Opinion The Racist, AI-Generated Future of Entertainment - The Atlantic Reviews the Will Stancil Show -- "Unlike other AI-generated content disseminated by the right, however, it is not slop."


On September 28, 1.1 million Americans tuned in for the 37th season premiere of the groundbreaking animated sitcom The Simpsons. A little more than a week later, another groundbreaking animated sitcom had its season premiere: The Will Stancil Show debuted on X, where it accumulated 1.7 million views. Since then, three more episodes have been released, piling up more than 3.5 million additional views and generating seemingly as many memes. The show, which was created by a provocateur-cartoonist named Emily Youcis, is notable for at least two reasons. It appears to be one of the first popular online television series made with the assistance of artificial intelligence—Youcis drew the cartoon and wrote the script, then used OpenAI’s Sora to bring the animation to life. And also, The Will Stancil Show is neo-Nazi propaganda.


The Will Stancil Show is all but impossible to explain to someone who is not addicted to The Website Formerly Known as Twitter, but I’ll do my best. The real-world Will Stancil is a 40-year-old Minneapolis lawyer and minor social-media celebrity who once ran for the Minnesota House of Representatives (and has written for The Atlantic). He has become a favorite target of the far right for being something like the Platonic pure form of the Trump-era liberal wonk. He is enthusiastic about policy minutiae, perpetually irate at various MAGA-world characters, and prone to brawling with racists online, and he has a lot of graduate degrees.

Youcis is a self-declared national socialist—a political philosophy more widely known by its contraction, Nazism, though she said that was not the most accurate way to describe her. “‘Commie’ is also short for communist,” she told me in an email, “but you wouldn’t report Xi Jinping as being chairman of the Chinese Commie Party, would you?” (She detailed her political views to me as follows: “I am a Nationalist, Pro-White, against predatory finance Capitalism, and critical of Jewish and Israeli foreign influence over the United States.”) Youcis attracted a cult following in the 2000s for a series of pitch-black comics she wrote for the website Newgrounds. These were mostly focused on a character named Alfred Alfer, a dog with multiple personalities struggling to process childhood sexual abuse. The series’ style was transgressive, low-fi, and intentionally janky. Youcis was also a longtime concessions vendor at Philadelphia Phillies games until she was fired in 2016 because of her stated interest in the “white-identity movement.”


She now posts under the name “Linda” on X, where she discusses such varied topics as “the Jews” (the party responsible for “flooding the country with non-whites”), Hitler (“the most slandered man in history”), and, of course, “the blacks” (who are to be sent “back to Africa” to “start the Fourth Reich”). The Will Stancil Show appears to be her first foray into animation in some time. Among its many shocking qualities is the fact that Youcis uses Stancil’s name and likeness without his permission, and that she is profiting, however modestly, from what amounts to an online harassment campaign.

When I spoke with the real Stancil about the show, he told me that it was “extremely surreal to become a main character of the online Nazi phantasmagoria.” Still, he said, “I’m mostly mad at the institutional failures, the commercial failures that have made this possible.” X once had policies that could have prevented The Will Stancil Show from being distributed on the platform. Since buying the company in 2022, however, Elon Musk has removed most of its content-moderation guidelines and infrastructure. “We had structures in place to forbid people like Emily Youcis from forming an enormous fan base and audience,” Stancil said. He continued, “Those structures were important, in my opinion. And those structures have been dissolved.”


The show is racist and offensive. Episodes range from four to eight minutes each, and feature cruel gags about Black people in Minneapolis and Cartoon Stancil’s bumbling attempts to help them; extended jokes about a chatbot raping Stancil, based on a real incident in which Grok, X’s in-house AI, provided a user with instructions for sexually assaulting Stancil; and, in one, a scene in which Tel Aviv gets nuked. Unlike other AI-generated content disseminated by the right, however, it is not slop. The episodes have clear narrative arcs, and the animation, though at times clunky, is decent. The Will Stancil Show’s racism, combined with its relatively high production quality, makes it a concerning sign of what might be ahead. Youcis has demonstrated that far-right creators can use AI to make good-enough entertainment, without needing to go through any gatekeeping institutions. And she’s proved that even people who don’t see themselves as bigots will watch this content—and in some cases laugh along.


The American right has a long history of taking advantage of new technologies. Conservatives are “more inclined to be early adopters,” A. J. Bauer, a University of Alabama media-studies professor, told me, because they have “felt marginalized by the media.” Examples of this phenomenon include Rush Limbaugh’s pioneering talk-radio show and Tucker Carlson, who began streaming from his own platform after being exiled from Fox News in 2023.

Until now, however, the right has generally had a harder time producing narrative television shows and films. These are more expensive to make than a radio or streaming talk show and thus have needed support from mainstream (read: liberal) gatekeepers. The Will Stancil Show reveals what can happen once narrative TV becomes cheap enough to make without buy-in from major studios. Compare The Will Stancil Show, for instance, with a sketch-comedy show that once ran during the Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim block, called Million Dollar Extreme Presents: World Peace. MDE, as fans call it, is deliberately slapdash; assessing the actual talent of its creators, or saying with confidence whether what you’re watching is good-bad or bad-bad, ironically racist or racist-racist, is difficult. (This same sort of plausible deniability is a defining characteristic of Trump’s political style.) That ambiguity in turn becomes part of the bit. The show was canceled in 2016, after one season, when BuzzFeed revealed that the creator, Sam Hyde, had voiced support for conservative conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate, and that the show’s racist jokes were less ironic than they had initially seemed. MDE returned to production this year, with help from funding by a private donor.


[Read: What happens when people don’t understand how AI works]

Youcis, however, doesn’t need to worry about getting kicked off the air by her employer, nor does she need substantial funds to make her show. Youcis told me that each Will Stancil Show episode costs $100 to $250 to animate. “Compared to a standard animated cartoon, which typically costs hundreds of thousands of dollars for even just a 10-minute-long piece,” she said, “this is an extremely small budget.” And although the creative process she describes is labor-intensive—Youcis told me that each episode takes her four or five days of work—it requires significantly less time and staffing than traditional animation, or a show, such as MDE, that employs live actors.

The Will Stancil Show also couldn’t survive were it not distributed on the free-speech Thunderdome that is X under Musk. Thanks to Musk’s removal of most of the policies that had prevented extremists from dominating the site, and to the noxiousness of Grok, unreconstructed Nazism runs rampant on the platform. The story here is similar in form, if not in content, to the rise of conservative talk radio, which likewise flourished in a time of loosening media standards. After the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, broadcasters no longer had to offer balanced portrayals of controversial topics, which cleared the way for highly partisan political radio and TV shows. Another similarity: Youcis’s audience includes people who don’t share her politics. Just as Limbaugh seemed to count more than a few liberals among his regular listeners, The Will Stancil Show seems to have fans in the center and on the left. “The Will Stancil Show is pretty funny,” the liberal pundit Noah Smith observed on X. He added that its style “shows that conservatives are starting to understand satire.” Other posters who do not appear to endorse hard-right politics echoed versions of this assessment, describing it as being “light-hearted” or praising it for not being “hateful.”


Indeed, The Will Stancil Show has plenty of red meat for bigots, but it cloaks its hate in just enough satire for non-bigots to think that the racism is a joke. As I watched, a few moments did make me laugh. “Nothing like getting some brewskis with a good friend after a long day fighting fascists on X.com,” the animated Stancil says in the opening scene of the first episode. “It do be like that, Mr. Stancil,” replies his Black friend Jamal, who listens patiently as Stancil drones on about housing policy. The show mostly relies on an on-the-nose screwball bigotry. But the “Mr. Stancil” line—which has become a meme on X—is one of Youcis’s subtler jokes, playing as it does on the incongruity between Cartoon Stancil’s progressive beliefs about racial justice and the fact that his Black “friend” (who, as far as I know, is not based on a real person) isn’t comfortable calling him by his first name. The scene sends up a kind of liberal many people may recognize: cheerfully “anti-racist,” yet frequently oblivious to the ways that they tokenize minorities, whom they treat less as peers and more as props in their own morality play.


[Read: Is this the worst-ever era of American pop culture?]

The episode goes on to follow Cartoon Stancil’s attempts to improve the lot of Minneapolis’s Black community, who are presented as 40-drinking, child-abandoning, street-fighting criminals. It ends with him and Jamal high-fiving on a hilltop, completely unaware that the city is burning down behind them. “Great to see that Black-studies degree put to work,” Cartoon Stancil observes. (Real Stancil holds a master’s degree in Reconstruction-era Black history but is nowhere near as buffoonishly “woke” as his cartoon doppelgänger.) The provocation Youcis seems to imply here goes something like this: Yes, I’m a bigot, but so, too, are these paternalistic liberal do-gooders. At least I’m open and honest about it.

It’s a provocation that she seems to want everyone to hear—not just her fellow white nationalists, but also people in the political mainstream. In a recent interview on The Backlash, an ultra-reactionary podcast, Youcis said that the goal of her show, which she calls “my propaganda,” is to Trojan-horse far-right politics into the mainstream. “I’m memeing myself into power,” she said, “and I’m memeing national socialism into the public.”


Youcis’s success at memeing her ideas into the public is the result of her ingenuity as a creator. It is also an example of the boundary-breaking possibilities of AI image-generation technology. Creators are already making animated music videos and short-form online shows that reference and build on The Will Stancil Show. One of these new cartoons lampoons the conservative writer and internet personality James Lindsay, who has drawn the ire of “America First” conservatives for his support of Israel, as well as for opposing racism and calling Nick Fuentes a “mad Nazi twink.” Given how quickly Youcis’s work has inspired imitators, it seems possible, even likely, that her series is merely the harbinger of a new entertainment landscape where extremist AI shows will jockey for our attention with more anodyne ones. Many people won’t be able to tell the difference, will be too desensitized to care, or—and this is Youcis’s wager—may start thinking that being a Nazi is no big deal.
 
its always fascinating how western civilization acts as if racism is the worst thing imaginable in human civilization
when it has been a constant driving force for civilizations to grow and improve
It's a foundational part of the liberal/boomer creation myth.

"Everything was all cumbayah until white people came along and invented racism for no reason at all. Jim Crow and Muh Six Gorillion happened just because whitey is just so mean and evil."
So, radio 25 years ago and streaming this year are NEW TECHNOLOGIES.

You'd think the journalist trying to make this point would realize that it's not true and then just scrap that part. But no. A stubbornness is their defining feature.
This is why I say the 2024 election was a fatal blow to ideological boomerism. Libs can no longer take for granted their dogmatic belief that they are always right and everyone who contradicts them is either stupid or evil.

Now they have to face the reality that their shit stinks like the rest of us mortals. Now they have to contend in the marketplace of ideas without censorship as a crutch.
 
All this AND the Atlantic calls her a neo-Nazi... 💕

1764216812959.png
 
I'm not going to read this but if The Atlantic is sneeding this hard about a piece of media I'll probably check it out.
 
It's a foundational part of the liberal/boomer creation myth.

"Everything was all cumbayah until white people came along and invented racism for no reason at all. Jim Crow and Muh Six Gorillion happened just because whitey is just so mean and evil."
Part of what I don't understand about people like that is, does this mean they would want to live in a predominantly black area if it meant poverty wasn't part of the equation, since poverty causes all the problems, in their view?

Like if there was some Atlanta suburb that was 95% black and then 5% Hispanic and Indian, would they want to live there? Do they see this hypothetical scenario as not being hell?

It always seems like the people with the least racism have to spend the least amount of time among other races, whereas the most racist people have the most exposure to other races. Yet white liberals and leftists act like racism is some sort of incorrect conclusion that only a stupid person would arrive at.

The backbone of all left-wing ideologies is some form of ignorance on any given subject, ignorance they're extremely proud of. In this case, they're ignorant of the behavior of other races and proud to be.
 
So it's fair to blame moderation policies on twitter for the existence of a YouTube video?

i actually didn't realize it was available on YouTube till now, I'd only seen bits of it on X. Judging from the view count on YouTube, next to no one is watching it there.

The Atlantic's obviously a Lefty Mag, I'm more saying that it's surprising that the articles not filled with more vitriol.
 
The American right has a long history of taking advantage of new technologies. Conservatives are “more inclined to be early adopters,” A. J. Bauer, a University of Alabama media-studies professor, told me
I thought I just got done hearing about how creativity is fundamentally absent from the conservative DNA. How do you square this circle, Atlantic?
Examples of this phenomenon include Rush Limbaugh’s pioneering talk-radio show
Oh right, by talking out of your ass.

Rush Limbaugh doing a successful radio show at the end of the 20th century is hard to read as an example of embracing new technology. We’re just sometimes good at doing good work in mediums that nobody is paying attention to.
 
When I spoke with the real Stancil about the show, he told me that it was “extremely surreal to become a main character of the online Nazi phantasmagoria.” Still, he said, “I’m mostly mad at the institutional failures, the commercial failures that have made this possible.” X once had policies that could have prevented The Will Stancil Show from being distributed on the platform.

Since buying the company in 2022, however, Elon Musk has removed most of its content-moderation guidelines and infrastructure. “We had structures in place to forbid people like Emily Youcis from forming an enormous fan base and audience,” Stancil said. He continued, “Those structures were important, in my opinion. And those structures have been dissolved.”
hanks to Musk’s removal of most of the policies that had prevented extremists from dominating the site, and to the noxiousness of Grok, unreconstructed Nazism runs rampant on the platform. The story here is similar in form, if not in content, to the rise of conservative talk radio, which likewise flourished in a time of loosening media standards. After the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, broadcasters no longer had to offer balanced portrayals of controversial topics, which cleared the way for highly partisan political radio and TV shows.
The subtle admission in this is article is that right/far-right ideas are the natural center of people's politics and views, and that it is only through censorship that even slightly left-wing views gain traction.
 
"Media is no longer being gatekept by money, this is a problem. Now look at those 1000+ articles on a grassroot tranny indie game that needs your financial support."
 
It always seems like the people with the least racism have to spend the least amount of time among other races, whereas the most racist people have the most exposure to other races. Yet white liberals and leftists act like racism is some sort of incorrect conclusion that only a stupid person would arrive at.
We call them luxury beliefs. Anyone practicing them other than bourgeoisie swine will get annihilated if they put it into practice. A stupid enough person will hold these beliefs to their dying breath.
 
Yes, let's all get assmad about what is essentially a longform shitpost!

Seethe, seethe harder, come over to the Dark Side where you too can live another life as a Clockwork Orange villain beating the living shit out of 80s punk rockers tagging an alley!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo