Was chatting with a guy the other day and he was heavily concerned that YouTubers are making content about working with police and catching predators. I get it, you don't want there to be a profit incentive (YT ad revenue) behind finding and exposing pedophiles and even sensationalizing said content, because it may encourage false flags. He agreed that Roblox deserves everything it's getting, at least. But I didn't really have much to say regarding his disagreement with such a practice, other than "let us 'muricans have our legal manhunts and have God sort them out."
I'm out of the loop regarding Chris Hansen. What's fucked up about the guy?
Lynching is the American pasttime. Being without access to a legal system, the community sometimes needs to take justice in their own hands. Weeping race baiters ignore that the more whites than blacks were lynched before 1930.
Re: Chris Hansen. in addition toe
@Moss Monster 's points,
Chris Hansen didn't start any Anti-pedo crusade, he was selected by the network to be the face guy because he was a good interviewer and could swallow his disgust to interview pedos and get them to open up despite being caught in a nightmare scenario.
The pedo stings were arranged by other groups, some with network funding/resources. Network employees did all the leg work, found the bait actors, coordinated with LEO, etc. Chris Hansen just showed up with the cameras and tried (with a good success rate) to get them to talk on camera. He is (or at least is able to come off as) a likeable guy.
Outside of that role, again as pointed ut, he's jsut a normal retarded TV personality who got suckered into scams, was a retard with money, and fucked up at least one prosecution via incompetence with evidence (I forget the details)
All that said, he brought attention and awareness to the issues of online pedos so I don't overly care if he was paid or used it build his brand or w/e. He helped stop pedophiles and that's a good thing.
He's a washed up hasbeen since to catch a predator doing things like shilling scams, fake escobar/cartel affiliated smart phones and fucking up the onision investigation until it was totally non-viable.
[...]
Chris Hansen has been a joke for a long time, its why he fell out of the piblic eye completely and has spent years trying to come back. He is coasting off of the people who don't know what a massive fraudster faggot he is.
Concur, but he's still got a "brand" and if he's willing to draw attention to anything that stops Pedophiles, that's a good deed.
I like Chris Hansen. But him being the predator hunter guy and then shilling dick pills was pretty weird.
Yeah, don't blindly trust Hansen.
Honestly adults who have super childish hobbies like MLP or Roblox are at much higher risk of being pedos. Not saying they all are necessarily, but it's like a gay prostitute having aids. They might not, but do you want to trust it?
These people are usually lonely and with the internet the visual cues of the person on the other computer being a literal child doesn't cue as strong in the brain until they've become attached to the "idea". Then cope about old souls, etc.
You have
people Redditors falling in love with ChatGPT of all fucking things and I don't think they started with the intention of wanting to fuck a server rack.
Add to this... (accuracy note: I have forgotten the exact time frames involved, just the conclusions) reachers did some fucked up experiences with monkeys where they put baby monkeys into complete isolation for weeks/months/years and then would try to introduce them to monkey troops and I want to say it was something like more than month the isolated monkey would just be a complete social outcast forever unless it was very young.
But they discovered that if you took a monkey from the troop, isolated it for a year, then introduced it to a group of monkeys that were a year younger, it would reintegrate to Monkey society after a while. they tried it two years and I think three, with the same results, as well as isolating monkeys at different points. The result of the experiment was you could get isolated monkeys back into monkey society by having them join a peer group of their "socialization age" not physical age.
So a lot of the pedos getting kids 15/16/17 I think are just socially stunted and a highschooler matches their level of social maturity and they get attached because so ronery.
If you're 13, 14, 15, 17, whatever, and you're lusting after 9, 10 year olds or around 5 years less than your age as a minor, there's no helping you, you're a pedofaggot and the only cure is a 9mm through your head. You can cope and sneed about "muh heckkin mental healff" and "I'm a heckkin' minor" all you want, if you're grooming 1st-4th graders and kindergardeners to send you nude pictures as a teen, you lost the genetic lottery in terms of how your brain functions and develops, and no amount of "therapy" is gonna rewire you to not lust after kids when you get older.
I know when I was in high school any senior boys who went after Freshmen girls got socially ostracized, never mind younger then that.
When I was in school, it really depended. If seniors/juniors went after random freshmen, it was a minor scandal, because it was assumed he wanted a dumb girl he could worm into her panties with "don't you want to do what the older kids are doing? you aren't some middle schooler who thinks dating just stops with kisses are you?"
But if it was a girl they had some connection with - mutual friends, church, clubs, parents, lived in the same neighborhood - it didn't get any notice except for he was over 18 some jailbait jokes.
Same sort of thing as dating a highschool girl in college - dating your HS girlfriend, no issues. Dating a girl from the grade below who had a huge crush on you and finally worked up the nerve to talk you, that's ok. But just coming back after fall break with "I got a GF, I met her at a party, she's 16 and in highschool" was going to get you shunned as a pedo.
There was a guy who as a HS junior was dating a girl in final year of Jr. high and got ribbed for it a lot, but didn't face any real social ostracizing because she was the little cousin of one of his friends; basically it was clearly they were in contact for other reasons and just happened to develop a mutual attraction. And A) if her cousin was cool with it, who were we to say anything and B) dude would have had to have been seriously dating her, if he was using her or otherwise was a dog he'd have to answer to his friend/her cousin and probably the rest of his family.
No other person in highschool would have dared come out with the fact they were dating a junior highschooler.
A 17 year old HANGING AROUND 10 year olds, let along trying to hook up, was going to be mocked into compliance. And probably someone would have gotten a teacher.
Complete sociopaths like that kid is why the death penalty was developed.