what did you do to the burrito to make it wet, you sick fuck
While the America parallel of "taxation without representation" is apt, what I see even moreso is that this is almost the exact same set of circumstances that caused the Breakup of Yugoslavia (even the ethnic tensions!)
Ok you're big mad. What will YOU do about it? Because this isn't doing anything. Rate me whatever you want, but I'm seriously asking here.
Oh agreed. But that would just be American classical liberalism or capitalism. The Roman Republic was fascist indeed by the original definition. Granted even that version is idealized. But by the classical definition simply pledging your allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible(important word here), with liberty and justice for all. Would fit. As it is a classical fascist motto after all.
Nothing I could do.
Ideologically, there's actually no definition of what fascism is. It's not like communism where they wrote pages and pages and pages of socialist and communist theory. Fascism it's a mess. There is no set definition. The closest to " to pure modern fascism" (which is what most people are thinking of when they talk about fascism) isn't Nazi Germany; it's Mussolini's Italy. But even then there wasn't very clear ideological through line.
Now I'm picturing Donald Trump spasming all over a McDonald's floor screaming "REEEEE!!!! PICKLE REEEEEEEE!!!".
We would have had crashes but boomers in charge refused to let another happen in their lives. Hence them pushing it off until 2030.
This is why I say Canada will never willingly allow Saskatchewan or Alberta to leave. China has also worked too hard to allow those cash cows to slip out of their grasp.
Redeem samosa
But it's vastly different. The United States tried the Independent states in a single Union under the article's confederation and it was a mess to say it lightly. Canada does not have that. It's an Anglo country, it's one unified culture effectively. One unified government effectively just copy pasted from England onto the mass of land that is Canada. The United States also at least on paper does not Grant the federal government that much power, and what power the federal government does have was delegated to it by the state representatives. At any point the states could say that they don't want to give the power to the feds. Canada doesn't have that.
Secessionists in Canada should prepare for the possibility that the Canadian government may try to stop provinces from leaving by using the military.
Yeah but there's a set theory that was built off of it. It and it was Marx and Engle (sorry I'm using voice to text so things might be a bit weird), there is a central book, it's das Kapital and the Communist manifesto. The different types of socialism and fascism are still all rooted in the same ideological foundation that being Marx wrote up. If you look at fascism there really isn't a clear definition of what it is. All countries that said that were fascist had wildly different interpretations. The most pure is probably Italy and the least pure are the Germans.
I am taking purely philosophically here. In reality, it's a completely different thing.
Well in theory, you can say anything I suppose. I understood your meaning, but even the theory of socialism to communism it is all insane materialism in the end.
I think you are completely missing the point about what I was talking about.
Maybe, I'm tired. It sounded like you're positing socialism as some sort of positive thing. That's a very bad move to open with and has to be stomped out entirely.
