US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
A real protest is when you're actually being a nuisance to the government while being peaceful so that if the government and not stopping until you get your way or the government makes an ass of itself dispersing you. The fact that Liberals get permission to protest from the government, show up to listen to some losers speak and then disperse proves that they don't know how to protest. Compare that to the Canadian protests over vaccine requirements where they were disruptive to parliament for two months, forced the Prime Minister into hiding and was ultimately only dispersed through government overreach when they fucked with the United States economy.
There is a difference between protest being done with purpose and protest being done as a performance. All this No Kings nonsense amounts to is a glorified political pep rally that accomplishes nothing legally but gives liberal news outlets something to talk about.
 
I agree we shouldn't have kings, lets kick out the people who have been in politics for 40-50 years at this point.
Like Schumer
 
A real protest is when you're actually being a nuisance to the government while being peaceful so that if the government and not stopping until you get your way or the government makes an ass of itself dispersing you. The fact that Liberals get permission to protest from the government, show up to listen to some losers speak and then disperse proves that they don't know how to protest. Compare that to the Canadian protests over vaccine requirements where they were disruptive to parliament for two months, forced the Prime Minister into hiding and was ultimately only dispersed through government overreach when they fucked with the United States economy.
I might sound like a conspiracy nut saying this, but after an extreme fed-posting incident involving mentions of weapons of mass destruction and believable threat involving the production of them, I got extremely Black Pilled on the entire "anti-vaxxx" protest movement. The agents that showed up to investigate were organizers of such protests, I recognized from having been very active in the protests. The fed-posting incident was about the entire coof authoritarian totalitarian policy and I suppose the goal was to let me have a look behind the veil to let me know
dude it was all a show, calm down.
 
It must really suck to be downwind from these "protests." You can't tell me most of these people don't stink, you can almost smell some of them through the pics.
 
You know how every modern musical has adopted the same fast-tempo songs with anachronistic, "adorkable" lyrics and "relatable" slang?
Yeah, you can thank Hamilton for that. Lin-Manuel Miranda popularized that oh so quirky style of songwriting, and everyone has been ripping it off since, including himself.
No can't say that I have since I'm not a gay theater fag. I think the most recently produced musical I have seen was Les Miserables (which is inferior to the Victor Hugo book)
 
I've been in bigger crowds in DC.
That is a metric fuckton in Boston though. Where did all the little protests go? The two towns near me that had them last time (and one was def. scheduled) did not happen. Did they just go to the bigger cities instead?
Also why are THEY escalating after Kirk? This does not end how you want it.
They gave up on the little protests because they had no energy to them and it was just boomers having a fun day at the park chatting and hitting Trump themed piñatas and shit. Even if the amount of people participating are the same in both events, having everybody concentrated in a few cities makes for better photos.

Also I guess the dem's post loss civil war mellowed out because suddenly they have money to pay for this shit again. It seems they got a plan of attack that their donors are willing to finance.
 
They gave up on the little protests because they had no energy to them and it was just boomers having a fun day at the park chatting and hitting Trump themed piñatas and shit. Even if the amount of people participating are the same in both events, having everybody concentrated in a few cities makes for better photos.

Also I guess the dem's post loss civil war mellowed out because suddenly they have money to pay for this shit again. It seems they got a plan of attack that their donors are willing to finance.
I think it is Soros money out of desperation to try to derail the investigation into him for RICO charges. There are a LOT of wealthy people on the left who could be taken down over their financial support of ANTIFA and related orgs, and you know they will be sweating as long as Trump is in charge.
 
Última edición:
They definitely didn't get the numbers they wanted:

How The Times Covers Crowds: Focusing on the Content, Not the Count​

When reporting from protests, campaign events or other gatherings, we want to bring readers into the action on the ground.​

1760829261033.png
A crowd gathers near the Lincoln Memorial. Jason Andrew for The New York Times

By Susanna Timmons
Susanna Timmons is an editor on the Trust team, which focuses on the transparency and the credibility of our work.
May 1, 2025, 1:28 p.m. ET

Estimating the size of a gathering is an inexact science. There are techniques and best attempts that may approach accuracy, but determining how many people are attending an open event is difficult. And, typically that is not the focus of our reporting.

We cover the action, the people, the mood and, yes, the scope. But rather than counting heads, we encourage reporters to describe what they see: “Marchers filled 15 blocks,” “jammed the streets” and “packed so tightly at times that they could barely move.” Our photo and video teams add a visual layer that lets readers see for themselves.

We will usually give a rough estimate (hundreds, thousands, millions) of the crowd size based on what a location capacity is, how many people signed up for an event, what the police who are working crowd control tell us and what our reporters witness. This estimate, like those from other organizations, is not free from controversy.

In 2017, our graphics team wrote about how crowds at presidential inaugurations have been counted for the past 150 years. This piece also includes why the National Park Service no longer gives official estimates of those crowds.

When a story becomes more about the size of the crowd than about the actual event, we investigate. Our data and graphics teams report and analyze as they did in this article comparing rally sizes of the 2024 presidential candidates. The methodology at the end of the piece illustrates the work it takes to get beyond an estimate.

If you have a question for our newsroom or feedback on our coverage, please reach out here.
Source (Archive)
 
Atrás
Top Abajo