Pretentious Arthouse Films

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I avoid Godard like plague. He represents the worst of French "intellectuals": the silly obsession with communism; the anti-Americanism; the pointless deviation from film-making conventions in the name of "deconstruction"; the absolute contempt towards the audience.

But then I also avoid Woody Allen like plague and consider him the representation of the worst of American "intellectuals".
 
Última edición:
Shoplifters (2018 ), directed Hirokazu Kore-eda

Palme d'Or winner of 2018, and one of the last appearances of beloved actress Kirin Kiki before her death at the age of 75, this film is a naturalistic study of a atypical yet loving family at the margin of urban existence. It is an eminently praiseworthy film: go see it if you have the chance. Still, I have one big misgiving about this film, and this prevents me from giving it my highest accolade.

But first, the premise and the good things: living in a dilapidated house is a family of five: Old Grandma Hatsue, the couple Osamu and Noboyu, the college-age granddaughter Aki, and the boy Shota. All these people either engage in petty theft, or have other questionable dealings, to supplement the income of lowly laborors Osamu and Noboyu. One night, after shoplifting in a supermarket, Osamu and Shota found a thin, shivering five-year-old girl, Yuri, alone in the streets. They brought her back to their tiny hovel, thinking they would feed her and then send her home. But, having found bruises and burns on her arms and overhearing quarrels just outside her home, they decided to keep Yuri for her safety.

Watching the family's adoration of this new member will move even the most wooden of hearts, and it is perhaps the first time that little Yuri feels family love. But, business is business, Yuri has to learn to steal. Here, admirably, the director observes their shenanigans from an emotional distance, refuses to either lay moral blame, or to portray them as helpless victims. The family's hut may be small and run-down, but food is always in abundance (also beer, which is unreasonably expensive in Japan). Old Gramma Hatsue even has money to frequent Pachinko places. This family is not stealing for survival. Osamu and Noboyu justify their law-breaking by claiming that those who never felt love will never want to show concern to others, but we would never mistake them as cold-hearted, given the simple yet continual affection they show to each other, and especially to their little adoptee. It is precisely the scenes in which the unloved expresses love -- as when Noboyu embraces little Yuri when she burns Yuri's old clothes, having nabbed her some new ones. A tear runs down Noboyu's face in spite of herself, the significance of which is not revealed until much later -- that the film is at its most resonant.

The first half of the film are a series of heartfelt family vignettes, but almost imperceptibility, the focus shifts to the real protagonist of the film, the preteen boy Shota. Osmau has taught Shota his twisted ethics: what is in the store doesn't really belong to anyone; as long as you don't bankrupt the store, you're good. Shota cannot accept this, especially after an incidence involving him, Yuri, and an old storekeeper. This incidence, another act of kindness, haunts his conscience. We also learn that Osmau is not Shota's biological father, and that Shota, an earlier adoptee himself, can never bring himself to call Osmau Dad. What Shota does next will tear this family asunder.

My big dissatisfaction comes from this "dramatic" second half. Director Kore-eda, who has so far depicted the family with such amoral restraint, casts a vilifying lens on police officers. The very representation of cold bureaucratic efficiency, they interrogate the adults sternly and ruthlessly, cynically questioning their motives, while using cunning guile on the children. This all seem too calculated, too designed, on the part of the director to elicit a emotional response from the audience, who, having been living with this family from winter to summer in the span of more than an hour, just know how blind and cruel the cops are. The worst is the confrontation between Noboyu and a female officer, who accuses Noboyu of having a grudge against mothers because she is infertile, so she kidnaps children in revenge. This is bordering on caricature.

Still the bond of family, despite not related by blood, persists over travail. Again, the director refuses to take stances. If Osmau, as he attests to Shota and confirming what the cops have said, is prepared to betray and abandon Shota. What is that Shota does in the first place, if not an act of betrayal? If the director exercised such moral balance in the police interrogation scenes, and did not milk cheap drama out of manufactured villains, this film would have been a masterpiece. Still, as it stands, Shoplifters is a considerable achievement.
 
Última edición:
Manta Ray (2018 ) - Written and Directed by Phuttiphong Aroonpheng

I was recommended this film as an example of Thai surrealist cinema. I watched with the least amount of background info and preconceptions -- I only knew it is about immigrants -- and while I enjoyed the human drama, I was not terribly impressed by its surrealism. When I read reviews, however, I was astounded by how every reviewer understands the theme -- the plight of stateless Rohingya Muslims -- and its relation to the surrealist scenes.

The film opens with a man wielding a submachine gun in a jungle. The jungle is illuminated, not just with the sum, but with rotating disco lights. The man himself is festooned with Christmas lights, which forms a sort of camouflage among patches of light and shade. In another part of the jungle, a band of men is burying a corpse. One of the gravediggers takes off his red ski mask and reveals a head of hair dyed blond.

This nameless man is a fisherman by trade (the credit only lists him as "Thai Fisherman"). He lives alone; outside of work he prefers to keep to himself, drinking himself to vomit in his hut. Fisherman has a strange hobby though: he would venture into the jungle and dig out crystals (which he locates by putting his ear to the ground), bring the crystals to the water's edge, and, whistling, cast them one by one to the sea. He think doing so will attract giant manta rays.

One day, during his adventure in the mangrove, Fisherman found a wounded man lying unconscious in the black mud. He brought him to town, paid a doctor to treated his wounds, and slowly nursed him back to health. The man, whose facial features are more South-Indian than Thai, is mute. Fisherman names him Thongchai, after a famous singer.

Fisherman teaches him to dive and to ride the motorcycle, and brings him along in his gem-finding and manta ray ritual. The mute Thongchai becomes Fisherman's confidante. Their simple, carefree lives is depicted in a most touching manner. We also learn that Fisherman's wife left him in a most degrading manner.

One night, Fisherman receives a call from a "boss", urging him to do a job that he has "quit". Soon after, Fisherman disappears altogether. Thongchai, who has waited for his return every day, is told that Fisherman has drowned. A dejected Thongchai retreads his past adventures with Fisherman, alone, voiceless, doe-eyed and vision-haunted. This is where the film is at its most poetic, sad, and powerful.

Then Fisherman's ex-wife appears, and the story takes a melodramatic turn. Her dealing with Thongchai has not gone unnoticed, and it is here that I feel director Aroonpheng is perhaps too blatant in his metaphor -- the immigrant as the impostor. At this point, the surrealism only gets in the way, and the disco-ball-in-the-jungle effect is more distracting than magical. Whether you find the ending effective or not would depend on whether you can look past this flaw.

Manta Ray is undoubtedly inspiring to people familiar with the geopolitics of Thailand and its neighbors; those who are not can nevertheless enjoy a deeply human drama. But if you are simply looking for interesting surrealism or arresting cinematography, you might be disappointed.
 
Under the Skin was really good. Scarlett Johansson trapeezing around Scotland seducing men lol
 
Atrás
Top Abajo