US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Última edición:
Iowa was always going to be stupidly in Trump's favour this year. Did everyone already forget about the DMR poll that was desperately buried after Harris' campaign start showing him with a 15+ lead?
Well who took the manufacturing jobs away? Biden. Not Trump. That is half the state's GDP practically. Biden and Kamala put a fuckload of people out of a job in Iowa. Lets not get into farming.
 
The biggest issue for demographics isn't latinos, but moreso retarded africans, incestuous muzzies, and slimey indians. If those gain any significant foothold on American politics, then we're doubly fucked
Too late. It's Canadian Jeet vs Guy with VP married to a Jeet. They already run all our major corporations, why shouldn't they run our politics too?
What if the Trump campaign did release the Peanut meme?
Sure would be funny if Peanut the Squirrel puts Drumpf in the fortification-proof zone. Better fire up those ballot printers fast Dems!
 
Reminder: this guy is still President!
Let us be real here: Obama is president. If Kamala wins Obama stays president.

That is one conspiracy theory that I actually buy into. Even if it is not him directly it is appointees and employees Trump failed to purge. I think it is one of the reasons they have been so loud about Trump purging this time which he will do.

If they have their little faggots entrenched another four years of Trump is only damage. If they are driven out of government it is catastrophic.
 
Iowa was always going to be stupidly in Trump's favour this year. Did everyone already forget about the DMR poll that was desperately buried after Harris' campaign start showing him with a 15+ lead?
The story is Ann Selzer's final Iowa poll is supposed to be released tonight, and if she's honest it will be Trump 10+, which means the other rust belt states are ripples in support by comparison. But Selzer has become such a hack there is talk she will gimp the poll for copium for democrats, like she did earlier this year (and in 2020 for the democrats in the primary).

We're going to see if Selzer is willing to destroy her name for liberal cummies, and then just retire, or maintain integrity when it's make or break time.
 
I think the real question right now is wherever record early vote for reps eill drain the ED vote, and if so by how much.
Mark Mitchell, from Rasmussen Reports, talks about it. He doesn't think so. The number of likely early voters is up but the number of ED voters are also higher for Trump.

"If the Democrats go into election day down (lower number of ED likely voters) at all, they're not gonna be able to dig themselves out of that hole, unless they magically find more mail-in ballots."

At 10:13:
 
We're going to see if Selzer is willing to destroy her name for liberal cummies, and then just retire, or maintain integrity when it's make or break time.
IMO it's more coercion than influence in her case. She broke under the pressure in 2020 and hasn't been the same since which is a real disappointment given how significant a barometer her organization has been for Iowa as a whole.

Becoming quite ironic that Baris of all people is arguably the most objective these days because he's fully willing to show the raw numbers and their sampling methodology and (barring his personal biases) make no excuses for any of it.
 
The story is Ann Selzer's final Iowa poll is supposed to be released tonight, and if she's honest it will be Trump 10+, which means the other rust belt states are ripples in support by comparison. But Selzer has become such a hack there is talk she will gimp the poll for copium for democrats, like she did earlier this year (and in 2020 for the democrats in the primary).

We're going to see if Selzer is willing to destroy her name for liberal cummies, and then just retire, or maintain integrity when it's make or break time.
The Emerson poll is deliberately making a play for contrast and credibility from this election by releasing their result hours before Selzer.
 
Note, he's not actually saying one way or another if the squirrel was actually innocent. It was 'innocent by all accounts", but I won't be shocked to discover Peanut's a rapist/criminal. But probably not. After all, some squirrels are good people.
Peanut was a red squirrel, the bad ones are black. The funny thing, i'm only half joking..

https://www.cleveland.com/metro/201...quirrels-spreading-across-northeast-ohio.html
archive
Nigger squirrels are invasive as fuck.
 
Even if you disagree with Trump every one needs to vote for him since he has a pretty good chance of appointing another SC (or more) in his next term. Thomas and Alito are both in their 70s and might choose retirement if they know they have a successor they like and Sotomayer is a 68 diabetic hispanic.

And then another round of federal judges that will help keep the crazy down.
Trump humself was a bit meh when it came to things like 2A (I remember the bumpstock ban), but his judges have put in work, SCOTUS, circuit, or district.

Of course part of it was RBG's hubris. We would hav never gotten Coney Island Barrett if she had stepped down during Obama.
 
Última edición:
his judges have put in work
Sort of. Clarence Thomas is the tip of the spear for recent 2A wins. If Trump gets a 2nd term, Thomas is most likely going to retire. If Trump doesn't replace him with an extremely pro-gun judge, the 2a victories will start to fade. Most of the republicans on the court are Fudds that aren't strict textualists. They will never touch the NFA, 80's machine gun bans, or import restrictions regardless of how blatantly unconstitutional they are. Who Trump picks to replace Thomas will dictate gun legislation probably for the rest of my lifetime.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo