Illiterate Wanderer
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 5 de Sep, 2020
He's specifically talking about violence being the deciding factor, not just refusal to debate.I get that. I just think the margins are a lot thinner, maybe just in our time, but maybe also in his.
If you take his statement completely at face value, then you only need to establish that any group is unwilling to have an honest debate. But I think that even honest good groups are easy to frame as if they don't want an honest debate.
You have the foundation for suppresion of speech, now you just need an excuse to use it on x group.

