US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I keep getting the impression that there's way too much Potekmin going on from BRICs and Islamic sources.
Well, the Russians lie as SOP, but they're usually reasonable lies. China lies about everything to look like Number One. India is always full of shit, but usually incompetently so. No one cares about Brazil or South Africa, they don't matter much on the geopolitical front. Muslims like to fluff themselves up. It's all a lot of bullshit, but the F-35s, both ours and Israeli models, have been doing a lot of heavy lifting, so imagine you're China and your knock off SAMs and super duper Anti-Stealth radar haven't don't shit for Venezuela and Iran. That's gonna hurt the Chinamen right in the Chink Izzat. Lots of people are going to owe the F-35 apologies, the program got stupid, but the product it delivered appears to be better than the program.

Also, we finally found a use for the LCS, the navy has put mine-countermeasure modules and drones on them and has them doing that. Might get some real use out of them.
 
Interesting timing, huh?
Ver archivo adjunto 8721438
Maybe our boy Kent will start a fundraiser for his legal fees?
I don't see anybody else reporting this and I have no idea who Shelby Talcott is. But a google search shows that she works for a publication named Semafor. This publication, according to wikipedia, was founded by Buzzfeed and funded by Sam Bankman-Fried, MasterCard, and Pfizer. Oh, and many members of its editorial board have known high level relationships with the CCP.

Are those people you deem trustworthy?
 
did they really believe it worked in the first place? i wonder if it worked on the J-20 and that's why they thought it would work on the F-22, they were just outright saying with no data that they could definitely detect American stealth aircraft by assuming that it was equivalent to their 'gen 5'. I don't believe China ever showed any evidence of those radars being capable. this suggests to me that the j-20s are probably not actually stealthy, and would not in any way hold up in a dogfight against even an F-35, let alone an F-22.
Well, some of us have argued that putting canards on a "stealth" aircraft is a...bold design choice. Not that F-22s or F-35s should be getting into dogfights, their combat data networking is impressive enough that the first time you know an F-35 can drop you is when the missile it fired at you turns it's own radar on. They're also better at dogfighting now than they were earlier in their testing, some of the issues they had were from deliberately limiting their flight profile to slowly work up to what the airframe is actually capable of, not what the egg heads think it can do.
 
Well, some of us have argued that putting canards on a "stealth" aircraft is a...bold design choice. Not that F-22s or F-35s should be getting into dogfights, their combat data networking is impressive enough that the first time you know an F-35 can drop you is when the missile it fired at you turns it's own radar on. They're also better at dogfighting now than they were earlier in their testing, some of the issues they had were from deliberately limiting their flight profile to slowly work up to what the airframe is actually capable of, not what the egg heads think it can do.
the main limitation is the ability for the pilot to stay conscious during tight maneuvers, the air frame of fighter jets have been able to sustain more G's than a human body since the 60s.
 
I don't see anybody else reporting this and I have no idea who Shelby Talcott is. But a google search shows that she works for a publication named Semafor. This publication, according to wikipedia, was founded by Buzzfeed and funded by Sam Bankman-Fried, MasterCard, and Pfizer. Oh, and many members of its editorial board have known high level relationships with the CCP.

Are those people you deem trustworthy?
Fox reported yesterday that he was shut out of the White House because of how much he leaked classified information. Good enough for you?
 
The Navy decommissioned half of its mine countermeasure ships last year and began replacing them with littoral combat ships that possess anti-mine capabilities so they better be good.
I suppose the good news is that if they did get sunk, it's just an LCS and the biggest loss would be the crew. The Avengers were getting pretty old. Supposedly they have all kind of drone stuff so we don't have to send people in harm's way, we'll find out but I hope they do work out. It would be nice to find a good use for the LCS.
 
I don't see anybody else reporting this and I have no idea who Shelby Talcott is. But a google search shows that she works for a publication named Semafor. This publication, according to wikipedia, was founded by Buzzfeed and funded by Sam Bankman-Fried, MasterCard, and Pfizer. Oh, and many members of its editorial board have known high level relationships with the CCP.

Are those people you deem trustworthy?
1773882165609.png
Not the only ones saying it. They do use her as a source but it's not just one random person saying it anymore.
 
Well, some of us have argued that putting canards on a "stealth" aircraft is a...bold design choice. Not that F-22s or F-35s should be getting into dogfights, their combat data networking is impressive enough that the first time you know an F-35 can drop you is when the missile it fired at you turns it's own radar on. They're also better at dogfighting now than they were earlier in their testing, some of the issues they had were from deliberately limiting their flight profile to slowly work up to what the airframe is actually capable of, not what the egg heads think it can do.
No one will ever get to dogfight one

If a MiG ever gets close enough we've failed in what's called our "Layered Defense Architecture", which is exactly what it sounds like
 
If we're talking predictions of the Iran conflict, I do believe the original timeline which I believe was 1-2 months is what was the plan from the get go.
The reason why the timeline kept getting pushed back in subsequent statements is because journalists pushed for a specific date so that Iran can just wait out the conflict, which is obviously not something you want to signal to your enemy.
So most likely the US will start to wind down it's actions in the area by mid-april.

Irans neighbors will buckbreak them into stop fucking with global trade and Iran will inform its lackeys, Tucker included, that the new talking point is that Iran won the conflict because the US bombed them and then left.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo