Re: Hamsters, people keep bringing up what are known facts and allegations (also, your theory that we'd be applauding her if she was some big game hunter is off the mark for me and I imagine many, many others).
Meanwhile, you keep alluding to some presumed "life she led" that deserves pity when there isn't really any evidence that her life was at all pitiable. I can feel sympathy for children of divorce in general, but I won't feel sympathy for a child of divorce who also did the heinous shit she did/planned to do - no matter how many "explanations" you try to ascribe to her actions. We have to hold individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of what background they come from. Where are you getting mentally incapable from, btw? Yes, she's a dumb Zoomer, but that does not an animal torturer make.
You keep digging in deeper and deeper without really bringing up any new points, as if repeating over and over how she may have had a tough life somehow makes her worthy of sympathy. You can say it 1000 times and I still wouldn't believe it.
There were videos of ant covered baseball bats, there were videos of hanged dogs in the woods, and chatlogs were used to corroborate evidence between people like Woof, Levi, Kero, etc. The chatlogs were supplementary, the chatlogs were used to cross reference known and documented events. The "Hard Zoo" channel leaks included mountains of video, images, RARs, etc. We pieced together the identities of the players involved with the videos, cross referencing the chatlogs, and a little help from people slightly less degenerate than the degenerates mentioned above.
My problem, and I think other's problem, with this is that there are only chatlogs, and one person corroborating the story, Allen, who had multiple posts in the Mega-Thread personally addressed to him. The one I remember most was edited, I believe, by Spooky, but it was an open letter to Allen from Bonktrash demanding he come out with the
REALLY REALLY REALLY REAL STORY OR ELSE!!
And then within a few hours the "interview" took place and claims of hamster boiling / eating were solidified in the minds of many on this site.
My problem is that words alone mean nothing. For example; people confess to crimes they've never committed, and evidence proves them innocent. Words alone only prove that words were said. It doesn't prove that actions were taken, it doesn't prove that events transpired.
There are very very few "known facts" as far as I'm concerned. Facts require evidence. Allegations require nothing, and there are a lot of alleged crimes and abhorrent behaviours, but allegations mean nothing. There are perfectly reasonable deductive arguments
against many of the allegations. One I've made several times is the high likelihood of the fetid stench of piss and infected rotting flesh on Max's feet/legs would absolutely incur complaints from the entire floor; and it's very unlikely that the Dorm Supervisor, or the RA wouldn't have been called over the putrid stench
if it were as bad as it would have to be to rot a dog's feet off.
Bullying a tranny to suicide is also not proven. As far as I know, there has only been one suicide and it was a real woman who worked as a bartender who has no proven relation to ILJ.
The hidden cameras are proven, but I guess that's not sensational enough.
The confusing and perverted artwork is proven.
The weird pedophiile fanfiction is proven.
The extent of her involvement in Chris-Chan is not proven. Her involvement with Praetor is proven. Her relation to WCT is proven, but the implications of those things only amounts to an animation she made for Praetor, and a few chatlogs with WCT.
The things people say are true should be completely disregarded, or put into a separate thread for "Unverified Allegations"
