- Registrado
- 21 de Feb, 2018
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Iniciador del tema Randall Fragg
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Cable 7
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 20 de Mar, 2015
Doing some digging on this "Scientific Realm" dude, I can say with upmost certainty that it's ran by Benjamin Chams-El-Dine. He's been on twitter for ages under multiple account names shilling his old failed websites. He ended up leaving a papertrail with his "domainology" venture, as his registration info for that and another site is freely available.
Thank you for being such a wonderful foreign agitator Ben! Hope your next venture goes as well as this one does!
- Registrado
- 12 de Ene, 2019
That name echoes very loudly.
- Registrado
- 27 de Feb, 2015
Rolls right off the tongue...
- Registrado
- 13 de Feb, 2017
They hire them because their is zero risk of any consequences, they can pay the illegals less than Americans would want, and they can violate all sorts of other labor laws. Because what are the illegals going to do, turn them in?
As for hospitals billing the illegals? Don't be retarded. Illegals don't give their real names, their real addresses, and often just walk out after receiving treatment. How are the hospitals going to bill them? And what actually makes the illegals pay? Nothing. And they don't. The hospitals end up eating the costs of the deadbeats. Hospitals are required by law to provide treatment to every fresh-over-the-Rio peasant without a job or documents or even a lick of english who can manage to stagger up to a hospital's front door.
The sad reality of our healthcare system is this: It would be extremely cheap and amazingly effective if illegals were taken out of the equation. No system on earth can handle the number of free riders that illegals represent.
- Registrado
- 10 de Ago, 2019
This is sure to get some traction:
SEE! HE DOESN'T PLAN ON LEAVING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SEE! HE DOESN'T PLAN ON LEAVING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Registrado
- 19 de Ene, 2020
See, here's the thing-- that doesn't help anything. It might feel like it helps on an individual level, but all you're doing is obfuscating the costs and passing them on to Big Pharma's partner-in-crime, the insurance industry.
Do you recall what happened when the ACA passed? At first it seemed pretty nice, that 20 million uninsured Americans were now getting insurance. It was shit insurance, sure (the Bronze plan still holds you for $12,500 out of pocket, so if you're making little enough money that the vouchers cover it, you're still fucked), but almost instantly everybody's insurance began to rise. Within a few years people were expected to pay double or even triple what they had paid before the passing of the ACA. For covering families, it could cost more than your monthly mortgage just to have an insurance plan that, god willing, the vast majority of people never actually use over the course of a regular year.
Businesses with a certain number of full-time employees were forced to pay skyrocketing health insurance for all of them, which threatened to bankrupt swathes of small businesses. The workaround for this was to either fire people (since they could no longer be sustained) or cut hours (which meant they were no longer 'full time' and therefore did not qualify for government-mandated private-business-paid health insurance). People lost jobs and lost hours in the wake of businesses just trying to keep their heads above the water. Larger businesses could, of course, eat the cost (and larger businesses typically already provided health insurance, although many of those health insurance policies had to be expanded because of the demands of the ACA, such as every female employee having to pay for maternity insurance... even if they were too old to have children, infertile, or just plain weren't interested. That's what you get for having a uterus!), but small businesses (and their employees) couldn't handle it.
As prices continued to soar, suddenly it cost five- or six-hundred dollars just to cover two people under one plan. You wanted to cover a family? Expect to pay four digits a month. And these were costs for the Bronze-level ACA package which-- which, because you're looking at covering multiple people, now holds you accountable for $24,000 out-of-pocket. If you wanted to adhere to the government mandate, you were going to be losing huge chunks of your income every month for the privilege of still paying five figures in the event that the worst happened.
For those twenty million people who were now insured, thirty million others lost theirs. Those who already had it were forced to cut back on all other expenses just to cover the costs-- it wasn't hard to find a story about somebody who had to decide whether health insurance or food was more important. And if you didn't pay during the year, here comes your yearly fine.
Did it help people? Yes, it did. But socialized medicine and mandated insurance are a band-aid applied to a missing arm. The issue is much broader than 'just give them health insurance'. If you can't bring the back-end costs down, you're just shifting the financial demand from one venue to another. The revenue is still going to reach the pharmaceutical manufacturers, and since the costs are now completely obfuscated they suddenly have the opportunity to charge even more because hey, who's going to notice? And that's only going to wind up benefiting distributors and insurance companies because they all make back-end deals to ensure that everybody walks away with pockets lined.
Meanwhile, regular people are bled dry.
The solution isn't to just give people 'free' things and expect them to be complacent, it's to figure out why things are the way they are and take steps to fix them. There are a lot of factors about why drug costs are so high-- having to pay for freeloaders on the system, having the manufacturers almost solely responsible for setting price points, having retail outlets need to do additional markup to break even, the fact that the US is subsidizing socialized medicine in dozens of other countries... and I'm sure there are many, many other factors that I'm not aware of. You fix these factors and the cost of medicine plummets.
The Fatriarchy
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 11 de Abr, 2018
Yes, use the number that more recognizably in these past few decades means to kill someone. That isn't going to get you put on a list or anything.
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2018
Oh, I get it. Because people will get addicted to meds at a cheaper price.
It costs an arm and a leg to get checked out. They would have to take their frustrations on Big Pharma for getting people hyped on drugs.
- Registrado
- 28 de Feb, 2018
I’ve been seeing those “Friends don’t let friends skip election” posts and they’re such dumb. They’re desperately trying to repeat 2008.
Here’s a better one, “Friends don’t let friends be passive aggressive or condescending to others because of their political beliefs.”
Here’s a better one, “Friends don’t let friends be passive aggressive or condescending to others because of their political beliefs.”
- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2018
Hospitals, not insurance companies or employers.
- Registrado
- 19 de Feb, 2018
Just one example are the illegal aliens coming into the ER for dialysis to treat the Type 2 diabetes they get from welfare tacos.
We're burning 285,000 dollars a year on each of the estimated 6,500 illegal invaders undergoing dialysis. Deporting them would save us 1,852,500,000 a year in taxpayer money.
You could fund a nice number of American health services with that alone.
- Registrado
- 12 de Jul, 2019
Hasn't that "word of the day" been up for a number of days now?
- Registrado
- 23 de Dic, 2019
Why couldn't it just be 8645
- Registrado
- 23 de Ene, 2015
Even though I don't go there myself, because Reddit's layout style just hurts my eyes, I really enjoy keeping tabs on the metrics for that Donald.win site because it's really interesting to see how quickly it grows when it's independent of Reddit's attempts to throttle them down. I know that the latest narrative coming out of the media is that "the election is hopeless Trump can't possibly win he's so far behind" but if that's the case, and his enthusiasm is so low, why do all of the sites like this keep growing at an alarming rate?
According to them, everyone's hopping off the train as quickly as they can. According to the statistics, ticket sales are going through the roof. Kinda' makes it hard to believe there's any truth to these statements, for me.
Hux
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 10 de Mayo, 2018
Better yet: "Friends don't let friends hang out with the miserable, sadsack joy sponges that are the Everything Is Political Crowd"
- Registrado
- 9 de Sep, 2019
Even their attempt at 1488 is overly long and autistic.
- Registrado
- 3 de Sep, 2014
Hilariously, the opposite issue was being faced by BernieBros, where the stupid amounts of energy online hid a weak candidate. It's why I prefer the method of just seeing how desperate and quick the fake news tries to cram down talking points as my barometer.
Trump's fine at the moment based on that.
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2015
The funny thing is the more the media tries to tank Trump for this election, the more they sound like him.
"Biden has a huge lead, truly impressive lead. He's surged to a lead like you've never seen. In the history of leads, there has never been such a lead as Biden's huge lead over Trump."
"Biden has a huge lead, truly impressive lead. He's surged to a lead like you've never seen. In the history of leads, there has never been such a lead as Biden's huge lead over Trump."
- Registrado
- 14 de Jun, 2018
Presumably, this is the kind of foreign influence (in this context, Egyptian Arabic) that Twitter supposedly hates having during elections.