Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
🤡 GoonclownSteven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Doe v. Bonnell
1:25-cv-20757— District Court, S.D. Florida
Docket No.
1:25-cv-20757
Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
17 de Feb, 2025
Nature of Suit
440 Civil Rights: Other
Cause
28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Defendant
Last Filing
7 de Jun, 2026
Parties (2)
Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 351)
#
Date
Description
Filing
276
7 de Jun, 2026
AFFIDAVIT in Support re 262 Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanctions Under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence of Joan S. Peters filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter dated 11-12-2025 from Andrew B. Brettler)(Garcia Perez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/08/2026)
Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion re 262 Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanctions Under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence. filed by Jane Doe. (Garcia Perez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/08/2026)
AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re 262 Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanctions Under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence of Andrew B. Brettler filed by Steven Bonnell, II. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Morgan, Michael) (Entered: 06/01/2026)
AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re 262 Plaintiff's MOTION for Sanctions Under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence of Steven K. Bonnell filed by Steven Bonnell, II. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Morgan, Michael) (Entered: 06/01/2026)
Let's say there is a man in his late 30s who:
-is bisexual
-has recorded a woman having intercourse without her knowledge and then distributed that video without her consent
-has exchanged sexual messages with a 17 year old girl and then received child porn from her
-is a recreational drug user
-was raped as a child
-distributed a pornographic video without the consent of one of the participants
Is such a man more or not more likely than the average man to have ever sexually abused his son?
I saw you say something about Kyle Kulinski a few pages ago (you may have called him an idiot but I don't have the message in front of me). What's your position there? I watch secular talk a lot and I'm curious to hear criticism.
I'd be willing to believe Destiny would try and get his kid laid with a prostitute. I'd even be willing to believe he'd be in the room for it and recording.
Sexual abusers love making light about their abuses for a number of reasons. It trivializes their crimes. It helps them conceal themselves because credulous morons (no offense) will go "Oh well if he's comfortable joking about it that must mean there's no cause for alarm" They also get sick thrills from pulling the wool over people's eyes.
Destiny is a pathological liar and serial abuser. I frankly put nothing past him. Or are the Epstiny comparisons no longer apt in your mind?
In either case I see no reason to give Tiny anything resembling benefit of the doubt. As far as I'm concerned its entirely possible he'd sexually abuse his son unless conclusively ruled out otherwise.
Bert and Null don't want us to be unhinged in the thread because it makes us look bad and Destiny would probably just stop flailing if we all played nice and talked about water and vampires and said Destiny wasnt a pedophile. So behave. I know I will.
so anyways the truth is Destiny fled Nebraska right around the time Nathan was entering into the prime range Destiny likes to target for molestation. He fled to stop himself from molesting his own son. It was a brave piece of white hat pedophilia and the fact none of you will even give him his flowers for it is disturbing. Whats that?
Not married to melina anymore? doesnt have any friends or business contacts left to network with? no reason to live 2000 miles away from his son anymore?
the urge to molest is just still so strong. he cant even make it through a school trip with Nathan without sexting other pedophiles about the children on the bus. maybe when nathan is 18 destiny can return. like with food shops the urge will fade when the risk and taboo are removed.
I had just assumed they were doing some sort of step parent home schooled sex-ed roleplay that just so happened to involve Destiny having a 14 year old son and Britt having two 15-16 year old daughters. And the implication it was their kids was just up in that plausibly deniable grey area that was open for either Britt or Steven to find enticing.
With Britt and Steven's psychology (S-class Raped), they were both in an implicit game of incest chicken at that point and refused to pull back because they lack the constitution to point out something wrong happening they're deriving any pleasure from in the moment.
Yeah, I think they were probably role-playing parents with children, or two teenagers. But I don't see anything that implies that they were actually roleplaying as Nathan, or that Destiny asked for pictures of her kids, etc.
I would look down on someone who engages in age play or molestation fantasies, but just because a woman has a CNC kink doesn't mean she actually wants to be raped. Some sexual taboos are turn ons for people just because they're a taboo. Also, based on what both of them said, he did pull back after she started bringing up real kids.
So when someone is able to provide something that shows otherwise, I'm all ears.
Nah nigga, this is soft. And not calling out that destiny maybe grooming his kid is way worse for the kid than getting bullied at school because other kids think it's a possibility.
'Whoaa we have to let him rape because the person he rapes might be embarrassed if it's known that he raped them.'
Destiny is capable of really heinous stuff, it's not out of the question and worth considering. What are we here for if not to gossip and theorize about his batshit terrible behavior?
Yeah, you can and should gossip about things you can substantiate. He age plays. He jerked off to a 17 year old and didn't bother to make sure another human being was safe. He should be mocked mercilessly for that. You don't have any reason to think he groomed his son.
You’re right bro, I definitely should not have considered the fact that Destiny has had a pro incest stance, has a sexual fantasy of turning a minor into a sex slave, role played step-parent molestation and opted to distance himself from his child when that trip caused him to see himself spiritually as a bad person. I should also not have considered that overdosing has a high correlation with abuse victims. I also should not have considered that someone who abuses other people’s children might consider doing it to their own.
So this is why I think you're a retard. You will sit here and say that Destiny has had a pro-incest stance, but you would not actually be able to show that to me. If I asked you to lay out what Destiny has said about incest and pedophilia, you would not be able to do that. So I'll do it for you. What Destiny has said about incest is that incest in and of itself is not morally wrong, it's morally neutral. What makes it wrong is when other factors come in, like power dynamics between a father and son.
In fact, even when all factors are not in play, he still said that the social stigma aspect of pedophilia and incest would make them wrong because they could have an adverse affect on someone. So everything he's actually said about incest and pedophilia actually precludes the idea that he would molest his own child. I get that a lot of you became interested in this lolcow when the court stuff happened, but there's actually a rich history of lolcowdom for you to enjoy if you ever want to go look at it. Let me know if you want me to link you.
And the other reason you're a retard is because you don't even know more recent things he's said about it, like when he was fighting with Ben and Grace Thorp, who were rumored to be fucking. Do you think Destiny was saying that was good? He didn't. He ridiculed them for it and called them disgusting.
So yeah, when you guys say retarded shit that even his haters can point to as being wrong, it makes us all look retarded.
Instead of suggesting that one of his cheap sluts would go in to make an underaged Nathan a man just to appease daddy destiny’s depraved fantasies, I should have just created deep lore about cum vampirism and hydration. I’ll be better next time.
Yeah, so the difference between some of the posters in this thread who make wild speculation is that they can back it up with something. Blav, for example, says a lot of wild shit that he walks back later. But he has an encyclopedic knowledge of the guy, so he's generally not bringing up stuff that's retarded. And when he does, he'll reconfigure if someone has a conversation with him about it.
Also I didn't create that deep lore. Destiny doesn't drink enough water. I'm spitting stone cold facts there.
But even if I were making things up, I wouldn't do it about his teenage son whilst also posting messages in the thread about how his son needs to keep his head up, bro.
Let's say there is a man in his late 30s who:
-is bisexual
-has recorded a woman having intercourse without her knowledge and then distributed that video without her consent
-has exchanged sexual messages with a 17 year old girl and then received child porn from her
-is a recreational drug user
-was raped as a child
-distributed a pornographic video without the consent of one of the participants
Is such a man more or not more likely than the average man to have ever sexually abused his son?
I saw you say something about Kyle Kulinski a few pages ago (you may have called him an idiot but I don't have the message in front of me). What's your position there? I watch secular talk a lot and I'm curious to hear criticism.
No, people who were raped as children are not more likely to rape their own children. What IS true is that pedophiles are more likely to claim that they were abused as children. But that's not the same thing, and it's also likely that a lot of those pedophiles are lying. I know you put a lot more stuff in there, but no, I would not take those things as automatic indicators that someone has molested their child.
I saw you say something about Kyle Kulinski a few pages ago (you may have called him an idiot but I don't have the message in front of me). What's your position there? I watch secular talk a lot and I'm curious to hear criticism.
You're always welcome to DM me if you want. I honestly don't remember what I was saying about Kyle. I was probably just making fun of him for his hair because it annoys me.
For me personally, I've never called him Epstiny that I can recall. I've never been of the opinion that he's specifically targeting children and teenagers because I think there's enough out there where I'm not really interested in referencing one or two quotes when I know a bunch of other quotes that paint a different picture. My position is and has always been that he's an opportunist and that he's reckless and dangerous to people around him. I think he should be mocked mercilessly for Rose/Solo/etc, but until I see something that shows me he's actively looking for children, which could exist, I'm not going to firmly state that.
I don't particularly care if other people do it, especially if it's funny, but there are some things that are said that really aren't substantiated by much and are kinda retarded.
I also have the same opinion about public and private opinions as my hero Hillary Clinton. There are some things I speculate on that I wouldn't post if I think it's harmful to another person that I think doesn't deserve to be harmed.
Bert and Null don't want us to be unhinged in the thread because it makes us look bad and Destiny would probably just stop flailing if we all played nice and talked about water and vampires and said Destiny wasnt a pedophile. So behave. I know I will.
Yeah except I didn't say anyone had to play nice. Do you see me criticizing Code Cave's post?
Also, whichever one of you created a PresidentSunday account to do this on my post about Code Cave being President Sunday is my favorite user in this thread.
Edit: Actually on further inspection, this PresidentSunday registered in 2023 and his ONLY interaction is calling me autistic which is even funnier.
If that's the real President Sunday, start posting motherfucker.
Bert and Null don't want us to be unhinged in the thread because it makes us look bad and Destiny would probably just stop flailing if we all played nice and talked about water and vampires and said Destiny wasnt a pedophile. So behave. I know I will.
I think it's more like, there's enough incriminating things about Destiny that you shouldn't feel the need to flail around and make up even worse shit about him.
Destiny's fans are genuine niggers who will repeat bullshit claims about Hasan Piker because they heard it from Destiny and they hate Hasan. Personally I like to think I'm above the type of nigger who likes Destiny, and that if I say something about Destiny, it's because there's something concrete to latch on to.
A little bit of transparency, about a month ago I made a post suggesting that Destiny may have given up his main apartment in Miami Beach to move into the studio apartment he used as his podcast studio for Bridges and Anything Else. Not only have I not seen a crucial piece of evidence that would hard-confirm my suspicion, I got clued-in to a conversation he had with Dan where he talked about vacating that studio apartment a month or two earlier, which would directly contradict the conclusion I made from a few messages I saw from Destiny. I'm less confident in my original claim now than I was a month ago. In a sense, I did the same thing I'm complaining about right now, making up spurious shit to make Destiny look worse. While I still have a hunch I'm right, I still think I should have given my claims far stronger caveats or just not posted them at all. And that's for a claim that just embarrasses Destiny, not an allegation of a vile act against him.
I also have the same opinion about public and private opinions as my hero Hillary Clinton. There are some things I speculate on that I wouldn't post if I think it's harmful to another person that I think doesn't deserve to be harmed.
Nah nigga, this is soft. And not calling out that destiny maybe grooming his kid is way worse for the kid than getting bullied at school because other kids think it's a possibility.
'Whoaa we have to let him rape because the person he rapes might be embarrassed if it's known that he raped them.'
Destiny is capable of really heinous stuff, it's not out of the question and worth considering. What are we here for if not to gossip and theorize about his batshit terrible behavior?
He has zero boundaries around his kid either way. When he was about to visit for the summer Destiny planned to take him along to dinner dates with various women, and Dan had to explain to him why that’s inappropriate. Of course Destiny couldn’t wrap his head around it.
Not to mention he made him sleep in a different apartment during the visit so he wouldn’t interrupt his goon time, to which his kid overdosed on stimulants. I still don’t think that’s spoken about enough.
When he was about to visit for the summer Destiny planned to take him along to dinner dates with various women, and Dan had to explain to him why that’s inappropriate. Of course Destiny couldn’t wrap his head around it.
He has zero boundaries around his kid either way. When he was about to visit for the summer Destiny planned to take him along to dinner dates with various women, and Dan had to explain to him why that’s inappropriate. Of course Destiny couldn’t wrap his head around it.
Although I agree that's true, it's not the same thing. Dan was asking him what he was going to do with Nathan while he was going out on dates, and Destiny said he would just take Nathan with him. Which is a terrible idea, but he wasn't talking about taking him on double dates or finding women for him.
While he was was arguing with Ben Thorp around that same time the two of them got into arguments over who was a worse parent, and Destiny mentioned several times that his child and family members wouldn't ever come forward accusing him of incest because Ben's wife and son are the ones who accused Ben of sleeping with Grace. He even mentioned that he never talked to Nathan about the women he was sleeping with or the people Melina was sleeping with. And I don't think there's ever been any accusations that he does. He's obviously irresponsible by talking about it so publicly where his son can find it, but that's not the same thing.
I didn’t think he meant finding women for him. It’s clear he wanted to bring him on his own dates, but kids shouldn’t be meeting random people you’re having sex with as it can have many negative psychological effects. That’s (partly) why most single parents have boundaries around who ends up meeting their children. Dan spent some time explaining that he shouldn’t do it and Destiny had a hard time understanding why. He severely lacks boundaries at a fundamental level, which is itself a red flag for what we’re talking about, but no I don’t think he’s actually done it. Just fantasizes about someone molesting a fictional teenage son of his.
This is actually quite informative because those who violate children were often violated as children themselves. See Russell Taylor, Donald Smith, and R. Kelly. It has to do with genetic confounding. And a large part of it is that these people who have been violated have been conditioned to see it as normal thing, so they have no problem violating someone else's child. Destiny certainly is a bucket crab. I noticed that when he attacks Hasan or Pxie, he spends a lot of time preoccupying himself with how privileged they are to be born in wealthy, prosperous families. When he does this, I think he's alluding to more than just being poor or having a speech impediment as a kid.
Although I agree that's true, it's not the same thing. Dan was asking him what he was going to do with Nathan while he was going out on dates, and Destiny said he would just take Nathan with him. Which is a terrible idea, but he wasn't talking about taking him on double dates or finding women for him.
So this is why I think you're a retard. You will sit here and say that Destiny has had a pro-incest stance, but you would not actually be able to show that to me. If I asked you to lay out what Destiny has said about incest and pedophilia, you would not be able to do that. So I'll do it for you. What Destiny has said about incest is that incest in and of itself is not morally wrong, it's morally neutral. What makes it wrong is when other factors come in, like power dynamics between a father and son.
In fact, even when all factors are not in play, he still said that the social stigma aspect of pedophilia and incest would make them wrong because they could have an adverse affect on someone. So everything he's actually said about incest and pedophilia actually precludes the idea that he would molest his own child. I get that a lot of you became interested in this lolcow when the court stuff happened, but there's actually a rich history of lolcowdom for you to enjoy if you ever want to go look at it. Let me know if you want me to link you.
And the other reason you're a retard is because you don't even know more recent things he's said about it, like when he was fighting with Ben and Grace Thorp, who were rumored to be fucking. Do you think Destiny was saying that was good? He didn't. He ridiculed them for it and called them disgusting.
So yeah, when you guys say retarded shit that even his haters can point to as being wrong, it makes us all look retarded.
Yeah, look brother the first time I was made aware of Destiny was when he was repeatedly gaped by Mr Metokur, that’s when I first heard of his stance on incest. I’ll be honest, the mere suggestion and his mealy mouthed response was enough to preclude any further investigation. If that makes me retarded, thats cool bro I don’t have a gay internet persona to defend, I just hate this nigga for who he is as a person. Fuck him, fuck his friends and especially fuck his enemies that inadvertently run defense for him.
I do find it bizarre that this particular Lolcow has a uniquely high bar that needs to be met for any negative connotation to be attributed to him. King of Poz is considered a Chomo for shit Destiny wakes up and does on a Monday morning. It’s only with this guy that if we didn’t, see his deformed little weenis penetrate a fucking child, we cant call him a pedo. Despite the fact that this nigga repeatedly toes that line and frequently crosses it.
I cant even dare to speculate that this erratic, hyper-sexual nigga might cross lines that erratic, hyper-sexual motherfuckers often cross. This cunt has issues with consent, has repeatedly been found to have an inappropriate interest in underaged people and has not only expressed interest in, but has been found to be actively engaging in molestation role-play. However, the speculation that he might combine those things into an unholy trinity of fuckery is what’s unhinged.
Unlike this retarded online debate landscape, in the real world if a person repeatedly says and does things that indicate they are something, you take them at their words and actions. In the real world, signalling that you’re a degenerate pedophile who gets turned on by molestation often means people treat you like a fucking pedophile who will probably actively molest people. In the real world, Steven has done enough to get himself raped and shanked in Gen Pop.
Although I agree that's true, it's not the same thing. Dan was asking him what he was going to do with Nathan while he was going out on dates, and Destiny said he would just take Nathan with him. Which is a terrible idea, but he wasn't talking about taking him on double dates or finding women for him.
While he was was arguing with Ben Thorp around that same time the two of them got into arguments over who was a worse parent, and Destiny mentioned several times that his child and family members wouldn't ever come forward accusing him of incest because Ben's wife and son are the ones who accused Ben of sleeping with Grace. He even mentioned that he never talked to Nathan about the women he was sleeping with or the people Melina was sleeping with. And I don't think there's ever been any accusations that he does. He's obviously irresponsible by talking about it so publicly where his son can find it, but that's not the same thing.
A close female friend of mines worst memories of her divorced father were being taken on dates with the various women he was seeing after her parents marriage had ended. Nearly 15 years later and there was still a distinct scorn and resentment in her voice about it.