💰 Grifter StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

Here we see a Stonetoss fan in his natural habitat: The Disqus comments.

1608081039529.png

(archive)

Blood Storm, whose Disqus profile reads "Anarcho-capitalist, and a friend" and includes a link to a Bitchute channel with a single doubtlessly-enlightening video titled "EndTheFed" posts a stunning rebuttal to an evidence-backed response to his statement that there are no Nazis in the brony community. And by "stunning rebuttal" I mean that Blood Storm posted a rather stunning image of a cartoon animal's ass end instead of discussing the issue further.

In addition to showcasing his excellent debating skills, Blood Storm is also doing Stonetoss's SEO very proud. I found this when I typed the phrase "how compelling, please face the wall" into DuckDuckGo's image search:

1608081440703.png


What a lovely advertisement for the site.
 
and comics. and subtlety. and art. and digital editing. and how to get under the author's skin.
Well in all fairness to those attempting to troll Stonetoss, Stonetoss is a much tougher nut to crack when it comes to getting a reaction at his expense. In took almost no effort for Garrison's trolls to get under his skin because virtually anything they did would piss him off badly and lead to him sperging out over it.
 
What are you guys talking about? Ben Garrison is the master of subtlety.

This one is so subtle, that I dare you to figure out what the point of this comic is in under 10 minutes.

wizard.jpg
 
What are you guys talking about? Ben Garrison is the master of subtlety.

This one is so subtle, that I dare you to figure out what the point of this comic is in under 10 minutes.

Ver archivo adjunto 1792196
You don't even need to bother parodying him at this point. Fake News CNN Tree throwing LIE apples at nobody in particular.
 
What are you guys talking about? Ben Garrison is the master of subtlety.

This one is so subtle, that I dare you to figure out what the point of this comic is in under 10 minutes.

Ver archivo adjunto 1792196
That's a genuine challenge, because it takes over 10 minutes just to read all the labels.
 
I think it was weaponised and aimed at fraternal association amongst men. It was never really about the gays, it was about making all men feel that close comradery would be viewed with suspicion.

I see a lot of conspiracies, so one might call me either a conspiracy theorist or someone in the know, depending on your own view of such things.

Pictures of a 100 years ago, these would be considered just friends. Nothing homosexual.
friends1.jpg

friends2.jpg

friends3.jpg



There is something that happened as a result of the classification of homosexuality. Something that started with Kinsey's false research. And I think the habits of not sending the signal of homosexuality is an organic result of that, not anything planned.

In fact, because countries where homosexuality does not have acceptance, do have acceptance of men acting in friendly and fraternal manner, seems to support the idea that acceptance of homosexuality is a deterrent to male affection between friends.
 
I see a lot of conspiracies, so one might call me either a conspiracy theorist or someone in the know, depending on your own view of such things.

Pictures of a 100 years ago, these would be considered just friends. Nothing homosexual.

There is something that happened as a result of the classification of homosexuality. Something that started with Kinsey's false research. And I think the habits of not sending the signal of homosexuality is an organic result of that, not anything planned.

In fact, because countries where homosexuality does not have acceptance, do have acceptance of men acting in friendly and fraternal manner, seems to support the idea that acceptance of homosexuality is a deterrent to male affection between friends.
I can definitely see that, and what's worse is that a lot of people are looking at these relationships through a modern lens to classify these men as secretly gay. One recent example I argued with someone about was the idea that Lincoln was actually gay because at one time in his life, he lived with a very close friend and slept in the same bed with him when they were both in their early 20's. Now this couldn't possibly be because they were both poor and buying two beds would've been prohibitively expensive, it had to be that they were gay.

There are also lots of cultures where homosexuality is less tolerated than in the West where straight men engage in acts that we would perceive as effeminate. In Argentina, for example, it's not uncommon for two male friends and even brothers to kiss each other on the cheek as a greeting, and I'm pretty sure similar forms of male affection are pretty common in the Middle East.
 
I see a lot of conspiracies, so one might call me either a conspiracy theorist or someone in the know, depending on your own view of such things.

Pictures of a 100 years ago, these would be considered just friends. Nothing homosexual

There is something that happened as a result of the classification of homosexuality. Something that started with Kinsey's false research. And I think the habits of not sending the signal of homosexuality is an organic result of that, not anything planned.

In fact, because countries where homosexuality does not have acceptance, do have acceptance of men acting in friendly and fraternal manner, seems to support the idea that acceptance of homosexuality is a deterrent to male affection between friends.
I can definitely see that, and what's worse is that a lot of people are looking at these relationships through a modern lens to classify these men as secretly gay. One recent example I argued with someone about was the idea that Lincoln was actually gay because at one time in his life, he lived with a very close friend and slept in the same bed with him when they were both in their early 20's. Now this couldn't possibly be because they were both poor and buying two beds would've been prohibitively expensive, it had to be that they were gay.

There are also lots of cultures where homosexuality is less tolerated than in the West where straight men engage in acts that we would perceive as effeminate. In Argentina, for example, it's not uncommon for two male friends and even brothers to kiss each other on the cheek as a greeting, and I'm pretty sure similar forms of male affection are pretty common in the Middle East.
photo_2020-05-28_13-48-53.jpg
 
Atrás
Top Abajo