Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I guess what some people here are saying is that the DNC know Biden is gonna fucking die. That way they can fill the VP candidate slot with some strong, stunning queen (or kween) and go "oops he ded b4 election day guess its her turn!"
The issue is that doesn't make sense. His condition makes him unelectable, if they were going to do this they'd make sure the person in the President slot is electable so that their VP will win with them. Then probably make sure the president falls down a flight of stairs.
 
The issue is that doesn't make sense. His condition makes him unelectable, if they were going to do this they'd make sure the person in the President slot is electable so that their VP will win with them. Then probably make sure the president falls down a flight of stairs.
True, but I can see where they're coming from. The media thinks they're the priestly caste of the DNC and they'd presumably go full Weekend at Bernie's Third Beachhouse to destroy the orange cheeto demon
 
Tinfoil hat with one layer: The DNC is fully aware of Biden's degenerating mental state, and is going forward with him steadily losing it in public to garner sympathy votes when they pull the planned VP candidate switcharoo.

Tinfoil hat with extra layers and it's all scrunchy and has a stupid shape up at the top: The DNC is actually causing Biden's degenerating mental state on a schedule with timed injections of something so that they can pull this off according to their timetable, and instead of withdrawing because of the dementia he'll drop dead sometime in early October.
The only difference between your theory and my theory is that I think it's all an act on Biden's part.
 
Just assume that no matter what is logical or make sense...

Everyone will do the dumbest, most pants on head retarded, absolutely nonsensical, completely batshit insane thing while everyone around either stares in shock, laughs in horror, or enthusiastically claps their flipper-hands together and makes horking noises before writing articles about how it's a good thing.

"If it reads like it should be an Onion or Babylon Bee or Duffleblog article, it's probably real or going to happen."
 
To be completely serious, if it is a prion disease (Which would most likely be CJD) then Biden is Royally Buttfucked, shit is aggressive, unforgiving and kills in a year.

I would also become convinced God is real and hates the democrats because that would be some of the most unfortunate luck in the entire world. Seriously, that's a literal one out of a million chance. Meaning I'm also gonna assume it's not a prion, though I will start looking at his hands to see if they're starting to shake.
 
His condition makes him unelectable,
download.jpeg


The problem is that the DNC may not recognize that fact. They seem to bank on the mainstream media covering for them, and mostly they've been right about that. If they have really learned anything from 2016, they won't push that too hard, but if they can't find a candidate they are confident will beat Trump, they may resort to propping up this one. I hope not.

The next few months will be interesting.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 1037081

The problem is that the DNC may not recognize that fact. They seem to bank on the mainstream media covering for them, and mostly they've been right about that. If they have really learned anything from 2016, they won't push that too hard, but if they can't find a candidate they are confident will beat Trump, they may resort to propping up this one. I hope not.

The next few months will be interesting.
They have clinton. While unwell, as 2016 proves, she at least isn't actively degrading before our eyes.
 
Just a casual reminder, while Pelosi and Schiff are running a clown show in the house and the democratic primaries are the lamest knockoff of survivor yet, the Senate is busying playing Go with our judical branch:
Screenshot_20191204-223032_Chrome.jpg


I think it's hilarious while the right side of history is convinced that... whatever they're doing, is finally the silver bullet they've been looking for, the Republicans are gradually taking over the third branch of government, and no one notices because it's not as exciting as the world's most exceptional game of telephone ever.

(Semi-off topic: what's the best website to archive tweets? The ones I tried all had trouble. Maybe it's that I'm a 30 year old boomer who can't do tech, but I think it's the prog-cult preemptively making memory holing easier.)
 
Was writing a post about thinking if the DNC/RNC has been keeping old folks in office long past their time to keep hold of their power and that it should be declared elder abuse, but I wasn't thrilled with how I was organizing my thoughts. I still do wonder how much of it is by personal choice or by string-pulling behind the curtain. Still is really worrisome that there's a lot of ill-informed/lazy voters keeping in the same fogies over and over again just because of name-recognition alone/having that "R" or "D" next to their names.

(Semi-off topic: what's the best website to archive tweets? The ones I tried all had trouble. Maybe it's that I'm a 30 year old boomer who can't do tech, but I think it's the prog-cult preemptively making memory holing easier.)

Luckily for you, someone already archived it hours ago. But I don't think it's just you, the archive sites have all been acting up for a while now.
 
I still think the DNC is going to run Biden since they have no other choice at this point, and of all the viable candidates, he's the one who will do the least amount of damage to the Democratic Party if he loses to Trump.

I do think whomever Biden picks as his VP is probably going to be a backup plan, although I think the backup plan itself will be very different than what a lot of people here are thinking.

Call it a hunch, but I think the DNC has largely written off 2020 and are trying to make plans for both 2024 and the 2022 Midterms. They'll take the win if they can get it and they'll still have the media pull every trick in the book in the hopes that it could still work, but Biden is a safe candidate for two reasons.

If he loses to Trump, they can write that off as him being an old out-of-touch white male establishment guy which can pacify The Squad and your more explicitly left-wing elements of the party's base and since Biden's on his last legs as it is, they can easily dismiss him making a run in 2024 and focus on younger candidates like Buttigieg or give folks like Warren a proper shot.

If Warren loses to Trump, the DNC will have to at least internally admit that America has largely rejected the Woke Left and that will infuriate The Squad and their ilk, and it will no doubt divide the party from within to an even more harsh degree. If Trump manages to win the popular vote alongside the electoral one, then they won't be able to really spin it and any attempt to do so will only infuriate everyone on all sides.

If Biden wins, then they can get their real pick (Biden's VP) into control, either directly via a health-related reason or as a "power behind the throne" figure until Biden finally dies or becomes too unhealthy to effectively govern and retires. This is a highly unlikely scenario, but it also covers the DNC's goals in the off-chance that they win.

Biden is their only real shot and they'll do everything they can to keep him alive and at least semi-functional until the day of the election.

If he loses, they can take that hit and they'll still be able to do everything they can to get a real Blue Wave going in 2022 and then win in 2024. If he wins, they can get their backup candidate in office right away instead of waiting to run them in 2024.
 
What does it matter who the DNC selects? Most Democrats would vote for a mannequin with a smiley-faced paper bag over its head if it promised them free gibs...
You'd think, but blacks just won't vote for a white person in the General and the only strategy the Democrats have is demographic replacement. If nonwhites don't turn out, they lose.
 
If he loses to Trump, they can write that off as him being an old out-of-touch white male establishment guy which can pacify The Squad and your more explicitly left-wing elements of the party's base and since Biden's on his last legs as it is, they can easily dismiss him making a run in 2024 and focus on younger candidates like Buttigieg or give folks like Warren a proper shot.

Imagine throwing a presidential election to reinforce your failing ideology.
 
The DNC is not in charge of who runs

Counterpoint: Hilary in 2016 & Superdelegates.


Most Brits found slavery abhorrent. Only major textile cities like Manchester were pro-confederacy.

I'll start out with this, and repeat after me:
The Civil War was not about Slavery. It was about states rights.
The state right that was being disputed was Slavery, but that's not what the war was about.

Lincoln didn't make it about Slavery until around the time of Emancipation Proclamation, when it had become clear they needed something stronger to fight about beyond "Keeping the union together".

The British had started the Anti-slavery squadrons because it aligned with their foreign objectives. The Morality of it was an excuse. Its estimate that 11 million people entered the slave markets of the Americas; only 300,000 entered the North American slave market. The rest went to Plantations in Brazil, Carribean, and Gran Columbia (Columbia, Panama, And Venezuela) - at the time Portuguese and Spanish (and spanish-aligned post independence) colonies (the Spics).

The British Colonies/the US imported so few because, putting it bluntly, they put a breeding program in place to home-grown the population. In Brazil especially, slaves were treated as expendable. The British anti-slavery efforts didn't affect the Confederacy much to at all.

Spain was the last European power to traffic in african slaves, and by disrupting that highly profitable enterprise, Britain was making sure Spain was weakened.

now, on to the Darkies & Dune coons.
At the time, the British were backing regiemes that ran partly or wholly on slavery, but they had moved away from the practice for two reasons:
1) Britain didn't directly benefit from slave labor. They had the Irish to abuse & exploit.
2) It gave them a "moral imperitive" to invade places where slavery existed (literally everywhere but Europe).

So fighting slavery gave the British an excuse to be fucking around in north-west africa. It also gave the a reason to push their sphere of influence in East Africa, and start putting pressure on the Ottomans, the sick man of Europe.
But the British were very tolerant of worker abuse in their empire AS LONG AS YOU DIDN'T CALL IT SLAVERY.

If given a strong enough incentive, the British media would have spun it to justify intervention.

I guess what I'm trying to say is it wasn't the foregone conclusion people make it out to be, but that's enough CW sperg for now we can be talking about the DNC fix being in Slow Joe.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo