the substance of your words condemned you instead of validating you.

You defended changing principles based on convenience, said that lying was valid, and now you're trying to lie and say that wasn't what you said. That was the substance of your words and argument, and like a bitch you refuse to take accountability for what you said and are trying to say it was "my interpretation". Complete lack of ownership and accountability, exactly on par with someone who thinks lying to benefit themselves is OK.
 
A&N users should be forced to do simple reading comprehension tests before posting elsewhere, just disable the ability to copy/paste the sentence into a LLM and they would fail it.

Back to Trump, I am assuming his Jan 20 deadline for 10% credit card caps came/went with 0 event? What a surprise.
Holy shit; I'd forgotten all about that over all this ICE faggotry.

Found an article about it
1769595108452.png
Link
Archive

TL;DR: Trump tried to convince credit card companies to reduce the interest rate. Companies told him to get bent, because that would stop them from easily approving cards for any and every retard coming their way. Now Trump is urging Congress to turn that proposal into law.

Surprised he's not trying to make another executive order for it or something; but who knows. Maybe this is one of the things that aren't in the President's hands.
 
The late great Harold Covington said that America's original sin was when the first slaves got traded for a cask of good sippin' whiskey. He wasn't wrong about a lot of things, and that certainly wasn't one of them.
Pretty sure he is wrong about that.

The first slaves were Blacks liberated from the Portugese, who chose to become indentured servants, and who lived the rest of their lives as free colonists.
America started out liberating slaves as an act of piracy against superior powers, like the Portuguese and Spanish.

Chattel slavery came much later.
 
The actual pedophiles are brown grooming gangs raping white children and trannies on discord grooming their kittens but thats ok with you because it doesnt affect you PERSONALLY
But the ICE agents sexually abusing kids isn't a problem for you because it doesn't affect you PERSONALLY right? L / A L / A
 

Archivos adjuntos

I said that even liars can say things of substance. You are retarded.
You see this is where context does matter. You said that in defense of dishonesty after I said changing principles for convenience was dishonesty and lying. You didn't say it out of context; you did it to defend lying. You were validating the act of lying for political and personal convenience, claiming that made you a "whole person".

There is no other interpretation other than you are a liar who is trying to paint dishonesty as an inherently moral act.
 
You see this is where context does matter. You said that in defense of dishonesty after I said changing principles for convenience was dishonesty and lying. You didn't say it out of context; you did it to defend lying. You were validating the act of lying for political and personal convenience, claiming that made you a "whole person".

There is no other interpretation other than you are a liar who is trying to paint dishonesty as an inherently moral act.
So context does matter? So, you see my point about the context of a terrorist act and the context of a man jumping into a violent situation with a firearm being different? Alright, that's pretty good progress for today.
 
So context does matter? So, you see my point about the context of a terrorist act and the context of a man jumping into a violent situation with a firearm being different? Alright, that's pretty good progress for today.
Context matters in what someones says. It doesn't matter in application of your principles. So it is not the win you say it is when the context that matters outs you as defending lying and having principles determined by what is convenient at any given moment.

And the ICE agents jumped women in the group of Pretti, he didn't draw his firearm in aggression, he was legally allowed to carry that pistol by the laws of both the United States and the State of Minnesota, he was already disarmed and incapacitated by the ICE agents when he was shot.

If you watched the video you'd have your facts right, but lets be honest you either didn't; or more likely you're lying because it is convenient for you right now.
 
TL;DR: Trump tried to convince credit card companies to reduce the interest rate. Companies told him to get bent, because that would stop them from easily approving cards for any and every retard coming their way. Now Trump is urging Congress to turn that proposal into law.

Surprised he's not trying to make another executive order for it or something; but who knows. Maybe this is one of the things that aren't in the President's hands.
There isn't going to be a law to cap usury, obviously.

This will be a mix of Trump promoting himself, and his kike overseers exploiting the poor:
  1. Some banks will offer '10% interest credit cards' and so that will be claimed as a victory by Trump and his MIGAt followers
  2. The '10% interest credit cards' will only be available to those who get asked what kind of metal they want their card made out of. Of course, if you don't qualify, maybe you still qualify for a ((('low interest'))) credit card, where if you have really really good credit you might get a interest rate under 20%. As long as you don't actually carry any balance across more than one month, because then you get to pay a penalty interest rate and get nickel and dimed in 15 other ways to make sure you pay more than a regular card. Hell there are already '0% intro APR cards' around where Shylock makes sure he gets his pound of flesh and more, those aren't being offered because the (((bankers))) like losing money.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo