- Registrado
- 12 de Mayo, 2017
Not particularly sure what you expected comfort-wise from on-ears
I hate in-ear far more than on-ear.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Not particularly sure what you expected comfort-wise from on-ears
They're not as bad as Beats, that's about the best I can say about them. And even that isn't necessarily true when you factor in bang-for-your-buck.Does BOSE not still stand for Buy Other Sound Equipment?
Are the M20X even worth?Second, Audio-Technica.
They aren't shit yet, AFAIK, so you can actually get what you pay for.
I mean Dankpods is funny but you don't have to blindly follow his advice on everything. There's more to chi-fi IEMs than KZs and SR850s have annoying sibilance unless you use a very specific EQ to even out the sound (and there's really only one good EQ profile out there).Something something Sennheiser Hurr Durr Six Hunnies.
I've been served well by Samson SR 850 cans through several years, even after needing to resolder and insulate the cable. For the <$50 price their quality can't be beat.
For portables I went with KZ Pro IEMs but if I were to go for over ears I'd like to try out some Koss KPH30s, I hear good things about them.
I'd also like to try some Philips SHP9500s since they're supposed to be really good for $100 and have good 3rd parts for them.
I'd be interested in the Mass HD 6XX from Massdrop for $200 instead of the $600 for the 600s as some kind of "end game" set of headphones.
That is not what I have, but probably.Are the M20X even worth?
It's a little bit of both: a really good pair of headphones can bring out the nuances of music even on a lossy recording, and conversely even a perfectly mixed and mastered FLAC with sound like ass through some bass thumping gamerAssuming you guys get your music from slobptube / spotify, do audiophile-grade headphones even make a difference? Wouldn't the compression and other space-saving quality-degrading algorithms have made the base file low quality anyway?
TLDR, wouldn't the audio file quality be the bottleneck and not the headphones?
I've never noticed sibilance or anything being off from them except crackling and dropping out when the wire came loose and needed re-soldering and insulating. Five minutes later and it's back to normal. I can't really complain for an audio set up for $50 all in with sales and holiday deals that's lasted almost 5 years.There's more to chi-fi IEMs than KZs and SR850s have annoying sibilance unless you use a very specific EQ to even out the sound (and there's really only one good EQ profile out there).
My opinion has been that the codec wars are pretty much solved. At the usual bitrates of 320 to 130 AAC, AC3, and Opus are pretty much transparent for most lossy audio needs. FLAC has been around for decades now and solved the lossless compression dilemma. The single most important thing about the file is the mixing. No amount of audiophile snake oil or weird proprietary encoding formats are gonna make up for a dogshit mix. Just my two cents.Assuming you guys get your music from slobptube / spotify, do audiophile-grade headphones even make a difference? Wouldn't the compression and other space-saving quality-degrading algorithms have made the base file low quality anyway?
TLDR, wouldn't the audio file quality be the bottleneck and not the headphones?
Oh man that reminds me of when I was back in school, one of the neighbor kids got his Beats earbuds back from being RMA'd for a broken cord or something. Kid gets on the bus all excited but as soon as he pulls them out of the little case and plugs 'em into his phone the cord comes clean off the TRS like it wasn't even put back on. Needless to say I don't remember him ever getting another pair of Beats after that.They're not as bad as Beats, that's about the best I can say about them.