Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Benedict Arnold escaped to England

Not a single person who was a member of the CSA government or military was imprisoned or executed just for that during Reconstruction. Not Jefferson Davis, not Robert E Lee, no one.

Once again, SJWs fail history

One of the more famous people executed for war crimes committed during the Civil War was Henry Wirz, who was blamed for the atrocities at the Andersonville prison camp, which could quite accurately have been called a concentration camp. Many other prosecutions were also for mistreatment or outright murder of prisoners. (There are a number of reasons to believe Wirz wasn't as personally guilty of what happened as he was deprived of adequate resources to keep prisoners alive.)
 
The South couldn't feed their own soldiers, let alone POWs, Wirz just got caught without a chair when the music stopped.

But the point is, they only executed you for war crimes, not for being part of an opposing rebel army that lost.
 
One of the top threads from r/politics at present
Ollu7tH.png

This is "2scoops2many" all over again
I keep getting called an alt-righter for pointing out that this is no different from the way breitbart and co acted about Obama - Michelle is a lush! He's taking too many vacations!
 
When you rake him over the coals for ordering too much ice cream, people tend to not believe you when you question actual policy, let alone misconduct. Crying Wolf isn't just some analogy that got made up out of nowhere...... there's a reason it happens.

I've been saying this since he won, the Media is going to bitch about so many pointless issues that when/if he actually does something actually illegal no one is going to give a shit. And this is before we get into the fact that they have literally proved right ever conservative commentator who claimed the mainstream media has a left-wing bias.
 
Not to mention most minorities are concentrated in already blue states so it's not really making much of a difference. The only state that Hispanics can really affect the election is Florida and Cubans vote Republican.

The Rust Belt is full of Puerto Ricans. They work hard at their jobs (or did, until NAFTA screwed them like everyone else), and get very irritated when white savior liberal types suggest that Trump wants to "deport" them, since the island is a U.S. territory. Informal polling of extended family shows they were split about 50/50.
 
The problem with this dumb inevitability argument is assuming you keep all these votes when the demographics shift. Trump got more Hispanic and black votes as a percentage than Romney, and Hillary got less votes in every demographic than Obama. Look at Hispanics. It's dumb to assume the Hispanics who actually show up to vote and have jobs actually give a shit about your dumb identity politics bullshit. They might even be completely turned off with that shit and don't particularly hate the Evil Whitey Demons.


We have a saying in Arizona. No one hates illegal immigrants more than a Mexican with a job

And brother, our Mexicans hustle
 
The problem with this dumb inevitability argument is assuming you keep all these votes when the demographics shift. Trump got more Hispanic and black votes as a percentage than Romney, and Hillary got less votes in every demographic than Obama. Look at Hispanics. It's dumb to assume the Hispanics who actually show up to vote and have jobs actually give a shit about your dumb identity politics bullshit. They might even be completely turned off with that shit and don't particularly hate the Evil Whitey Demons.

Especially Mexicans. Religious working class family oriented people, literally the only issue keeping them from voting Red across the board is immigration and Rep race baiting.
 
"Will Clinton run against Trunp in 2020?" Bitch will be lucky to still be alive in 2020. :lol:
I'm still hoping against all hope that Biden runs. He's had enough hilariosly tragic shit happen to him that I doubt he's all that scummy.
Honestly, Colin Powell should run, even if he was a Bush worker.
He's who Clinton got the private server horseshit from.
 
Última edición:
Rep race baiting

All top Democrat contenders were old white men and women

When it comes to Republicans, in the top 10 you had two latinos, one african-american, a woman and an indian. There's no such thing as Republican race-baiting, this is only a fake news meme that needs to die

While we're at it, you also have tons more ideological diversity on the Republican side than the Democratic one. Literally the only thing they argued about during the DNC debates were

'I'm more pro-BLM than you' 'No, I AM'
and
'The NRA hates me more than you do' 'No clearly I'm the NRA's number one enemy'

When it comes to Republicans you had the nationalist populist agenda of Trump but you had staunch conservatives like Ted Cruz, Libertarians like Rand Paul, more classical conservatives like Rubio and Fiorina, centrist cucks like Cucksichs, etc...



If the Left has any hopes of winning elections again they need to stop clinging so hard to orthodoxy while pretending its everyone else that is close minded. To wit:

 
The Rust Belt is full of Puerto Ricans. They work hard at their jobs (or did, until NAFTA screwed them like everyone else), and get very irritated when white savior liberal types suggest that Trump wants to "deport" them, since the island is a U.S. territory. Informal polling of extended family shows they were split about 50/50.

Puerto Rico is actually going to hold another referendum on their status in less then two weeks. They have the "stay the same/become independent/become a state" options that they had last time, but at first they wanted to exclude the stay a "stay the same" option, so that might be an indication that statehood isn't such a far off possibility considering that statehood won by a big majority four years ago (but wasn't binding). It'd be pretty interesting to see how both parties would react to them deciding to join the union.

On another note, I've noticed recently that in online places where leftists tend to congregate (r/politics, Neogaf, news sites comment sections and the like) that when the issue of polls and their accuracy are brought up there's a startlingly large number of people who respond with something like "RRRREEEEEEEEEE the polls were only off by 2%, fuck off troll/shill/brigader/trumpkin/fascist !!!!!".

You'd think that with all the time they spent bitching about the Electoral Collage they wouldn't forget about it so soon. They seem to be under the impression that political annalists were basing their projections on who was likely to win the popular vote rather than polling each state individually, and those polls were very off. Hell, there were some people who thought that Trump was actually going to win the popular vote but that he'd still be crushed in the EC.

I know its way to early to make predictions, but if so many people are under the impression that there were no problems with the polling last year then I'm much more confident that we're going to see massive chimp-outs during the mid terms when Democrats loose seats that they were "supposed" to win.
 
Última edición:
I had one person post on my FB page a poll that concluded Trump was going to turn in the worst performance since Walter Mondale, losing both popular and EC votes in a landslide.

I wish I could remember who it was sourced from so I could direct them to explain it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo