I wouldn't take the endorsement from the bitch that ordered the killing of Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Racoon as a good sign....
I'm not sure they will crack down on it. Remember, its a core tenant of the progressive stack that the less involved must at least actively back, support, and body block for the fucking crazies. They're going to dig their heels in, every moment along the way, and use it as a radicalizing moment for all the less involved. Covering for the crazies will make their lives hell, and any of them that don't break free of it will blame everyone else, not the crazies, for it getting worse for them.
Right now it is political suicide to back a riot. They already tried the political stunts and got btfo. If you think the corpo's like Reddit will stand and die on the sword of the US gov to protect a faggot like Bardfinn and the rest of the fed posting troons and nutters. I do not know what could convince you otherwise. Half of the corpo's did not turn up for Pride month this year. But now they are suddenly going to wrap up spastic commie faggots in protection? Don't think so.
The margins in both houses are razor-thin and any defections from squishy Rs will torpedo a bill, even before we get to the subject of the filibuster.
Probably nothing other than continuing down the same path of decline that the city is currently on as the productive American population shrinks year after year.
Not to give you shit, but the word you're looking for is "tenet." A tenant leases a property; a tenet is a core doctrine or principle.
Do you think any of them would dare go against a CHARLIE bill that cracks down on the people who want to shoot and kill anyone with a R next to their name?
They absolutely would. The boomers and the lolberts would 100% sink it.
A district judge would block the law, and rule that the poop be shoved back inside.
I don't think so. Not after the public outcry. The thing about these boomers. They love staying in power over any other conviction. It would be political suicide to go against it, and they would end up getting primaryed in the midterms.
If he deletes the gang database and makes it so police don't go after lower level crime we need to make Escape from New York real.
You are correct, but I counter that I think its funnier for it to be living rent free in their heads, because we all know its not principles that are driving them. But yes, typo, they happen in my posts a lot and I apologize for it, very much a stream of consciousness poster here.
Its less that we're not in power, its more that the power structures we have aren't capable of effective action. In short, the perception is the left constantly gets away with shit, because the institutions refuse to prosecute and pursue as a matter of course. Rioters get let loose, violent criminals get let loose, any attempt to use lawful presidential authority gets overruled by some random two bit judge for months, and the nature of the system makes it exceedingly difficult to root out these bad actors driving these outcomes.
"How has a yield curve not resulted in a recession?"
But all these judge injunctions are not stopping the ball rolling they are just delaying it. Because it has happened like this every time now
Conservatives tend to value systems, institutions and rules. We tend to find it fundamentally disgusting when they're actively twisted, especially since our only recourse is hoping that someone with a bigger stick agrees as you point out. Especially since historically, the precedent has been the person with a bigger stick is also a clown and backs it, that's half of what got people here today.
I understand what you say. But the level of its over i see is just not reality. I mean what, they have """""resisted""""" Trump on everything. Yet he has passed everything he wanted to get passed. Deported everyone he wanted to deport. The rival party has self destructed after having tantrums about not being let in to buildings and doing other insane political stunts that have all backfired.
This basically doesn't happen. The President is not a legislature unto himself. I know the state of American civics knowledge is pretty dismal, but you're coming across as a furriner making big claims about US politics when you don't actually understand it, much like Fapcop.
