Richard C. Kyanka v. Ashley K. Martin (2020) - Lowtax's second divorce

Couldn't this be Lowtax's mother on behalf of his estate fighting it more?
It's Ashliey trying to get the money that was ordered deposited out of Richart's trust account, and then trying to see if there is enough left in the fee deposit he made with his lawyer to cover the rest of the judgment.

The motion to set aside is Richart saying that the judgment wasn't enforceable because Low T died before the judgment was final for appeal purposes and therefore case law says it's void.

We dont know who's in charge of his estate. If he had no will the court would have to appoint somebody and that only happens after an application is made to open the estate by an interested party. I believe that takes a death certificate, which are slow.

I actually feel bad for Scott Richart here, he's kind of in a bind. Kenny wrote an order that's not really legally enforceable (his speciality) and now he's stuck fighting half of Jackson County to defend that money from Erin and Kenny so he doesn't wind up getting sued by whoever ends up being the beneficiaries of the estate.
 
I actually feel bad for Scott Richart here, he's kind of in a bind. Kenny wrote an order that's not really legally enforceable (his speciality) and now he's stuck fighting half of Jackson County to defend that money from Erin and Kenny so he doesn't wind up getting sued by whoever ends up being the beneficiaries of the estate.

Would you mind elaborating on what exactly is going on?
 
1639239487474.png

The squabble continues. The garnishment appears to have been served upon Richart's office, and Erin is fighting the motion to set aside judgment. It's a curious spectacle.
 
The squabble continues. The garnishment appears to have been served upon Richart's office, and Erin is fighting the motion to set aside judgment. It's a curious spectacle.
Family court is the vilest thing in existence.

What's the difference between a rapist and family court? A rapist quits fucking you when you're dead.
 
D626956A-379B-4317-919B-5327E562BD93.jpeg
Motion for interpleader. IANAL: This appears to be about having the court decide who gets what, so the garnishment shit will stop.

It’s like that Bible story where two whores are fighting over a miscarried corpse and it’s turning into a disgusting tug-of-war and King Solomon calls for a sword to chop the dead baby in half before it’s torn completely to pieces and eaten because the whores are getting hungry.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo