Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

[prollyanotherlurker]

I don’t want to be a dick either, it’s just you called me retarded so I chimped out.

bro

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

technically if Trump were to say, be someones vice president, then that person happened to be "taken out". Trump could have a third term without needed to challenge the constitution.

Or more likely if he was going to get a third term, they would bring it to the supreme court, and let the cards fall where they may (if he ran again I mean).

Either way. lets just home Bannon is a retard who made shit up, and we can be done with this nigger at the end of this term.

That doesn't mean that fatty isn't going to try, though. And we know that Republicans and SC won't try and stop him because they're spineless cucks

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Oh he'd try. A blood clot might have something to say about it though.

I strongly doubt Trump will make it to 2028. He's had four "annual physicals" this year already. Where do you think his bizarre obsession with his legacy comes from? Why is he looting the government while enriching his family? He's dying and he knows it.

I hope it’s painful and it kills him before the election and the Republican Party is decapitated.* I’d rather lose a few elections and have a better party come back than keep having this shit happen.

It really would have been better for the country if he had bought it at Butler. I’ve mentioned my dream before. I do think the Mandate of Heaven is a useful framework outside of China. I think God/Providence looked down on the country, decided it was wanting and tipped the scale that we’d have a downward spiral. You’ve serve your purpose, Old Yeller.

I'm a man out of my own time. I feel more in common with the old scientific revolution/Enlightenment philosophers and mystics and Indian chiefs. I believe in social science and omens and divine wrath. Just that God hangs us with the rope we give him. I think one way that conservatism - the religious kind - in this country went far astray was it assumed a special relationship with God that never existed. Americans liked to think of themselves as a sort of covenant people - that's a thing, Calvinist covenant theology - and then this got a deist baptism in the Revolution and we've had it ever since. But over the years what's been forgotten is that this is something that's only ever existed in our minds as an aspiration, and you can - if you take this sort of thing seriously - lose it. You'll hear the Right thunder about poopdick, trannies, liberal Christianity, all that sort of thing, with US flags all over these churches, but there is still this deeply presumptuous assumption that we are somehow still God's most favored country, that our particular cultural traits and systems are favored, that we will continue to enjoy it, and what you never see is any serious self-criticism or grappling with the idea that this relationship is already dead. I don't think I have ever heard of a conservative church that considered that while God hates warmongering and poopdick alike, he might hate warmongering more, for example. You hear the conservative churches talk about the US like it is already blessed while railing about abortion and there never seems to be any consideration that God might find the scale of abortion in this society, and the way we feel about it, so appalling that this IS Babylon. Bible doesn't like empires, as a rule, but our empire is somehow supposed to be good. You hear calls to arms about how the country needs to win itself back, but you don't hear Jeremiads about how if we don't right course soon that we may be cast aside for good as a society and be destroyed.

I do believe in this stuff. I just, like I said, think it plays out through providence, not the supernatural.


*I should clarify, I mean as in "has no leadership, so it falls apart and has to reform."

 

[Retrodogkiller]

I'm not saying he would try to take this route. But if theoretically he did work out a plan like this. He could take whatever role would be easiest for him to fill. Provided the people in the chain above him were in on it. It is a bit far fetched. I'm just thinking about how it would have to work if he were to do it.

A former president who served two terms cannot be put into those positions. Not that its impossible at this point.

Or more likely if he was going to get a third term, they would bring it to the supreme court, and let the cards fall where they may (if he ran again I mean).

This is more his style. And the current court has shown to be cucks so they'll let it happen.

 

[General Patton]

Ver archivo adjunto 9179882
Lawgiver unironically.


He said it. His followers said and wanted it. They already printed the merch. Where would ANYONE get the idea it's possible?! /suhneed

It explains him sucking up to North Korea. Kind of weird to try to be allies with a known dictator.

 

[somevan]

I won't even be sarcastic about the US-Iran MoU at this point. The US is on its back foot and Iran is gaining more leverage.

Link / Archive

The structure of the newly established “deconfliction cell” to oversee the ceasefire in Lebanon appears to constrain Israeli action against Hezbollah by eliminating the post-2024 ceasefire monitoring mechanism, which allowed Israel to act against Hezbollah ceasefire violations in certain circumstances. Both Iran and Hezbollah could materially benefit from a constrained Israeli ability to confront Hezbollah.

Israeli media reported that the newly agreed-upon mechanism between the United States, Iran, Qatar, and Pakistan is designed to replace the former ceasefire monitoring committee. It is unclear how the newly established deconfliction cell will function.

Israel used to be able to retaliate against Hezbollah even during ceasefires (under certain circumstances that I don't know). That may no longer be the case, much to Iran and Hezbollah's advantage. It is one step closer towards the MoU being implemented, however.

Iran has secured economic relief through a US Treasury Department sanctions waiver for Iranian oil and petrochemical exports and a reported Iran-Qatar memorandum of understanding that facilitates the unfreezing of Iranian assets.

The US Treasury Department issued a waiver on June 22 for Iranian crude oil and petrochemical exports through August 21. The waiver includes associated services such as banking transactions, insurance, and transportation. The waiver does not apply to Iranian exports to North Korea, Cuba, and Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine.[16] The United States had already committed to the sanctions waiver as part of the US-Iran MoU that the United States and Iran signed on June 17.[17] Iranian media separately reported that Iran and Qatar signed a separate MoU for Qatar to unfreeze Iranian assets.[18] Qatar has not acknowledged this claim as of this writing.

Iran will be receiving oil revenues in the near future. Iranian media previously reported figures in the billions for potential oil revenue over the 60 days post-MoU signing.

US Vice President JD Vance told reporters on June 22 that Iran would use unfrozen funds to purchase US agricultural products if the United States unfroze the funds.[19] Iranian media subsequently denied Vance’s comments, however.[20]

Vance is trying to convince MIGA this is somehow a US win lmao

Iran does not appear to have made any nuclear concessions in the June 21 talks in Switzerland. An Iranian official reiterated that the United States must fulfill other MoU clauses, such as the ceasefire on all fronts and economic relief clauses, in order to “pave the way for the implementation of mutual obligations.” The official’s comments are consistent with how Iran is attempting to condition nuclear talks on economic relief and the United States compelling Israel to end operations and withdraw from Lebanon.

As expected, Iran is using the MoU to its advantage and not immediately making nuclear concessions. There really shouldn't be any surprise.

The US and Iranian delegations agreed on June 21 to establish a line of communication to prevent military incidents in the Strait of Hormuz as commercial vessels transit through the strait. IRGC-affiliated media claimed on June 21 that this line of communication — which appears to be designed mainly to avoid maritime incidents or miscommunication — establishes Iran’s sovereignty over the strait.

I would like to emphasize the US's screw-up with the MoU regarding reopening the Strait of Hormuz. From the MoU:

"Immediately upon the signing of this MoU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal."
The paragraph above states that the traffic count must match pre-war levels and that the US will remove its blockade and military forces.

"Upon the signing of this MoU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz."
This paragraph states that Iran will not charge commercial traffic for 60 days after signing, will remove obstacles, and that Iran will coordinate with Oman to define how the Strait will be administered.

Nothing in any of the paragraphs states that Iran will have to relinquish its illegal control over the Strait and refrain from claiming ownership or sovereignty. This has allowed Iran to continue to claim ownership and control over the Strait, and will allow Iran to continue to make those claims, and there's nothing the US can do about it. The ISW already admitted that this clause eroded the longstanding freedom of navigation of the seas.
Link / Archive

The fact that Iran can negotiate the status of an international waterway is nonetheless an erosion of long-established international law and norms enshrined in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

 

[General Patton]

And you think that'll stop him from trying?

Someone hasn't noticed all the "Trump 2028" merch and hollarings.

J6 proves that there are tons of Americans that will fall for and allow this to happen because they all want to "own the libs" and make them mad so they can laugh about TDS.

If you want proof, look at all the retardation where they accuse people of TDS, even though a lot of it is genuine criticism of Trump's fuckups.

 

[MazonLabs Recruitment Rep]

J6 proves that there are tons of Americans that will fall for and allow this to happen because they all want to "own the libs" and make them mad so they can laugh about TDS.

If you want proof, look at all the retardation where they accuse people of TDS, even though a lot of it is genuine criticism of Trump's fuckups.

Again, they're just using an old USSR play that Stalin loved; only the mentally ill would dare oppose The Revolution.

 

[Nonga Tork]

Unfortunately this is to my eyes one of two severe character defects in what I otherwise consider a good culture. It goes much deeper and longer than just today. An Americans word has always been completely worthless, not just with Indians but also with allies, even White countries. I’d say Americans are this way because of a mixture of democracy (not the only democracy, but the one that internalized it as a culture the most) making them hate not having freedom to act on their will all the time and isolation allowing us to chimp out without getting coalitions going. I’ve viewed it this way for some time, came up among other things when Trump sold the Kurds out. You never want to be in the position of relying on Americans.

I'd say it's a combination of inherited cultural factors (Britain got nicknamed Perfidious Albion for a reason) and that to an even greater extent than Britain America's geographical position has meant that it was immune to most consequences for breaking treaties and not keeping one's word. Definitely even compared to other democracies, American presidents have felt free to disregard previous administration's international promises and this has been a thing almost since the beginning of the country.

 

[General Patton]

Again, they're just using an old USSR play that Stalin loved; only the mentally ill would dare oppose The Revolution.

So, according to these fucktards:

Criticism of Obama: acceptable
Criticism of Biden: acceptable
Criticism of Trump: unacceptable

Last time I checked it's our right as Americans to criticize a president. Pretty ironic that they call leftists communists while acting like a communist country.

 

[Dr.0]

So, according to these fucktards:

Criticism of Obama: acceptable
Criticism of Biden: acceptable
Criticism of Trump: unacceptable

Last time I checked it's our right as Americans to criticize a president. Pretty ironic that they call leftists communists while acting like a communist country.

" It's not communism when WE do it, libtard"- maga