Culture University racism study criticised for including anti-white harassment - Black Students’ officer at the National Union of Students: "‘anti-white prejudice’ should have no place in a report on racial harassment"

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...dy-criticised-including-anti-white-harassment

Prominent academics and student leaders have criticised the government’s equalities watchdog for including prejudice against white British students in its inquiry into racism in UK universities.

They accused the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) of drawing a false equivalence between what it described as racial harassment against white British students and staff and the racism suffered by their black and minority ethnic peers.

According to the watchdog’s student survey, 9% of white British students experienced racial harassment, compared with 29% of black students and 27% of Asian students.

The report, Tackling Racial Harassment: Universities Challenged, highlighted examples of anti-English sentiment at Scottish and Welsh universities.

A white English member of staff told the inquiry that two Welsh colleagues used a slur when referring to English people: “She was speaking in English and changed to Welsh for that word thinking I wouldn’t understand. I’ve never come across so much racism as when I moved to Wales.”

Heidi Mirza, a visiting professor of race, faith and culture at Goldsmiths, University of London, said the EHRC’s inclusion of anti-British sentiment watered down the impact of racism on people of colour.

“Anti-black, anti-Asian and Islamophobic and antisemitic racism is on a different scale to the anti-English sentiment,” she said. “The experience that the Scottish and the Welsh students might experience will not equate to what skin colour and visible difference means to students on campus.”


Fope Olaleye, the black students’ officer at the National Union of Students, said the EHRC had ignored pleas made at a roundtable event with the inquiry team earlier this year to exclude anti-white harassment from their report.

She tweeted: “I remember sitting at one of the round tables and a bunch of students and myself had to explain in excruciatingly detail that ‘anti-white prejudice’ should have no place in a report on racial harassment but I see we were not listened to.”

She later added: “There was a definite tension with the students in the room who were concerned by how they were defining racism in the report and many of us pressed and challenged it.”

Gargi Bhattacharyya, professor of sociology at the University of East London, said similar concerns had been raised with the EHRC by the University College Union’s black member’s standing committee.

She tweeted: “We had a similar awkward convo with them. And sent written notes to remind them of our concerns on this issue.”

An EHRC spokeswoman said its report made clear that racial harassment predominantly affects black and Asian students.

She added: “We received a small number of examples of anti-English sentiment at Scottish and Welsh universities, offensive comments about Gypsy and Irish Traveller students and examples of anti-Semitic slurs for both staff and students. To ignore these issues raised with us would have been wrong. Our recommendations are designed to ensure that universities can appropriately address and tackle racial harassment in all of its forms.”
 
Sorry UK. You got coloreds. Brexit is fine but too little too late. Diversity is disaster. White ethnostate the only way.

To be fair, most white identity types are equally exceptional, but at least they have the balls to admit they're racist instead of hiding it behind notions of "justice."
 
I love how little self-awareness there is amongst the outrage mob.

The backlash against this report IS AN EXAMPLE of anti-white racism. Look in a fucking mirror!
 
To be fair, most white identity types are equally exceptional, but at least they have the balls to admit they're racist instead of hiding it behind notions of "justice."

Well if you are a white nationalist you do not think of racism as a negative thing so it renders denying it kind of a moot point.

The left tried the same with Yakub.... but they have problems backing up any claim of racial superiority with even the shakiest of evidence, beside "We wuz kangz an shieeet" so they instead opt for social justice.
Being the best at rap music and crack dealing does not hold a candle to inventing almost every invention and discovering almost every discovery. If we had a promiment, powerful ancient black civilisation with ruins and half corroded steam engines from a thousand years ago, they would not need to invent their "justice" .
Whites can point to Europe, even Chinks can say they had a great wall to back up some claims of great civilisation, but Wakanda, alas, is not real.

Its like arguing whose horse is the best in the race, and Jamal shows up with an MLP drawing.

I'm not even saying that one race should dominate all. Live and let live, all in the places where they are. Adapatation is a thing. But ragging always on the one group that did the most is really counter productive.
 
Última edición:
Oh right, the Bait.


The Bait for Anon.
The Bait especially chosen to trigger Anon.
Anon's Bait.

Still think we could use stickers for "obvious bait" and "high quality bait."

The summary says they included microaggressions in their racism survey so even if they included white students at the dismay of the race whiners, it sounds pretty useless to me. Still, it's always good for the soul to see woke bitching about people who refuse to adopt the newspeak. If you don't accept their misuse of terms like "racism" and "violence" they have no power whatsoever.
 
They obfuscate what is ultimately a very simple point: making insults and attacks on people based on their race is either okay or it's not. These people have basically decided "it's okay for me to judge someone guilty because of their race because someone else of their race already did it". Which is literal racist prejudice. Claiming "well us pocs aren't as privileged as you so we're just not capable of hitting as hard when we do it, therefore you can take it" is an absurd position because you plainly want to close that gap and make sure pocs have as much political and social power as whites, so stop training them to think racism is okay for them!
 
They obfuscate what is ultimately a very simple point: making insults and attacks on people based on their race is either okay or it's not. These people have basically decided "it's okay for me to judge someone guilty because of their race because someone else of their race already did it". Which is literal racist prejudice. Claiming "well us pocs aren't as privileged as you so we're just not capable of hitting as hard when we do it, therefore you can take it" is an absurd position because you plainly want to close that gap and make sure pocs have as much political and social power as whites, so stop training them to think racism is okay for them!
They want to have their cake and eat it too. They don't want to water down the power of racism because then people won't be so scared of it, but they only want it to be used in one direction, so they have their own definition of it that they wheel out whenever they want to win an argument.
Racism is bad because it's a fundamentally illogical and unfair position to take, judging an individual on their basis on race alone, BUT that's exactly what they want to do with white people. To avoid being called hypocrites, they added the + Power dynamic, but only use that when required. Also note how this is never used on an individual basis, only ever applying to entire races. When they can't do that, they bring in historical contexts. For example.

Black guy hates white guy because he's white. Racist?
No, because white people have power.
But this is in an African country where the government, police and military are 100% black. Racist?
No, because the country used to be a British colony.
But that ended decades ago.
Doesn't matter.

They don't care about fairness. They're like children playing a game, with one kid inventing new rules on the fly just to prevent the other from getting too far ahead. Which, funnily, is what they say white people do to them.
 
They want to have their cake and eat it too. They don't want to water down the power of racism because then people won't be so scared of it, but they only want it to be used in one direction, so they have their own definition of it that they wheel out whenever they want to win an argument.
Racism is bad because it's a fundamentally illogical and unfair position to take, judging an individual on their basis on race alone, BUT that's exactly what they want to do with white people. To avoid being called hypocrites, they added the + Power dynamic, but only use that when required. Also note how this is never used on an individual basis, only ever applying to entire races. When they can't do that, they bring in historical contexts. For example.

Black guy hates white guy because he's white. Racist?
No, because white people have power.
But this is in an African country where the government, police and military are 100% black. Racist?
No, because the country used to be a British colony.
But that ended decades ago.
Doesn't matter.

They don't care about fairness. They're like children playing a game, with one kid inventing new rules on the fly just to prevent the other from getting too far ahead. Which, funnily, is what they say white people do to them.

That's the crux of their bullshit. If you hate racists, hate all racists equally. If are fine with it, than be fine with it all.

And that is before they just dissapear when two non-white ethnicites have a genocide party. Its only bad when whites kill blacks. Blacks killing whites is just and pure, and blacks killing blacks does not ever exist. If tribal african fighting got 10% of the press and charity attention than Jamal getting triggered by seeing a red hat and justly chimping out, blacks would have better conditions to live in.
 
They don't care about fairness. They're like children playing a game, with one kid inventing new rules on the fly just to prevent the other from getting too far ahead. Which, funnily, is what they say white people do to them.
Shit, that makes me think of a dumb game the boys in my grade school played*: we'd set up plastic army soldiers in the sandbox and then throw clumps of sand/dirt to knock out the other team's soldiers. Once two boys demanded to be able to gang up on me solo to be "fair". Their reasoning? They were both in 4th grade and I was in 5th grade. My reasoning that 4 arms beating 2 matters more fell on deaf ears. Even 9 year olds should know better than that, but certainly "adults" should.

That's what western progressivism is like. Which grade you're in is a sin you can't control but need to be punished for, despite that in practical terms you're still not advantaged by it - unless you deliberately hobble yourself so you fail and get held back to look like a victim, then you'd get rewarded for it in the game! - and all the extra hands throwing dirt your team has magically doesn't count, no matter how many schools/media outlets/government mandates are adding more hands to your team.

*bonus points because such a milquetoast game nowadays would doubtlessly get students expelled for violence or something.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo