Is he really dead if he can show up in Candace Owens' dreams?
I'm not upset at anything, I'm simply pointing out the absurdity of your position that Israel was opposed to the war because the Prime Minster gave some general advice. If he or anyone else high up in the Israel government thought the war would be a serious risk to Israel security or interests, they would have said so. Which might have convinced Bush to not launch the invasion. Look just post Ariel Sharon's exact words about not wanting Bush to invade Iraq.
So just to be clear, Israel fully believed Saddam was producing or had WMDs? The same Israel that openly bombed Saddam's nuclear program back in the eighties? You honestly expect me to believe they were opposed to the war when they thought a man who had targeted Israel in the past, had killed Israelis in the past was about to have or had WMDs? That they would be perfectly happy for Saddam to have WMDs, but somehow not with Iran getting them right now?
Vassal states do not preemptively launch wars forcing their hegemon to advance their own timetables. Little Marco Rubio himself got up in front of the press and said as much. Which was reported in this very thread.
If the routes were using air, they weren't going through Iraq.
That was always the plan with the F-22s, if I recall. You see the AWACS and your first hint the F-22s are there is when the bays open and suddenly missiles, and you rely on the AWACS, not the F-22s active radar. Outside of exercises anyways, but it does sounds like the pilots who've gotten to fly the F-35 love them, it's had teething problems, but quite a bit less than the F-16's. Of course, the US bullshits in the other direction with military capabilities, we tend to underplay what our stuff can do. No need to fluff up a tiny yellow dick.
read the original article i linked which explicitly addresses that
Italy's greece adventure?
One has to wonder what is currently going through the heads of Chinese military planners now they have two solid examples of their hardware being useless. Taiwan might as well be on the far side of the pacific if the Chinese can't reasonably contest its own airspace, let alone the air space of the western pacific. Guam and Okinawa will be our unsinkable aircraft carriers, and the stealth boys will own the airspace from them to Tibet. Fuck we might even base jets from same bases currently hitting Iran for targets in western China. To be a Chinese speaking fly on the wall in one of those meetings right now...
To be fair to Matt, he's had a bit of redemption arc. At the very least Orcbrand, of the famous "The Racist Community is tolerant," meme, who lives at 210 Main Street, Poughkeepsie, NY, thinks he's okay these days. I mean, I'm not really picking his side, but if he's going after Loomer and Greenwald, I'll cheer him on.
don't you worry about which base we'll launch on western china from. we're gonna build a big, beautiful base in Iran. It's gonna be huge. I'm telling you, bigger than you've ever seen before. The biggest military base of all time. The Chinese are gonna be able to see it from space with their fuzzy little cameras.
I know of Greenwald and Loomer but what's the deal with Forney?
Will the warlords post Xi use nukes on eachother? Knowing Chinese civil wars, yes.
It's part of why I think China really wants Taiwan to come back to the fold politically or economically. But the saber rattling about taking the island is important for domestic consumption. No one really wants to find out if China's an 800 pound gorilla or a paper tiger, especially China.
There are a shitload of variables at play here. When you hear that an F35 has the same radar cross section as a sparrow it just means that it is harder to see at distances they would not be able to hit it at anyway. Even chinesium radar running on vibe coded software will probably be suspicious of the sparrow that is moving at 500 knots and (possibly) blasting out radio signals of its own.
Literally nothing here says "Don't invade Iraq." "Don't occupy Iraq" is not the same as "Don't go in and topple Saddam." "Iran is the bigger threat" is not the same "don't invade Iraq and topple Saddam." You want to make the argument Israel favored going Tehran first rather than Baghdad, fine. Doesn't change the fact Ariel didn't tell Bush invading Iraq was a bad idea. Doesn't change the fact Israel all the reason in the world to see Saddam toppled.
You gave me a quote, you didn't link the article. The quote said inspectors believed Iraq was disarmed, and Israel having the best military intelligence would have been in a position to gauge that. Of course, if that were the case, Ariel would have been very clear with Bush that Iraq wasn't a problem, that curveball was bullshit, and that wasting time deposing Saddam could have been better spent invading Iran. Somebody in Israel believed Curveball was true.
Lol, seriously? Again if Israel was America's vassal, they would not have launch preemptive strikes.
it's confusing as hell to me too. Last I knew him and loomer were going after tyler for making the video on scamming jews.