Culture University racism study criticised for including anti-white harassment - Black Students’ officer at the National Union of Students: "‘anti-white prejudice’ should have no place in a report on racial harassment"

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...dy-criticised-including-anti-white-harassment

Prominent academics and student leaders have criticised the government’s equalities watchdog for including prejudice against white British students in its inquiry into racism in UK universities.

They accused the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) of drawing a false equivalence between what it described as racial harassment against white British students and staff and the racism suffered by their black and minority ethnic peers.

According to the watchdog’s student survey, 9% of white British students experienced racial harassment, compared with 29% of black students and 27% of Asian students.

The report, Tackling Racial Harassment: Universities Challenged, highlighted examples of anti-English sentiment at Scottish and Welsh universities.

A white English member of staff told the inquiry that two Welsh colleagues used a slur when referring to English people: “She was speaking in English and changed to Welsh for that word thinking I wouldn’t understand. I’ve never come across so much racism as when I moved to Wales.”

Heidi Mirza, a visiting professor of race, faith and culture at Goldsmiths, University of London, said the EHRC’s inclusion of anti-British sentiment watered down the impact of racism on people of colour.

“Anti-black, anti-Asian and Islamophobic and antisemitic racism is on a different scale to the anti-English sentiment,” she said. “The experience that the Scottish and the Welsh students might experience will not equate to what skin colour and visible difference means to students on campus.”


Fope Olaleye, the black students’ officer at the National Union of Students, said the EHRC had ignored pleas made at a roundtable event with the inquiry team earlier this year to exclude anti-white harassment from their report.

She tweeted: “I remember sitting at one of the round tables and a bunch of students and myself had to explain in excruciatingly detail that ‘anti-white prejudice’ should have no place in a report on racial harassment but I see we were not listened to.”

She later added: “There was a definite tension with the students in the room who were concerned by how they were defining racism in the report and many of us pressed and challenged it.”

Gargi Bhattacharyya, professor of sociology at the University of East London, said similar concerns had been raised with the EHRC by the University College Union’s black member’s standing committee.

She tweeted: “We had a similar awkward convo with them. And sent written notes to remind them of our concerns on this issue.”

An EHRC spokeswoman said its report made clear that racial harassment predominantly affects black and Asian students.

She added: “We received a small number of examples of anti-English sentiment at Scottish and Welsh universities, offensive comments about Gypsy and Irish Traveller students and examples of anti-Semitic slurs for both staff and students. To ignore these issues raised with us would have been wrong. Our recommendations are designed to ensure that universities can appropriately address and tackle racial harassment in all of its forms.”
 
*Obvious clown world joke*

But considering the diverse and conflicted groups of white people in the UK, its understandable why they should include it. and its not an insignificant number of people experiencing what would under any other category count as racially charged comments.

Good on the team for at least standing by their results.
 
According to the watchdog’s student survey, 9% of white British students experienced racial harassment, compared with 29% of black students and 27% of Asian students.
I love how percentages can make something small seem large and vice versa, also we all know "Asian" means kebab in this sense. Like sure 9% of White students could be targeted, but how many white students are there? That 29% and 27% could be from a few dozen students total while there could be several hundred honkeys on campus. So suddenly thats 90+ white students facing discrimination and 15-20 blacks and "Asians". Without a full census of the students these percentages are just dishonest.
 
Irish, Scottish, Welsh and English. That's a lot of people looking like a bottle of Elmers glue in one place. It's pretty dishonest about how these boards were telling them not to include anti-white racism. Is it because you wanted to study on exclusively minorities in your country? No? then why exclude it? Might as well have it considering there's 4 different backgrounds- dare I say "races"- of pale Homo sapiens in one tight location. It's not like America where we are all pretty much like that autistic kid who puts a bit of every fountain drink in their cup.

Maybe these people who put pressure on these guys had glue in their coffee mugs as well. Mistook the milk and creamer as racist for being white.

In the end, this is just some people upset that someone included some statistics that pastey looking people get harassed based on race as well. Accusing the EHRC of coming up with a false report just because anti-white racism is included really does make them look pretty stupid. Especially since their findings show anti-white racism is MUCH lower in their findings.
 
Fope Olaleye dijo:
I can't stand how these people get away with making their ideological frameworks based on semantics. This post basically translates to "You can be bigoted towards white people, but you can't be racist towards them", knowing damn well that no one is being called out for 'acting bigoted'. They have a monopoly on legitimate, mainstream discussion about racism, and it's all built on pedantry.
 
I can't stand how these people get away with making their ideological frameworks based on semantics. This post basically translates to "You can be bigoted towards white people, but you can't be racist towards them", knowing damn well that no one is being called out for 'acting bigoted'. They have a monopoly on legitimate, mainstream discussion about racism, and it's all built on pedantry.

"They are robots morty:"
 
They don't want anti-British harassment included because then it makes them look like hypocritical dickheads, which they are. As @Diabeetus said, they have a monopoly on mainstream discourse and they know how powerful that is and will not allow that to be threatened. I also like the implication that racism itself isn't bad, it's just black and brown people can't handle it while whites are supposed to have thicker skin. And welcome back to "institutional racism", that invisible force that cannot be named or located but, like gravity, has an affect on everything. Much like witchcraft, it gives those seeking to destroy it Carte Blanche to burn as many people and villages as they feel they need to.
 
They don't want anti-British harassment included because then it makes them look like hypocritical dickheads, which they are. As @Diabeetus said, they have a monopoly on mainstream discourse and they know how powerful that is and will not allow that to be threatened. I also like the implication that racism itself isn't bad, it's just black and brown people can't handle it while whites are supposed to have thicker skin. And welcome back to "institutional racism", that invisible force that cannot be named or located but, like gravity, has an affect on everything. Much like witchcraft, it gives those seeking to destroy it Carte Blanche to burn as many people and villages as they feel they need to.
institutional racism = i moved to a majority white country i have no business being in, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
 
institutional racism = i moved to a majority white country i have no business being in, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Or when it comes to hiring and college admissions practices, it's okay when the institutional racism is against the melanin deficient.
 
MSCl2hA.gif
 
Atrás
Top Abajo