- Registrado
- 30 de Nov, 2014
Nah I'm pretty sure Sabrina was a real person and the woman he was seeing at the time was right to kick his ass out for being a creep.
Tom, Fuck off and leave me alone!
- Iniciador del tema CammieDoxGirl
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2015
Hmmmm... never read that version of the story. The only ones I've seen have her getting upset that "Sabrina" is getting all the attention - either after an hour or after just a few minutes, depending on which of his lies is "true".
You don't get the impression from his fiction that he's talking out his ass? Like a person who thinks this is how a threesome works because he's never actually been involved in one?
- Registrado
- 30 de Nov, 2014
You have to remember that Tom is the unreliable narrator with a victim complex so put yourself in the situation as a rational thinking person.
Either the woman saw the writing on the wall and didn't want to have his creeping ass around.
Or
It wasn't his fault, but that young Jezebel who lured him to bed with her feminine charms and thus drew the jealousy of the other woman so she kicks him out instead of the young hussy?
Which one makes more sense?
- Registrado
- 30 de Mar, 2021
what the fuck does this mean to you, please explain it in your language
(To humans it means that you molested and attempted to rape a child who you knew already had a long history of sexual abuse. You only did not rape her because you were stopped by the other alleged pedophile in the room.)
As another self confessed child rapist, Chaggot, would say, that's pretty "sussy".
p.s. do you really have fleas dude? even for a dog molester that's pretty fucked up they are eating you wtf
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2015
Thomas may in fact be the ultimate unreliable narrator, which is why - in the absence of any physical evidence - the whole story being an allegory for his own "life" [such as it is] makes the most sense.
But that's just my read on it, which I admit could be wrong. So...
Taking his claims at face value, the woman was already deep into "Sabrina". He's stated "she" [she was a troon, right?] was a twenty-something, so she was already guilty of some form of deviate sexual contact with a minor.
He walks in and, so the story goes, is "invited" in between them; presumably that makes them both open to the event.
It's hard to fathom she either objected to the sharing aspect of the matter or the fact that "Sabrina" was a minor given her own conduct.
In that case he has to be lying about being "invited" into the scenario, otherwise why not just suggest that "Sabrina" was far more into the idea of bedding both of them than the other "woman"? Wouldn't that serve to further his fantasy about how she was "fully developed" and "mature"?
It would seem that the other party would be upset with both of them in the second scenario, and throw them both out - assuming she wasn't so disgusted with the idea of engaging in a three-way she doesn't kick them out before any invitation is offered or Thomas is in a position to engage in any act with "Sabrina".
Honestly, neither. The whole thing sounds like it was concocted by someone less informed on such matters than the Seinfeld writers.
But, again, that's just my take. We're reasonable people and we can agree to disagree.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ene, 2014
This is why I believe the scenario is missing something. The scenario he’s describing doesn’t happen in real life, certainly not to a goblin like Tom. And he’s always vague about what happened before and after. I believe it was one of the following:
1. Coercion. Sabrina was reliant on Tom for a place to stay, Tom made it clear that she’d better “pay her way.” The other woman put a stop to it when it became clear that Sabrina wasn’t into it. He denies coercion, but he also denies child molestation, so we have to work on the basis that he denies his interpretation of coercion.
2. Prostitution. Tom paid for a threesome, but he tried to get more than he paid for and was kicked out.
3. Rape. Tom came across two girls stoned out of their gourds and decided it was free real estate. It broke up when the other woman got her head together and fought back.
The thing about “oh she kicked me out because I only had one mouth and one hand” or whatever strikes me as saving face when his degenerate friends asked “what then?”
Easy J
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Jul, 2018
The part about the ladies calling the cops to remove him rings true. Tom lies about most things but is a poor liar and often volunteers details he later wishes he hadn't.
I have no doubt that the Sabrina story was a sexual high point for Tom and has morphed in his mind a lot in the many years he's revisited the memory. But the women involving the cops against Tom suggests that something more than a consentual 3-way pedophile-bang was afoot.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2015
The cops being involved was, allegedly, due to Thomas clocking some "emo twink" that was also living in their little commune when he involved himself [at "Meghan's" behest]. At least, that's according to the "fictional" original version of the story.
Do tell, Thomas, was that lie "true" or not?
- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2015
I bet Tom was kicked out because he genuinely shit the bed. Hippies might love au naturale but no one wants to fuck with chili cheese for lube.
He'd even try to save face by saying in some cultures it's considered an aphrodisiac to shart on a partner.
He'd even try to save face by saying in some cultures it's considered an aphrodisiac to shart on a partner.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 21 de Ago, 2018
Dude, buckshot doesn't work at that angle, just ask Katie Stubblefield, who tried because her boyfriend was cheating on her.
But it should work if it's loaded with slugs.
And @Tragi-Chan the Sabrina story is a combination of coercion and rape, no matter which way you dissect it. Only difference between them is if Thomas calls you a pedophile or an spastic once his fleas wakes him up.
- Registrado
- 9 de Mayo, 2016
keep pounding those keyboards , fan turds. i own you all and history is not going to be kind to any of you.
you "humans" are a very odd fringe who assume a lot of things missing huge chunks of data. the minor was capable of making informed decisions for herself and was never sexually abused by anybody . She gave herself willingly to a man in his early 20's when she was 14, living with him for a year before coming to us. she is an exceptionally talented artist who was more mature at 16 than any of you self loathing fucktards making up whatever feels good to you to satisfy your deep seated shame over whatever the fuck you're projecting the denial of at me.
the building is infested with sand fleas and i never molested any dogs. i had an extremely high strung sentry dog who masturbated a lot and the people she protected helped her get off. call that peculiar, but it is not at all the same as fucking a dog.
- Registrado
- 10 de Jun, 2021
How many times have you used that phrase and I genuinely hope you understand the irony behind you saying that.
- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2015
'Blah blah blah I'm Tom Tooter and while I'm not a dog fucking pedophile murderer I fingerbang canines, sexually engaged a minor and drove a woman to suicide. Not the same thing, mental midgets, I own you, bye Felicia'
- Registrado
- 9 de Mayo, 2016
in inches typed, you dip shits have me out gunned 100 to 1 or more.
- Registrado
- 10 de Jun, 2021
Gee, I wonder why.
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2015
I question whether or not that's true, given that you've been sperging online since people could sperg online.
- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2015
If we go by braincells it'd be unfair to compare ourselves to a jar of mayonnaise...you're more like a bucket full of cat shit.
- Registrado
- 21 de Ago, 2018
Congratulations! You're admitting that you're an slaveowner! In 2021.
It's still coercion.
Tom,
feeling someone up like this is legally classified as molestion.