Opinion The Racist, AI-Generated Future of Entertainment - The Atlantic Reviews the Will Stancil Show -- "Unlike other AI-generated content disseminated by the right, however, it is not slop."


On September 28, 1.1 million Americans tuned in for the 37th season premiere of the groundbreaking animated sitcom The Simpsons. A little more than a week later, another groundbreaking animated sitcom had its season premiere: The Will Stancil Show debuted on X, where it accumulated 1.7 million views. Since then, three more episodes have been released, piling up more than 3.5 million additional views and generating seemingly as many memes. The show, which was created by a provocateur-cartoonist named Emily Youcis, is notable for at least two reasons. It appears to be one of the first popular online television series made with the assistance of artificial intelligence—Youcis drew the cartoon and wrote the script, then used OpenAI’s Sora to bring the animation to life. And also, The Will Stancil Show is neo-Nazi propaganda.


The Will Stancil Show is all but impossible to explain to someone who is not addicted to The Website Formerly Known as Twitter, but I’ll do my best. The real-world Will Stancil is a 40-year-old Minneapolis lawyer and minor social-media celebrity who once ran for the Minnesota House of Representatives (and has written for The Atlantic). He has become a favorite target of the far right for being something like the Platonic pure form of the Trump-era liberal wonk. He is enthusiastic about policy minutiae, perpetually irate at various MAGA-world characters, and prone to brawling with racists online, and he has a lot of graduate degrees.

Youcis is a self-declared national socialist—a political philosophy more widely known by its contraction, Nazism, though she said that was not the most accurate way to describe her. “‘Commie’ is also short for communist,” she told me in an email, “but you wouldn’t report Xi Jinping as being chairman of the Chinese Commie Party, would you?” (She detailed her political views to me as follows: “I am a Nationalist, Pro-White, against predatory finance Capitalism, and critical of Jewish and Israeli foreign influence over the United States.”) Youcis attracted a cult following in the 2000s for a series of pitch-black comics she wrote for the website Newgrounds. These were mostly focused on a character named Alfred Alfer, a dog with multiple personalities struggling to process childhood sexual abuse. The series’ style was transgressive, low-fi, and intentionally janky. Youcis was also a longtime concessions vendor at Philadelphia Phillies games until she was fired in 2016 because of her stated interest in the “white-identity movement.”


She now posts under the name “Linda” on X, where she discusses such varied topics as “the Jews” (the party responsible for “flooding the country with non-whites”), Hitler (“the most slandered man in history”), and, of course, “the blacks” (who are to be sent “back to Africa” to “start the Fourth Reich”). The Will Stancil Show appears to be her first foray into animation in some time. Among its many shocking qualities is the fact that Youcis uses Stancil’s name and likeness without his permission, and that she is profiting, however modestly, from what amounts to an online harassment campaign.

When I spoke with the real Stancil about the show, he told me that it was “extremely surreal to become a main character of the online Nazi phantasmagoria.” Still, he said, “I’m mostly mad at the institutional failures, the commercial failures that have made this possible.” X once had policies that could have prevented The Will Stancil Show from being distributed on the platform. Since buying the company in 2022, however, Elon Musk has removed most of its content-moderation guidelines and infrastructure. “We had structures in place to forbid people like Emily Youcis from forming an enormous fan base and audience,” Stancil said. He continued, “Those structures were important, in my opinion. And those structures have been dissolved.”


The show is racist and offensive. Episodes range from four to eight minutes each, and feature cruel gags about Black people in Minneapolis and Cartoon Stancil’s bumbling attempts to help them; extended jokes about a chatbot raping Stancil, based on a real incident in which Grok, X’s in-house AI, provided a user with instructions for sexually assaulting Stancil; and, in one, a scene in which Tel Aviv gets nuked. Unlike other AI-generated content disseminated by the right, however, it is not slop. The episodes have clear narrative arcs, and the animation, though at times clunky, is decent. The Will Stancil Show’s racism, combined with its relatively high production quality, makes it a concerning sign of what might be ahead. Youcis has demonstrated that far-right creators can use AI to make good-enough entertainment, without needing to go through any gatekeeping institutions. And she’s proved that even people who don’t see themselves as bigots will watch this content—and in some cases laugh along.


The American right has a long history of taking advantage of new technologies. Conservatives are “more inclined to be early adopters,” A. J. Bauer, a University of Alabama media-studies professor, told me, because they have “felt marginalized by the media.” Examples of this phenomenon include Rush Limbaugh’s pioneering talk-radio show and Tucker Carlson, who began streaming from his own platform after being exiled from Fox News in 2023.

Until now, however, the right has generally had a harder time producing narrative television shows and films. These are more expensive to make than a radio or streaming talk show and thus have needed support from mainstream (read: liberal) gatekeepers. The Will Stancil Show reveals what can happen once narrative TV becomes cheap enough to make without buy-in from major studios. Compare The Will Stancil Show, for instance, with a sketch-comedy show that once ran during the Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim block, called Million Dollar Extreme Presents: World Peace. MDE, as fans call it, is deliberately slapdash; assessing the actual talent of its creators, or saying with confidence whether what you’re watching is good-bad or bad-bad, ironically racist or racist-racist, is difficult. (This same sort of plausible deniability is a defining characteristic of Trump’s political style.) That ambiguity in turn becomes part of the bit. The show was canceled in 2016, after one season, when BuzzFeed revealed that the creator, Sam Hyde, had voiced support for conservative conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate, and that the show’s racist jokes were less ironic than they had initially seemed. MDE returned to production this year, with help from funding by a private donor.


[Read: What happens when people don’t understand how AI works]

Youcis, however, doesn’t need to worry about getting kicked off the air by her employer, nor does she need substantial funds to make her show. Youcis told me that each Will Stancil Show episode costs $100 to $250 to animate. “Compared to a standard animated cartoon, which typically costs hundreds of thousands of dollars for even just a 10-minute-long piece,” she said, “this is an extremely small budget.” And although the creative process she describes is labor-intensive—Youcis told me that each episode takes her four or five days of work—it requires significantly less time and staffing than traditional animation, or a show, such as MDE, that employs live actors.

The Will Stancil Show also couldn’t survive were it not distributed on the free-speech Thunderdome that is X under Musk. Thanks to Musk’s removal of most of the policies that had prevented extremists from dominating the site, and to the noxiousness of Grok, unreconstructed Nazism runs rampant on the platform. The story here is similar in form, if not in content, to the rise of conservative talk radio, which likewise flourished in a time of loosening media standards. After the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, broadcasters no longer had to offer balanced portrayals of controversial topics, which cleared the way for highly partisan political radio and TV shows. Another similarity: Youcis’s audience includes people who don’t share her politics. Just as Limbaugh seemed to count more than a few liberals among his regular listeners, The Will Stancil Show seems to have fans in the center and on the left. “The Will Stancil Show is pretty funny,” the liberal pundit Noah Smith observed on X. He added that its style “shows that conservatives are starting to understand satire.” Other posters who do not appear to endorse hard-right politics echoed versions of this assessment, describing it as being “light-hearted” or praising it for not being “hateful.”


Indeed, The Will Stancil Show has plenty of red meat for bigots, but it cloaks its hate in just enough satire for non-bigots to think that the racism is a joke. As I watched, a few moments did make me laugh. “Nothing like getting some brewskis with a good friend after a long day fighting fascists on X.com,” the animated Stancil says in the opening scene of the first episode. “It do be like that, Mr. Stancil,” replies his Black friend Jamal, who listens patiently as Stancil drones on about housing policy. The show mostly relies on an on-the-nose screwball bigotry. But the “Mr. Stancil” line—which has become a meme on X—is one of Youcis’s subtler jokes, playing as it does on the incongruity between Cartoon Stancil’s progressive beliefs about racial justice and the fact that his Black “friend” (who, as far as I know, is not based on a real person) isn’t comfortable calling him by his first name. The scene sends up a kind of liberal many people may recognize: cheerfully “anti-racist,” yet frequently oblivious to the ways that they tokenize minorities, whom they treat less as peers and more as props in their own morality play.


[Read: Is this the worst-ever era of American pop culture?]

The episode goes on to follow Cartoon Stancil’s attempts to improve the lot of Minneapolis’s Black community, who are presented as 40-drinking, child-abandoning, street-fighting criminals. It ends with him and Jamal high-fiving on a hilltop, completely unaware that the city is burning down behind them. “Great to see that Black-studies degree put to work,” Cartoon Stancil observes. (Real Stancil holds a master’s degree in Reconstruction-era Black history but is nowhere near as buffoonishly “woke” as his cartoon doppelgänger.) The provocation Youcis seems to imply here goes something like this: Yes, I’m a bigot, but so, too, are these paternalistic liberal do-gooders. At least I’m open and honest about it.

It’s a provocation that she seems to want everyone to hear—not just her fellow white nationalists, but also people in the political mainstream. In a recent interview on The Backlash, an ultra-reactionary podcast, Youcis said that the goal of her show, which she calls “my propaganda,” is to Trojan-horse far-right politics into the mainstream. “I’m memeing myself into power,” she said, “and I’m memeing national socialism into the public.”


Youcis’s success at memeing her ideas into the public is the result of her ingenuity as a creator. It is also an example of the boundary-breaking possibilities of AI image-generation technology. Creators are already making animated music videos and short-form online shows that reference and build on The Will Stancil Show. One of these new cartoons lampoons the conservative writer and internet personality James Lindsay, who has drawn the ire of “America First” conservatives for his support of Israel, as well as for opposing racism and calling Nick Fuentes a “mad Nazi twink.” Given how quickly Youcis’s work has inspired imitators, it seems possible, even likely, that her series is merely the harbinger of a new entertainment landscape where extremist AI shows will jockey for our attention with more anodyne ones. Many people won’t be able to tell the difference, will be too desensitized to care, or—and this is Youcis’s wager—may start thinking that being a Nazi is no big deal.
 
I do find it funny. In the article they admit that they could keep conservatives out of entertainment media. I'm sorry, Mr Stancil does be like that.
Also, what would will stance or sue about? Its objectively parody.
Saturday Night Live and South Park have done way worse in recent years "pwning the conservicucks" and they are hailed as heroes by far left loonies even though they both are as intelligent and funny as a wet fart.
 
Does it have pictures of Ms. Youcis? Because I sure as fuck ain't clicking on an Atlantic article for the words.
1764266609776.png
 
So, radio 25 years ago and streaming this year are NEW TECHNOLOGIES.

You'd think the journalist trying to make this point would realize that it's not true and then just scrap that part. But no. A stubbornness is their defining feature.
It’s also just blarantly untrue. Rightoids are notoriously slow to adapt.
Hell, the left calls them reactionaries for a reason. What kind of reactionary is an early adopter for change??? Retardation and deception is all this journo knows.

It was leftoids and lolberts who adopted the internet and newer technologies of their time earlier than the rest. It was there commies could thrive in expanding their messaging via Mother Jones and the like.
It was there lolberts could expose themselves as freaks under the guise of free will absolutists.
The issue is that commies have pushed the overton window so left that these people who would be left-of-center in 1995 are now full blown rightoids to commies.

Does it have pictures of Ms. Youcis? Because I sure as fuck ain't clicking on an Atlantic article for the words.
She looks like an alternate dimension Nostalgia Chick, right down to the part where they hate kikes and admire the Hit man.
 
I thought Emily was the good one.
Well, I use the socially conventional frame of reference, obviously. Because the one thing I know from every comic, cartoon, Sci-Fi show or supernatural thriller, is when there's an alternate mirrror-verse Nazi (or similar) version of someone, they're the sexy version.

Star Trek mirror universes, Marvel or DC comics... it's a trope as old as time. Even possessed Dana from Ghostbusters suddenly goes from her long woolly dress to fiery red shoulderless gowns and stretching out on the furniture like a horny cat.

One moment a girl's all
1764278696951.png

the next it's
1764278713201.png

So if you tell me she looks like a mirror-universe Nostalgia Chick, well, all I can say is she excels at the trope.
 
100 years ago, the people flipping their shit over AI would've been ranting about "talkies" being a fad that could never replace silent films.
silent films were never replaced. it just became a different way to tell a story.
it's like saying the pen replaced the pencil. bitch. I still see both.

that being said. the inherit disadvantage that AI has, is the more you let AI just make every decision the less valuable it is.
it's the difference between:
"im going to use AI to generate my in-betweens so I can focus on key-frames" v.s
"Ai make video of mario getting stopped by police"

one has a purpose and makes someone more productive, and the other is disposable.
 
Última edición:
He is correct. AI has allowed for a tidal wave of right wing creations that would never have existed without it. It has never been a matter of leftists being more 'creative' or 'talented'. The cultural stranglehold of the left is maintained by their monopoly on the production side of the creative industries. The author of this piece admitted it blatently when he lamented how the evil nazis were bypassing the wise and fair liberal gatekeepers.

So has happened with every industry that has been democratized due to the internet. The right wingers slip through and start competing in spaces they would never have been allowed in before.

But, to calm this faggot down, some of the greatest AI content has been non political, so its not just the evil nazis using this technology. The Top Gear Dark Souls challenge vids, that blend real voice clips from Clarkson, Hammond and May with AI trained lines, are incredibly impressive and my favourite AI slop so far. No politics. No racism. Just three idiots trying to beat Dark Souls games without walking or some shit.

So its not just the Nazis surpassing Hollywood. Its gamers too, the leftist's second most hated identity group.
 
I like how the journalist made an earnest but overly wordy attempt to explain the humor behind the "It do be like that Mr. Stancil" line, like that copypasta about understanding the humor of Rick and Morty.
 
And she’s proved that even people who don’t see themselves as bigots will watch this content—and in some cases laugh along.
Because funny shit is funny and people love to laugh at sterotypes.
conservative conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate
'conspiracy'
He added that its style “shows that conservatives are starting to understand satire.”
Where has this nigger been? us tmore 'libs are more educated' bullshit.
nowhere near as buffoonishly “woke” as his cartoon doppelgänger.
Mr. Harper, did you look into Stancil at all? Like even a surface glance? Dude is whites kneeling before BLM incarnate.
 
1) what does racism have to do with the right?

2) why is racism bad?

3) why does racism equate to "neo-nazi" propaganda? Race is not a basis on anything related to nazism, other than Hitler praising Muslims constantly

I thought I just got done hearing about how creativity is fundamentally absent from the conservative DNA. How do you square this circle, Atlantic?
They cant. Its a lie. Artistry and creativity is right wing/conservative. By defintion
 
silent films were never replaced. it just became a different way to tell a story.
it's like saying the pen replaced the pencil. bitch. I still see both.
Not even remotely comparable or what I meant. Silent films used to dominate the box office. How often do you see new silent films being made? How often do you see them getting mainstream releases and premiers?
that being said. the inherit disadvantage that AI has, is the more you let AI just make every decision the less valuable it is.
it's the difference between:
"im going to use AI to generate my in-betweens so I can focus on key-frames" v.s
"Ai make video of mario getting stopped by police"
It still baffles me to see major studios like Disney through out generated material without anyone going over it first and cleaning things up.
 
How often do you see them getting mainstream releases and premiers?
the point I was making was someone deciding to make a silent film now would 100% be a creative choice.
an idea like "im only going use visuals to tell a story" never ages,

it's like a game with tank controls, there's an inherent advantage where a game director can have 100%
control over what the player see's at all time. and frees up a stick. an idea like that doesn't age it's just waiting for someone crazy to use it in a way no one has before.
some games that come to mind that plays with that idea are godhand and wonderful 101, both games being far better than 98% of modern releases
and both not selling well.

to keep it movie related Blair witch kick started the whole found footage genre. and that used some shitty camera and no budget
and it still found a way to make that creative choice to work. countless other people copied it, that found footage idea isn't going anywhere.
it's just waiting for someone to use it
 
The description of Will Stancil after hand wringing about “I’ll do my best” to explain the context.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo