Law President Biden pardons his son Hunter Biden - The decision, which was first reported by NBC News, is a reversal for the president, who repeatedly said he would not use his authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence.

Original article: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/joe-biden-issue-pardon-son-hunter-biden-rcna182369



WASHINGTON — Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Sunday night, a reversal for the president, who repeatedly said he would not use his executive authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence.

"I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice — and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision," Biden said in a statement.


Hunter Biden is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 12 for his conviction on federal gun charges. He also is set to be sentenced on Dec. 16 in a separate criminal case in which he pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges in September.

The pardon is expected to cover both his gun charges conviction and his guilty plea.

A senior White House official told NBC News, which was the first to report on the pardon decision, that the president decided over the weekend to grant his son a pardon and began to inform his senior aides Sunday.

The president also spoke about his son's struggles with addiction in his statement Sunday night, saying that his political opponents were trying to "break" him by going after Hunter.

"No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong," Biden said in his statement. "There has been an effort to break Hunter — who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me — and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough."

Biden, 82, is using his pardon power to ensure Hunter Biden does not spend time in jail as he nears the end of his term in the White House and has no future election to face. In recent months, he has said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence.

“I will not pardon him,” he said in June after a jury found Hunter Biden guilty on three federal gun charges.

The president has discussed pardoning his son with some of his closest aides at least since Hunter Biden’s conviction in June, said two people with direct knowledge of the discussions about the matter. They said it was decided at the time that he would publicly say he would not pardon his son even though doing so remained on the table.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last month that Biden’s position has not changed.

“We’ve been asked that question multiple times. Our answer stands, which is ‘no,’” she said.

Asked Monday whether the president is still committed to not granting clemency for his son, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates said: “The president has spoken to this.” Pressed about whether Biden’s position has changed, Bates replied, “I don’t have anything to add what he said already.”

First lady Jill Biden has also said her husband would not pardon their son.

“Joe and I both respect the judicial system, and that’s the bottom line,” she said in an interview in June.

Hunter Biden’s criminal trial in June was the first involving the child of a sitting president.

Pardoning him after that trial would have ignited a political firestorm for his father, who was campaigning for re-election. Republicans have for years attacked Hunter Biden over his foreign business dealings and accused him and the president of corruption. They have also argued that Hunter Biden was getting special treatment by the Justice Department because of his father’s political power.

GOP criticism reached a peak in July 2023 when Hunter Biden pleaded guilty in a deal with federal prosecutors over the tax and gun charges, which collapsed after a judge raised questions about it. That development led Attorney General Merrick Garland a couple weeks later to appoint the U.S. attorney investigating Hunter Biden, David Weiss, as a special counsel.

Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race in July, but a pardon before last month's election also could have generated political blowback on the candidacy of Vice President Kamala Harris after she took his place on the Democratic ticket.

Together, the 12 counts Hunter Biden is convicted of or has pleaded guilty to carry a maximum prison sentence of 42 years. But the maximum sentences typically are not given out for convictions of these crimes. The Justice Department has said, for instance, that while the tax charges carry a maximum sentence of 17 years, sentences are typically less than that.

Asked in an interview in June whether he would rule out a pardon for his son, Biden answered, “Yes.”

Days later, after Hunter Biden was convicted on federal gun charges by a jury in his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware, the president said in a statement that he would respect the outcome. He then told reporters he would abide by the jury’s decision.

“I’m extremely proud of my son Hunter,” Biden said. “He has overcome an addiction. He’s one of the brightest, most decent men I know, and I am satisfied that I’m not going to do anything. I said I abide by the jury decision. I will do that, and I will not pardon him.”

Neil Eggleston, who was White House counsel to President Barack Obama, told NBC News that “if I were his White House counsel, I would encourage him to pardon his son.” He said he has not been contacted or consulted by the White House about any pardon preparations.

“The clemency power has few limitations and certainly would extend to a Hunter Biden pardon,” Eggleston said.

Eggleston’s opinion echoes that of other former Justice Department and White House officials previously involved in presidential pardons who told NBC News that they thought Biden should exercise this power in advance of the incoming Trump administration.
 
I agree, but I’m supposed to be outraged at Biden’s drug addict, non-governmental employee son getting a pardon?
But when Jared Kushner’s dad get’s the same - AND is given a job on top of that, there’s cricket chirps.
The theatrical pearl clutching looks even more hollow.
Charles Kushner faced punishment and served his time fully, the media from all corners criticized Trump that his pardon was pointless grandstanding as it changed nothing.
 
>Brandon not only saving his ass but also making the entire Democratic Party look like spineless worms
Just like we drew it up Jack.
Also
IMG_7232.jpeg
The Thousand Cock Stare
 
John Adams was too smart and it was disastrous sending him to France because he tried dealing with the french like they were human beings (admittedly, a retarded thing to do...) while Ben Franklin, a retard who flew a kite in a thunderstorm, did well.
They also hated Adams, who they saw as a stick-in-the-mud incel prude, which he kind of was, while Franklin and Jefferson were both such utter degenerates they fit right in.
 
Maybe the role is taken more seriously in other countries but in the USA to my understanding ambassadorships are usually "patronage" positions that don't really amount to much but act as a way to reward someone or someone's relative for giving money to a victorious presidential candidate.
Pretty much the exception to this is the countries where if things go pear-shaped a nuclear war pops off. There you might find some competence.
look at all of the pearlclutching by the same people who voted in a 34-time felon
Frankly I'm seeing a lot more people, at least here, who basically grasp why Biden would do this while flipping the bird, even people who ordinarily despise him.
 
You never get to take up your little moral high horses ever again after this shitshow. You're scum, you elect scum and you protect scum.
It's scum all the way down bro.
I used to wonder why right-wingers who won civil wars tended to be quite sadistically brutal to their enemies. Like, what would drive Franco's Nationalists to kill Republican prisoners in Spain with bullfighting lances when they had machine guns on hand, or Suharto's army to massacre entire families because they harbored a Communist son, or compel Pinochet's soldiers to train dogs to rape leftist women?
The Spanish Civil War was insanely brutal by European standards. You generally, at least at that time in history at least after the Treaty of Westphalia, would have had to go to Africa or South America to see savagery like that. The commies just had better propaganda. If you watch something like Pan's Labyrinth, great movie but more or less bullshit historically, you'd think the commies were freedom fighters while the fascists were sadistic pig monsters.
Or rather, not even that it happened; but that left-wingers from these goons up to a former Watergate prosecutor are cheering it, wishing he had gone even further and actually murdered more of his political enemies before pardoning himself & anyone involved in that, and just generally blaring full 'NO BAD TACTICS ONLY BAD TARGETS' at max volume.
I'm no fan of Nixon (although he gets a worse rap than he deserves and other than his fatal flaw was arguably actually a good leader), but Ford pardoning him was the right thing to do. It was way more important for the country to move on and get over it than to act out some vindictive revenge fantasy.
So, is trump gonna pardon all the capitol chimpout boomers too? seems like nothing compared to this TBH.
He should have and it was absolutely dickless of him not to do that back when it could have done some good. He shafted the kind of core supporter who would actually physically put their asses on the line for him while pardoning a bunch of goddamn niggerfaggots who hated him and his supporters.

I've never been able to wrap my head around that one.
 
Última edición:
I wouldn't be surprised if the Trump administration turns over every rock in Ukraine and China in order to find more crimes to charge Hunter Biden with. Whatever they find might implicate Joe Biden as well. We may not have seen the end of this.

What a surprise, right?
He cleared him of all crimes all the way back to 2014 when he started working for Ukraine. As much as I wish the same, Joe knows exactly what his son did and have to cover any and all tracks.
 
Well we have had a Retard President, Black President, Adderall President, Dementia President and an now an Adderall President again.
Its time we had a Crackhead President. It's his turn.
Marion Barry died, though.
Listen, I think Hunter Biden is a disgusting piece of shit, but unhinged Joe Biden is sorta winning me over. First he gives a big middle finger to the Democrats for sending him to pasture, then gives a big middle finger to Kamala for pretty much backstabbing him, proceeds to piss all over her campaign.
I loved when he bit three babies. Tell me he wasn't laughing his ass off internally thinking about the headlines that would get.
At this point the fish are sticking their heads of the water to scream for the hooks when he isn't fishing. Wonderful to watch.
At this point HHH isn't even bothering to put on bait, he's just throwing hooks in the water.
I hope that's sarcasm
There's a reason the Presidential pardon power exists, despite the possibility and actuality of it often being used corruptly (like this Hunter pardon). You can't (for very good reason) generally go directly after a sitting President legally except with an arcane process that has never actually removed a President from power. So instead, they spitefully go after his friends and family.

So to a certain extent, the President has the power to ameliorate that kind of political retaliation. In this case, Hunter is pretty much a piece of shit (and more importantly his corruption had serious impacts on our foreign policy outcomes and may have even been part of the cause for us getting mired in an absurdly expensive foreign conflict). I just find it hard to get that outraged about it, taken in context.
I'd have had more respect for Joe had he not lied and said that he would accept the judgement of the jury. This really does make him (and as a consequence, the Democrats) look bad.
Democrats should look bad. They are bad.

Worse, they're incompetent. They lost to a dickhead like Trump, not even a close call, just a total humiliating trampling.
if you went to the capital to protest because a politician told you to you're a retard and i laugh at your misfortune. boomers should keep their grey man larping confined to Waffle House and Walmart
Actually being willing to do something to stand up for your beliefs is admirable even when both you and the beliefs are dumb.

It's pathetic that these people have been smeared in the media as "insurrectionists" for doing nothing more than standing up for their beliefs and bullshit that would be misdemeanor trespassing type shit, but is treated as a violent revolution by the very people who stanned for literal communist terrorists burning down businesses, even local businesses like bookstores, and literally throwing bombs at federal buildings.
 
Última edición:
Actually I think this one was timed precisely to make the smallest controversy as possible.
Hunter was going to be sentenced in 2 days and according to this article the guideline minimum was 15 months. That is a long boring time to be in in FCI Otisville but that is a time many convicts are expected to shut their mouths and deal with. If Biden pardoned him for a relative short stint it would look worse.

Instead he stopped it at the last minute, so we’re not even really asking if Cunter avoided a deserved prison stint. Biden and Democrats are acting like the judge was going to give him a decade or more in prison which I think we can all agree was never going to happen. Even if it did why make the gamble?
It occurred to me last night after posting that the pardon now snuffs any reason not to put everything relating to Hunter Biden out into the public. Because if he's not going to see any consequences of it, why bother hiding it? Also if he did any illegal shit that another country might want to extradite him for, I'm not sure if a pardon covers crimes done under the purview and jurisdiction of a foreign nation.

Not that I think Trump will seek to pin him to the wall, anyway. He and the rest of that family are probably just going to get off scott-free.
At this point HHH isn't even bothering to put on bait, he's just throwing hooks in the water.
Yeah, you know I'd buy that if he wasn't an actual true-believer. It's not bait if you're dead-ass serious. It's just being an obstinate partisan retard. He just happens to be interacting with a number of like-minded individuals of a different political stripe.
 
I believe both the Nixon and Hunter Biden pardons are unconstitutional but unchallenged. The bottom line is that the President must be aware of the offence against the United States being pardoned.
I believe there's a degree of severability, i.e. simply because a pardon is unconstitutionally broad would not mean the entire pardon would be void ab initio, but only the unconstitutional part of it would not apply.
Yeah, you know I'd buy that if he wasn't an actual true-believer. It's not bait if you're dead-ass serious. It's just being an obstinate partisan retard. He just happens to be interacting with a number of like-minded individuals of a different political stripe.
You can believe in something and troll with it at the same time, or at least exaggerate it for maximum piss-take value. I think @Dyn does this a lot.
I supposes this raises the important question... Would Franklin and Jefferson have put on the Balldo?
No, they both had functioning dicks. The Balldo is for impotent men.
It is a painful turn for Gavin Newsom (right), a Democrat who had grown personally close with President Joe Biden in recent years and had emerged as one of his most vocal defenders.
Gavin Newsom is a gigantic faggot and personifies everything wrong with the Democrats.
 
Could Biden just go and pardon everyone who ever worked for the government agencies for any crimes committed during the past 30 years, and make it so that, if Trump really was livid at the Intelligence Agencies for trying to kill him, he'd technically have no legal ammunition against them?

Yes.
 
At this point HHH isn't even bothering to put on bait, he's just throwing hooks in the water.
He's merely doing the equivalent of writing "n-" on Twitter and then bathing in the screaming outrage of "black Twitter." Why should he provide bait when the audience begs for the hooks alone?
 
Plebbitors: See I told you guys biden is innocent and it's just maggot propaganda !

The reality we live in .... holy shit.
 
I'm totally shocked. Shocked I tell you.

Not really. Most people with braincell knew this was going to happen. Hunter was sacrificial lamb used to try and legitimize the legal cases against Trump. The legal cases didn't work Trump won the election anyway, so Hunter isn't needed anymore now it's pardon time.
 
Idk what people want, honestly.

He pardons his son, he's a hypocrite, he lets his son fry, "neener your sons in prison!".

No win situation with a son like Hunter.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo