Culture Salty Cuck Concern Trolls in Latest tl;dr IRL Post - With a thunderclap and the stench of sulfur, Hillary Clinton.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/09/clinton-blames-sanders-for-election-loss-in-new-book/

"Because we agreed on so much, Bernie couldn’t make an argument against me in this area on policy, so he had to resort to innuendo and impugning my character," Clinton wrote. "When I finally challenged Bernie during a debate to name a single time I changed a position or a vote because of a financial contribution, he couldn’t come up with anything. Nonetheless, his attacks caused lasting damage, making it harder to unify progressives in the general election and paving the way for Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign."

Clinton also discussed the fact Sanders isn't a Democrat, something he has openly acknowledged on several occasions despite of running for president as a Democratic candidate, and used this to characterize him as a disrupter.

"[Sanders] didn’t get into the race to make sure a Democrat won the White House, he got in to disrupt the Democratic Party," she wrote.

The former secretary of state is evidently frustrated about Sanders's effect on the election and seems to have ongoing questions about his motives for running.

With that said, Clinton applauded Sanders for mobilizing young people and getting them excited about politics, and said he was right to say Democrats need to spend more time focusing on working families.

But, in the end, Clinton thinks Sanders "was fundamentally wrong" about the Democratic Party and wishes he was a "proud Democrat" like her.

Spoiler

 

[Varg Did Nothing Wrong]

Is NPR getting better?

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

It's not even a correct analogy in the context of the book. Everyone fawns over Hermione's brilliance. The only ones who don't hate her because of a million other reasons than she's a girl.

 

[Linako 2.0]

Lol the literal Nazi who wrote The Turner Diaries?

Yes, is there a problem with that?

 

[AnOminous]

Yes, is there a problem with that?

Other than the fact that he directly inspired Timothy McVeigh to murder a bunch of children by deliberately targeting a day care just because it was a federal building?

 

[Linako 2.0]

Other than the fact that he directly inspired Timothy McVeigh to murder a bunch of children by deliberately targeting a day care just because it was a federal building?

So because a mentally troubled person listened to his "progrems", that invalidates what he says?

 

[AnOminous]

So because a mentally troubled person listened to his "progrems", that invalidates what he says?

If you openly advocate terrorism and then a terrorist takes your terrorist ideas seriously and goes and commits terrorism based on your advocacy of terrorism and murders 20 children, yes, I'd say your terrorist ideas are pretty shit.

 

[ICametoLurk]

Does she even know what she is advocating, in a meritocracy all positions in society would be determined by test scores that anyone could take at any time. She would still have the chance to lose to someone like Trump. Just it would like losing an university entrance exam. Fuck, could even lose to a homeless guy who licks door-knobs if it was a "true meritocracy".

Ancient China had a similar system where you should pass a set of exams to become an official - guess how much corruption and nepotism this caused. China was repeatedly raped by all its neighbors, and only its sheer size kept them alive as people.

 

[Linako 2.0]

If you openly advocate terrorism and then a terrorist takes your terrorist ideas seriously and goes and commits terrorism based on your advocacy of terrorism and murders 20 children, yes, I'd say your terrorist ideas are pretty shit.

Did Pierce actually commend Mcveigh for what he did?

 

[Coldgrip]

Does she even know what she is advocating, in a meritocracy all positions in society would be determined by test scores that anyone could take at any time. She would still have the chance to lose to someone like Trump. Just it would like losing an university entrance exam. Fuck, could even lose to a homeless guy who licks door-knobs if it was a "true meritocracy".

She knows what she's saying but:

1. She doesn't actually believe in it.
2. The majority of her supporters don't really have any clue what a meritocracy is and she knows this.
   
3. If elected she'd put in place something else, anything else, that would benefit her the most.

Hillary is a lying sack of shit that believes it's her turn to rule and that she was cheated out of her birthright so she'll use whatever means necessary to get what she believes is rightfully hers.

 

[AnOminous]

Did Pierce actually commend Mcveigh for what he did?

Even he wasn't retarded enough to explicitly implicate himself in one of the worst terrorist attacks in American history.

Hillary is a lying sack of shit that believes it's her turn to rule and that she was cheated out of her birthright so she'll use whatever means necessary to get what she believes is rightfully hers.

Watching her spend the rest of her declining years shitting herself in impotent rage that the bad man took away her toy is really the main thing that makes me half-okay with Trump winning.

 

[Herbert Hoover]

Even he wasn't exceptional enough to explicitly implicate himself in one of the worst terrorist attacks in American history.



Watching her spend the rest of her declining years shitting herself in impotent rage that the bad man took away her toy is really the main thing that makes me half-okay with Trump winning.

The only thing that would make it better is if she decides to run again

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

The only thing that would make it better is if she decides to run again

The talk right now is Michelle Obama is thinking of running.

 

[Doc Cassidy]

Did Pierce actually commend Mcveigh for what he did?

Actually, he did. Right before his execution Pierce said Mcveigh was ''a man of principle'' who was ''willing to accept the consequences'' for what he did. Referring to the bombing he said ''Probably, on the whole, it was helpful,''

 

[BR55]

The talk right now is Michelle Obama is thinking of running.

I know the DNC is in a bad place right now but they can't be that desperate right?

 

[Hyperion]

I know the DNC is in a bad place right now but they can't be that desperate right?

Nobody wants to get suicided by Hilldawg. Also they should be focusing on the midterms anyway. The ones in 2018, not 2016.

 

[BR55]

Nobody wants to get suicided by Hilldawg. Also they should be focusing on the midterms anyway. The ones in 2018, not 2016.

Focusing on the upcoming Midterms won't do the Democrats much good. The Senate map next year is horrific for Democrats. Taking back the House is nigh impossible under current districts and voting trends. The best they can hope for is taking back some Governorships and state houses.

 

[Hyperion]

Focusing on the upcoming Midterms won't do the Democrats much good. The Senate map next year is horrific for Democrats. Taking back the House is nigh impossible under current districts and voting trends. The best they can hope for is taking back some Governorships and state houses.

I'm not too worried about it. I'm already expecting a massacre.

 

[CWCchange]

If you openly advocate terrorism and then a terrorist takes your terrorist ideas seriously and goes and commits terrorism based on your advocacy of terrorism and murders 20 children, yes, I'd say your terrorist ideas are pretty shit.

Jack Thompson said something similar about vidya and school shootings. If you're calling for banning stuff interpreted by crazy fucks, we can start with Al Gore, because the Unabomber read his book as gospel.

Ancient China had a similar system where you should pass a set of exams to become an official - guess how much corruption and nepotism this caused. China was repeatedly raped by all its neighbors, and only its sheer size kept them alive as people.

Which Ancient China? It was a series of distinct kingdoms which ultimately got mongrelized to extinction by the Golden Hoard, who adopted the Song Dynasty's culture. It's basically the Brazil of the East, albeit reversed.

 

[Absolutego]

I know the DNC is in a bad place right now but they can't be that desperate right?

They're still heavily stuck in the name recognition mindset and haven't caught on after 18 months of the electorate savaging the Bush and Clinton families that maybe that's a bad tactic.

If they manage to get over this attitude post-2018 they'll probably run Kamala Harris in 2020. If they were feeling really adventurous and wanted to completely break with prior behavior and maybe actually win an election they'd run someone like Tulsi Gabbard.

 

[BR55]

They're still heavily stuck in the name recognition mindset and haven't caught on after 18 months of the electorate savaging the Bush and Clinton families that maybe that's a bad tactic.

If they manage to get over this attitude post-2018 they'll probably run Kamala Harris in 2020. If they were feeling really adventurous and wanted to completely break with prior behavior and maybe actually win an election they'd run someone like Tulsi Gabbard.

Personally my moneys on Warren but Harris is my second choice. Depends on which of the coast the DNC favors at the moment. Not like it really matters anyway. One is a shrill Anti Wall Street/Big Corporation, but please don't check where my campaign funds are coming from, Massachusetts Liberal. The other is a smug Technocrat "Demographics is Destiny" "Diversity is our strength" California Neo Liberal. Both are equally unappealing to any State outside of the West Coast or anywhere further south than Maryland on the East Coast.