Science U.N. Expert: Air Pollution Kills Somebody Every 5 Seconds


___
U.N. Expert: Air Pollution Kills Somebody Every 5 Seconds
Colman Andrews


Air pollution stings our eyes, burns our lungs, and turns our skies murky brown or yellow. It is also responsible for the early deaths of some 7 million people every year -- almost one every five seconds, according to David Boyd, an independent expert on human rights and the environment for the United Nations. Access to clean air isn’t just a nicety, he says; it’s a human right.

a person with smoke coming out of it
© Sean Gallup / Staff / Getty Images

In advance of World Environment Day on Wednesday -- its theme this year is air pollution -- Boyd issued a statement identifying an uncontaminated atmosphere as a core component of a healthy environment, and noted that “the right to a healthy environment is fundamental to human well-being.” The failure of governments globally to ensure clean air, said Boyd, is a “violation of the rights to life, health, and well-being, as well as the right to live in a healthy environment.”


Boyd repeated the advice he offered in a report presented to the U.N. Human Rights Council in March on ways to reduce air pollution: Countries should monitor air quality and its impacts on human health; assess sources of air pollution; establish air quality legislation; and develop air quality action plans.

“In celebration of World Environment Day,” Boyd said, “I urge states to take bold action to beat air pollution, improve health, address climate change, and fulfill their human rights obligations.”

Bad air quality isn’t solely an urban concern, an issue only in the world’s most polluted cities: An estimated 90% of the world’s population is estimated to breathe polluted air. One specific type of air pollution, commonly known as PM2.5 -- shorthand for particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers in diameter or smaller -- is especially harmful. The source of PM2.5 is typically combustion — fires, automobiles, or factories — and this type of air pollution has been linked to a number of health issues, including asthma, lung infections, heart attacks, and premature death. In the United States, these are the states with the most premature death.

More than half of the population is affected even in countries with a reputation for clean air. For example, 56.9% of people in Denmark are exposed to air pollution, and Denmark is considered to be among the countries doing the most to protect the environment.

So according to this U.N "Expert," one person dies every five second to air pollution. Lets do the math here. One person dies every five seconds. That means that at least 12 people die per minute. 720 people die per hour. 17,280 people die a day. And 6,324,480 people are killed every year. And according to U.N "Expert" David Boyd, "some 7 million people die each year."

I did the math, and that's not "some 7 million people." 7 million is 7 million, not 6.3 million. David "Expert" Boyd should have said "some 6 million people die a year," not 7 million. And according to this https://www.ecology.com/birth-death-rates/ website.


World Birth and Death Rates
Estimated 2011
Birth RateDeath Rate
• 19 births/1,000 population• 8 deaths/1,000 population
• 131.4 million births per year• 55.3 million people die each year
• 360,000 births per day• 151,600 people die each day
• 15,000 births each hour• 6,316 people die each hour
• 250 births each minute• 105 people die each minute
• Four births each second of every day• Nearly two people die each second
Average life expectancy at birth is approximately 67 years. Sources: Population Reference Bureau & The World Factbook (Central Intelligence Agency)


It states that an average 55.3 million people die each year. And against an average 131.4 million people we gain 76.1 million people a year. Which means that the world population increases. Is it sad that 6.3 million people die each year from air pollution? Yes. But the question that I am wondering is, What age group is affected the most by air pollution? Because the way I see it, if majority of deaths of air pollution are the elderly. Which those who are elderly is anyone 65 years old and older. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/

And according to the chart above the average life expectancy at birth is 67 years. Which is a huge increase from 100 years ago. As according to this chart. https://www.seniorliving.org/history/1900-2000-changes-life-expectancy-united-states/


��
At Birth​
At Age 65​
At Age 85​
At Birth​
At Age 65​
At Age 85​
White MenBlack Men
Additional Years​
28​
4​
2​
35​
5​
2​
Percentage Change​
60%​
33%​
50%​
106%​
50%​
50%​
1900​
47​
12​
4​
33​
10​
4​
1910​
49​
–​
4​
34​
–​
5​
1920​
54​
–​
4​
46​
–​
5​
1930​
60​
–​
4​
47​
–​
4​
1940​
62​
–​
4​
52​
–​
5​
1950​
67​
13​
4​
59​
13​
5​
1960​
67​
13​
4​
61​
13​
5​
1970​
68​
13​
5​
60​
13​
6​
1980​
71​
14​
5​
64​
13​
6​
1990​
73​
15​
5​
65​
13​
5​
2000​
75​
16​
6​
68​
15​
6​




As you can see the average life expectancy has increased tremendously since 100 years ago. Which has had a whopping 62% increase. And that is due to modern medicine, science, and the fact that we are, and I repeat are, using more cleaner energy fuels than 100 years ago.

So, is pollution killing people? Yes, but just as it had when we started to use fire. The only way to combat this so called "problem," is to use cleaner energy sources, such as Nuclear energy, allow medicine to be accessible to treat and cure diseases, allow medicine to be developed and created to further increase our ability to cure diseases, and don't overhype the problem to scare people into doing something dumb and stupid shit. Like the New Green Deal.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Hah, I wouldn't go so far as to say recycling and pollution controls are pointless, while you won't make a meaningful dent in CO2 emissions without their participation, reducing local energy consumption and emissions of dangerous real pollutants can make a meaningful difference.

The red herring of CO2 based climate change has been more damaging to the environment than any greed based regulations made by republicans. It's perfect for making people say "well it's hopeless anyway, why bother?"
 
"Don't you know more people die of air pollution than die of war in Vietnam?"
-Luanne Platter, UN Climate Expert

Jokes aside, I am not surprised that a lot of people die from air pollution.

I'm betting the majority of these deaths are in China too, since Beijing in 2019 makes Victorian London look like pure virgin rain forests when it comes to man-made air pollution.

The SJW's typically ignore the fact that China is the foremost in carbon emissions by far, and instead they simply blame America for killing the planet because we didn't adapt automated luxury gay space communism and didn't sign two meaningless and empty treaties, both of which explicitly gave China a pass on any regulations that could hinder their booming economy.

Also, Bill Clinton was the one who refused to sign the Kyoto Accords, not Bush.

In fact, Clinton's main reason for rejecting the accords was precisely due to China's special exemptions. Also, the idea of man-made climate change was not considered a mainstream idea in the 1990's.

Part of the reason why Al Gore became so fixated on climate change (and was the one who helped make it a mainstream talking point) was due to how badly the Kyoto Accords were handled by all parties involved (the other part was to gain money and attention)

The only people who took the issue seriously before the mid-2000's were either scientists that nobody listened to or conspiracy theorists, most notably Coast To Coast AM.

Art Bell frequently discussed the idea as did George Noory, and Noory even criticized the commercialization of a very real issue in the wake of Al Gore.

I believe in man-made climate change but the Left co-opting fears and concerns of a legitimate issue to push their own unrelated social agendas is just sickening and even more harmful to the environment in the long term.

Most of the people who harp on Climate Change the most are also against nuclear energy, which is the one carbon-negative form of power that is actually efficient and practical.

Instead they're blaming capitalism, ignoring China's role in this disaster, and chasing the hippie pipe dream of solar energy (PROTIP: Solar cannot support the electricity needs of the United States alone, and neither can wind)
 

___
U.N. Expert: Air Pollution Kills Somebody Every 5 Seconds
Colman Andrews


Air pollution stings our eyes, burns our lungs, and turns our skies murky brown or yellow. It is also responsible for the early deaths of some 7 million people every year -- almost one every five seconds, according to David Boyd, an independent expert on human rights and the environment for the United Nations. Access to clean air isn’t just a nicety, he says; it’s a human right.

a person with smoke coming out of it
© Sean Gallup / Staff / Getty Images

In advance of World Environment Day on Wednesday -- its theme this year is air pollution -- Boyd issued a statement identifying an uncontaminated atmosphere as a core component of a healthy environment, and noted that “the right to a healthy environment is fundamental to human well-being.” The failure of governments globally to ensure clean air, said Boyd, is a “violation of the rights to life, health, and well-being, as well as the right to live in a healthy environment.”


Boyd repeated the advice he offered in a report presented to the U.N. Human Rights Council in March on ways to reduce air pollution: Countries should monitor air quality and its impacts on human health; assess sources of air pollution; establish air quality legislation; and develop air quality action plans.

“In celebration of World Environment Day,” Boyd said, “I urge states to take bold action to beat air pollution, improve health, address climate change, and fulfill their human rights obligations.”

Bad air quality isn’t solely an urban concern, an issue only in the world’s most polluted cities: An estimated 90% of the world’s population is estimated to breathe polluted air. One specific type of air pollution, commonly known as PM2.5 -- shorthand for particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers in diameter or smaller -- is especially harmful. The source of PM2.5 is typically combustion — fires, automobiles, or factories — and this type of air pollution has been linked to a number of health issues, including asthma, lung infections, heart attacks, and premature death. In the United States, these are the states with the most premature death.

More than half of the population is affected even in countries with a reputation for clean air. For example, 56.9% of people in Denmark are exposed to air pollution, and Denmark is considered to be among the countries doing the most to protect the environment.

So according to this U.N "Expert," one person dies every five second to air pollution. Lets do the math here. One person dies every five seconds. That means that at least 12 people die per minute. 720 people die per hour. 17,280 people die a day. And 6,324,480 people are killed every year. And according to U.N "Expert" David Boyd, "some 7 million people die each year."

I did the math, and that's not "some 7 million people." 7 million is 7 million, not 6.3 million. David "Expert" Boyd should have said "some 6 million people die a year," not 7 million. And according to this https://www.ecology.com/birth-death-rates/ website.


World Birth and Death Rates
Estimated 2011
Birth RateDeath Rate
• 19 births/1,000 population• 8 deaths/1,000 population
• 131.4 million births per year• 55.3 million people die each year
• 360,000 births per day• 151,600 people die each day
• 15,000 births each hour• 6,316 people die each hour
• 250 births each minute• 105 people die each minute
• Four births each second of every day• Nearly two people die each second
Average life expectancy at birth is approximately 67 years. Sources: Population Reference Bureau & The World Factbook (Central Intelligence Agency)


It states that an average 55.3 million people die each year. And against an average 131.4 million people we gain 76.1 million people a year. Which means that the world population increases. Is it sad that 6.3 million people die each year from air pollution? Yes. But the question that I am wondering is, What age group is affected the most by air pollution? Because the way I see it, if majority of deaths of air pollution are the elderly. Which those who are elderly is anyone 65 years old and older. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/

And according to the chart above the average life expectancy at birth is 67 years. Which is a huge increase from 100 years ago. As according to this chart. https://www.seniorliving.org/history/1900-2000-changes-life-expectancy-united-states/


��
White MenBlack Men
At Birth​
At Age 65​
At Age 85​
At Birth​
At Age 65​
At Age 85​
Additional Years​
28​
4​
2​
35​
5​
2​
Percentage Change​
60%​
33%​
50%​
106%​
50%​
50%​
1900​
47​
12​
4​
33​
10​
4​
1910​
49​
–​
4​
34​
–​
5​
1920​
54​
–​
4​
46​
–​
5​
1930​
60​
–​
4​
47​
–​
4​
1940​
62​
–​
4​
52​
–​
5​
1950​
67​
13​
4​
59​
13​
5​
1960​
67​
13​
4​
61​
13​
5​
1970​
68​
13​
5​
60​
13​
6​
1980​
71​
14​
5​
64​
13​
6​
1990​
73​
15​
5​
65​
13​
5​
2000​
75​
16​
6​
68​
15​
6​




As you can see the average life expectancy has increased tremendously since 100 years ago. Which has had a whopping 62% increase. And that is due to modern medicine, science, and the fact that we are, and I repeat are, using more cleaner energy fuels than 100 years ago.

So, is pollution killing people? Yes, but just as it had when we started to use fire. The only way to combat this so called "problem," is to use cleaner energy sources, such as Nuclear energy, allow medicine to be accessible to treat and cure diseases, allow medicine to be developed and created to further increase our ability to cure diseases, and don't overhype the problem to scare people into doing something dumb and stupid shit. Like the New Green Deal.

That Graph is utterly retarded and makes no sense.
 
China won't stop massive usage of CFCs they banned years ago, and using them in industries that just dump them into the atmosphere. "hey, the ozone layer isn't healing like it should - oh, wait, China is lying again."

China says they fix things, and then the rest of the world detects plumes of all things bad coming from there. Lather, rinse, repeat.
 
It's called the Tragedy of the Commons, and the official Game Theory response is to get while the gettin's good and then brace for the inevitable.
 
WE KNOW THAT, THATS WHY OUR CITYS DONT LOOK LIKE CHINESE CITYS! fuckn idiots at the UN eating my tax money---
 
I'm basically waiting for 2100, since by then the oil will have run out and all the stupid fucks who waffled about this will be responsible for the economic collapse of the Western world. I'm for nuclear power because oil will last us two generations more, maybe three if we're lucky at our current rate, and after a while, we'll have none left.

Then, unless we go full sperg with coal (which will deplete it faster), or had alternatives already, we're fucked.
 
I'm basically waiting for 2100, since by then the oil will have run out and all the stupid fucks who waffled about this will be responsible for the economic collapse of the Western world. I'm for nuclear power because oil will last us two generations more, maybe three if we're lucky at our current rate, and after a while, we'll have none left.

Then, unless we go full sperg with coal (which will deplete it faster), or had alternatives already, we're fucked.
We're not going to just "run out" of oil one day. It'll get more and more expensive and alternatives will naturally become more popular due to basic economics.

Also, we can synthesize it, so there is an upper limit on price. But from what I understand, synthesizing it makes it way more expensive and makes a lot of competing energy sources more attractive.

I like nuclear too, although I doubt we're ever going to see nuclear powered cars or anything, so we will still need other portable methods of powering things. Batteries have the same problem of dirty, limited resources.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo