- Registrado
- 17 de Mayo, 2019
That would require an understanding of comedy.yes
Ver archivo adjunto 1791273
imagine if the stonetoss parodies had half the wit or skill the garrison ones had
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
That would require an understanding of comedy.yes
Ver archivo adjunto 1791273
imagine if the stonetoss parodies had half the wit or skill the garrison ones had
and comics. and subtlety. and art. and digital editing. and how to get under the author's skin.That would require an understanding of comedy.
Well in all fairness to those attempting to troll Stonetoss, Stonetoss is a much tougher nut to crack when it comes to getting a reaction at his expense. In took almost no effort for Garrison's trolls to get under his skin because virtually anything they did would piss him off badly and lead to him sperging out over it.and comics. and subtlety. and art. and digital editing. and how to get under the author's skin.
Bruh just read the labels. Its what theyre there for. Witch=deep state. Duh. Tree=CNN. Come on.What are you guys talking about? Ben Garrison is the master of subtlety.
This one is so subtle, that I dare you to figure out what the point of this comic is in under 10 minutes.
Ver archivo adjunto 1792196
You don't even need to bother parodying him at this point. Fake News CNN Tree throwing LIE apples at nobody in particular.What are you guys talking about? Ben Garrison is the master of subtlety.
This one is so subtle, that I dare you to figure out what the point of this comic is in under 10 minutes.
Ver archivo adjunto 1792196
That's a genuine challenge, because it takes over 10 minutes just to read all the labels.What are you guys talking about? Ben Garrison is the master of subtlety.
This one is so subtle, that I dare you to figure out what the point of this comic is in under 10 minutes.
Ver archivo adjunto 1792196
It looks so stupid.You don't even need to bother parodying him at this point. Fake News CNN Tree throwing LIE apples at nobody in particular.
I think a lot of Ben Garrison’s stuff has lore, but lore that only makes sense to Ben Garrison.It looks so stupid.
But at least it's the one thing that had some lore to it.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IxuuIPcQ9_I
Wow, how transphobic of CNNIt looks so stupid.
But at least it's the one thing that had some lore to it.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IxuuIPcQ9_I
I never thought my autism could be successfully debunked, but here we are. I am officially too normie for Ben Garrison.It looks so stupid.
But at least it's the one thing that had some lore to it.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IxuuIPcQ9_I
I didn't even notice that until you mentioned it, that's hilarious, and the blue font is pure kino.The labelled bulge is a nice touch.
Missing the Jumbotron screens behind him with the "breaking news" ticker repeating what he just said.Hail to the Kang:
Ver archivo adjunto 1794479
C: On the shoulders of giants as they say…
M: You should see the size of megaphone the Jewish guy gets.
Archive
WHERE’S YOUR CROWN KANG NOTHING!?Hail to the Kang:
Ver archivo adjunto 1794479
C: On the shoulders of giants as they say…
M: You should see the size of megaphone the Jewish guy gets.
Archive
I think it was weaponised and aimed at fraternal association amongst men. It was never really about the gays, it was about making all men feel that close comradery would be viewed with suspicion.The hermeneutic of gay suspicion only really exists in the West and only within the last ~30 years.
I think it was weaponised and aimed at fraternal association amongst men. It was never really about the gays, it was about making all men feel that close comradery would be viewed with suspicion.
I can definitely see that, and what's worse is that a lot of people are looking at these relationships through a modern lens to classify these men as secretly gay. One recent example I argued with someone about was the idea that Lincoln was actually gay because at one time in his life, he lived with a very close friend and slept in the same bed with him when they were both in their early 20's. Now this couldn't possibly be because they were both poor and buying two beds would've been prohibitively expensive, it had to be that they were gay.I see a lot of conspiracies, so one might call me either a conspiracy theorist or someone in the know, depending on your own view of such things.
Pictures of a 100 years ago, these would be considered just friends. Nothing homosexual.
There is something that happened as a result of the classification of homosexuality. Something that started with Kinsey's false research. And I think the habits of not sending the signal of homosexuality is an organic result of that, not anything planned.
In fact, because countries where homosexuality does not have acceptance, do have acceptance of men acting in friendly and fraternal manner, seems to support the idea that acceptance of homosexuality is a deterrent to male affection between friends.
I see a lot of conspiracies, so one might call me either a conspiracy theorist or someone in the know, depending on your own view of such things.
Pictures of a 100 years ago, these would be considered just friends. Nothing homosexual
There is something that happened as a result of the classification of homosexuality. Something that started with Kinsey's false research. And I think the habits of not sending the signal of homosexuality is an organic result of that, not anything planned.
In fact, because countries where homosexuality does not have acceptance, do have acceptance of men acting in friendly and fraternal manner, seems to support the idea that acceptance of homosexuality is a deterrent to male affection between friends.
I can definitely see that, and what's worse is that a lot of people are looking at these relationships through a modern lens to classify these men as secretly gay. One recent example I argued with someone about was the idea that Lincoln was actually gay because at one time in his life, he lived with a very close friend and slept in the same bed with him when they were both in their early 20's. Now this couldn't possibly be because they were both poor and buying two beds would've been prohibitively expensive, it had to be that they were gay.
There are also lots of cultures where homosexuality is less tolerated than in the West where straight men engage in acts that we would perceive as effeminate. In Argentina, for example, it's not uncommon for two male friends and even brothers to kiss each other on the cheek as a greeting, and I'm pretty sure similar forms of male affection are pretty common in the Middle East.