Law President Biden pardons his son Hunter Biden - The decision, which was first reported by NBC News, is a reversal for the president, who repeatedly said he would not use his authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence.

Original article: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/joe-biden-issue-pardon-son-hunter-biden-rcna182369



WASHINGTON — Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Sunday night, a reversal for the president, who repeatedly said he would not use his executive authority to pardon his son or commute his sentence.

"I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice — and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision," Biden said in a statement.


Hunter Biden is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 12 for his conviction on federal gun charges. He also is set to be sentenced on Dec. 16 in a separate criminal case in which he pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges in September.

The pardon is expected to cover both his gun charges conviction and his guilty plea.

A senior White House official told NBC News, which was the first to report on the pardon decision, that the president decided over the weekend to grant his son a pardon and began to inform his senior aides Sunday.

The president also spoke about his son's struggles with addiction in his statement Sunday night, saying that his political opponents were trying to "break" him by going after Hunter.

"No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong," Biden said in his statement. "There has been an effort to break Hunter — who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me — and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough."

Biden, 82, is using his pardon power to ensure Hunter Biden does not spend time in jail as he nears the end of his term in the White House and has no future election to face. In recent months, he has said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence.

“I will not pardon him,” he said in June after a jury found Hunter Biden guilty on three federal gun charges.

The president has discussed pardoning his son with some of his closest aides at least since Hunter Biden’s conviction in June, said two people with direct knowledge of the discussions about the matter. They said it was decided at the time that he would publicly say he would not pardon his son even though doing so remained on the table.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters last month that Biden’s position has not changed.

“We’ve been asked that question multiple times. Our answer stands, which is ‘no,’” she said.

Asked Monday whether the president is still committed to not granting clemency for his son, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates said: “The president has spoken to this.” Pressed about whether Biden’s position has changed, Bates replied, “I don’t have anything to add what he said already.”

First lady Jill Biden has also said her husband would not pardon their son.

“Joe and I both respect the judicial system, and that’s the bottom line,” she said in an interview in June.

Hunter Biden’s criminal trial in June was the first involving the child of a sitting president.

Pardoning him after that trial would have ignited a political firestorm for his father, who was campaigning for re-election. Republicans have for years attacked Hunter Biden over his foreign business dealings and accused him and the president of corruption. They have also argued that Hunter Biden was getting special treatment by the Justice Department because of his father’s political power.

GOP criticism reached a peak in July 2023 when Hunter Biden pleaded guilty in a deal with federal prosecutors over the tax and gun charges, which collapsed after a judge raised questions about it. That development led Attorney General Merrick Garland a couple weeks later to appoint the U.S. attorney investigating Hunter Biden, David Weiss, as a special counsel.

Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race in July, but a pardon before last month's election also could have generated political blowback on the candidacy of Vice President Kamala Harris after she took his place on the Democratic ticket.

Together, the 12 counts Hunter Biden is convicted of or has pleaded guilty to carry a maximum prison sentence of 42 years. But the maximum sentences typically are not given out for convictions of these crimes. The Justice Department has said, for instance, that while the tax charges carry a maximum sentence of 17 years, sentences are typically less than that.

Asked in an interview in June whether he would rule out a pardon for his son, Biden answered, “Yes.”

Days later, after Hunter Biden was convicted on federal gun charges by a jury in his hometown of Wilmington, Delaware, the president said in a statement that he would respect the outcome. He then told reporters he would abide by the jury’s decision.

“I’m extremely proud of my son Hunter,” Biden said. “He has overcome an addiction. He’s one of the brightest, most decent men I know, and I am satisfied that I’m not going to do anything. I said I abide by the jury decision. I will do that, and I will not pardon him.”

Neil Eggleston, who was White House counsel to President Barack Obama, told NBC News that “if I were his White House counsel, I would encourage him to pardon his son.” He said he has not been contacted or consulted by the White House about any pardon preparations.

“The clemency power has few limitations and certainly would extend to a Hunter Biden pardon,” Eggleston said.

Eggleston’s opinion echoes that of other former Justice Department and White House officials previously involved in presidential pardons who told NBC News that they thought Biden should exercise this power in advance of the incoming Trump administration.
 
Name one specific offence Hunter Biden was pardoned of.
"specific offence" isn't required in the power of the pardon, or literally any of the caselaw on the subject. The Constitution grants the President the authority of the pardon, and the only restriction is in the case of a conviction by impeachment.

The only way the sixth Amendment could be implicated, is if the pardon conferred a judgement of guilt, and it doesn't.
 
I think a lot of people genuinely believed he'd hold back on pardoning him for everything that could have happened over the course of 11 years and let him at least get in trouble for something so that Hunter would have to spend at least a few months in prison over one of his many charges.

There's also really zero chance he was being treated as a sacrificial lamb, especially when the DoJ was trying to come up with such sweetheart deals that a judge got disgusted and tossed it. It was just semi-possible to view him as one as he wasn't being treated as completely immune from prosecution the way the Bidens thought they should be.

It's part of why Democrats could construct this fantasy of Biden letting Hunter go to prison for a while, since everyone was giving the guy a break when possible so not many were expecting him to spend all that long in prison. Though I think there also is the component of a lot of Dems believing the Bidens really didn't do anything sketchy in Ukraine, so it wouldn't occur to them that Joe might want to make sure there's immunity for anything that might've been dug up.

It's a very grand show they pulled off. He was never going to go to a real prison. They have special prisons for rich and important people. They don't get the same treatment the poor peasants get.

Just look up Martha Stewart and camp cupcake. There was never any real threat to Hunter anyway.
 
"specific offence" isn't required in the power of the pardon, or literally any of the caselaw on the subject. The Constitution grants the President the authority of the pardon, and the only restriction is in the case of a conviction by impeachment.
Cite your sources then. Show me where either the Constitution or a Supreme Court ruling defines an offence as not requiring a specified action and location. Explain to me how federal or state jurisdiction can even be established without a location and specific offense. Because remember, pardons are limited to only federal crimes.

Lastly, please explain where the constitution allows the President to forgive a person for a crime they have no legal standing to try in Federal court.

Cite your sources.
 
NBC still calling Biden "president" when they and many other dem-leaning news outlets were so fast to call Trump "former president" after the last election. Interesting.
 
Biden’s Pardon Has ‘Deeply Disappointed’ California’s Next Senator, Adam Schiff
KQED (archive.ph)
By Marisa Lagos
2024-12-03 19:22:34GMT
California’s incoming U.S. senator, Adam Schiff, said Tuesday that he is “deeply disappointed” in President Biden’s decision to pardon his son Hunter after promising repeatedly he would not.

Schiff, who will be sworn into the Senate on Monday, said in an interview that the pardon opens the door for abuse by future presidents — including President-elect Donald Trump.

“I think it sets a bad precedent that will undoubtedly be abused and probably will be abused in the very near future by the incoming president, who was already citing it in connection with his desire to pardon the January 6th attackers, people who beat police officers and bear-sprayed them,” Schiff told KQED. “And so I think the precedent is going to be a dangerous one.”

The “full and unconditional pardon” that President Biden issued Sunday for Hunter Biden covers nearly 11 years, from Jan. 1, 2014 through Dec. 1, 2024. It effectively erases Hunter Biden’s federal conviction for illegally buying a gun and evading taxes that could have resulted in a prison sentence later this month, and it also prevents prosecutors from bringing other criminal charges related to Hunter Biden’s actions over that time period.

In a statement announcing the pardon, President Biden said his son had been “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,” with charges brought only after his political opponents “instigated them to attack me and oppose my election.” The blanket pardon is “not limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted,” pointing to the president’s fears that future charges could have come under the second Trump administration.

“No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong. There has been an effort to break Hunter — who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me — and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough,” President Biden stated.

Schiff, however, said this decision will only embolden Trump.

“The incoming president doesn’t seem to need a permission slip for anything to break any norm. But I would not have given him the cover of this pardon because he will use that as some rationalization for completely unrelated pardons,” Schiff said.

Schiff said the pardon also sends a terrible message to the millions of American families whose loved ones may have also committed crimes in the throes of drug addiction.

“There was no one to pardon them. There was no one who cut them any slack. This really is a two-tier system of justice, one tier for ordinary people and one tier for people of political influence,” he said.

As a member of the House, Schiff led the first impeachment hearing against Trump and has been a frequent critic of the former president, who has named Schiff as an “enemy of the state” and vowed to seek retribution against the longtime Los Angeles congressman. However, Schiff said he does not believe Biden should use his remaining days in office to preemptively pardon others Trump has promised to target.
 
NBC still calling Biden "president" when they and many other dem-leaning news outlets were so fast to call Trump "former president" after the last election. Interesting.
I’m not American so I can’t speak for you, but I do notice how everyone seems to forget that Biden is still president until a story like this hits the news. A few times I was even surprised he was still alive, to be honest.

As for the Hunter pardon, I do understand it on a personal level, the problem is it should never have come to this if he wasn’t such a shit father. This should also be the “gloves off” signal for the Trump administration going forward and there’s hardly a reason anymore not to pardon the Jan 6th people on day one.
 
Cite your sources then. Show me where either the Constitution or a Supreme Court ruling defines an offence as not requiring a specified action and location. Explain to me how federal or state jurisdiction can even be established without a location and specific offense. Because remember, pardons are limited to only federal crimes.

Lastly, please explain where the constitution allows the President to forgive a person for a crime they have no legal standing to try in Federal court.

Cite your sources.
Ex Parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333 (1866)
"9. The power of pardon conferred by the Constitution upon the President is unlimited except in cases of impeachment. It extends to every offence known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment. The power is not subject to legislative control."

The President has the power to pardon someone before they even step foot into a federal courtroom, such as When Ford pardoned Nixon from the whole Watergate scandal before a single charge had been laid against him. The specificities of the crime do not need to be known before the pardon is granted. As to the state vs. federal issue, it's not an issue, you're just making it into one. If some state has evidence that Hunter committed an offense that violates their laws during the time period layed out in the pardon, they still retain full authority to prosecute.
 
found the way out of the cuckshed, little faggot ?
It's hilarious when the TES regulars peek out of their little bubbles. They really say the darndest things

No, I'm still inside of the cuck shed, laughing at you for being a thin skinned little bitch.

Your mom's black boyfriend won't let me out.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 6712099




Sounds like locking up Hunter Biden will be the new version of locking up Hillary Clinton.
I wonder if Hillary is going to run for office again. My guess is that she will.
Nothing to see here. The sky is blue, the grass is green, a politician always be a lying hypocrite.
You’re telling me politicians would do that? Just lie on the internet?
Franklin and Jefferson were both such utter degenerates they fit right in.
Franklin has the autist face. He’d be a lolcow and probably go by Francine.
 
You mean like how you seem to add the word "unlimited" to the President's pardon power? Read the rest of the constitution.
What other part of the Constitution limits the pardon power?

Other than specifically excluding impeachment, there's no limit to the power.

The pardon power is basically unlimited.
 
Yes and no. This pardon only covers Hunter,
Unless you're um ackhsually-ing me that the pardon doesn't cover "china" I'm not sure what you mean. I only ever talk about hunter.

so you could still other people on these crimes (including Joe), and drag Hunter in as a witness and he can’t plead the 5th as a pardon negates that option.
Technically true but practically laughably optimistic.

Moreover, this doesn’t cover state crimes, so he can be prosecuted for anything he did within a given state.
The post I'm replying to is talking about what the trump admin should do. I know it's a federal pardon which is why I picked an example that would be federal crimes. And again hoping a state is going to prosecute hunter is laughable.

This is a mess, that if he wants Trump could really use to drag the Bidens through the mud with on optics alone.

But mostly this makes the Jan 6 pardons a lot easier for Trump and that might actually be Biden’s intent doing this so blatantly. Because Biden must’ve done this on a Sunday and not a Friday for a reason. He wants this talked about all week.
This is correct and what this will actually amount to. I don't think he's trying to make pardoning the Jan 6th people easier though, he's just trying to fuck up the dems as much as possible out of spite.
 
Cite your sources then. Show me where either the Constitution or a Supreme Court ruling defines an offence as not requiring a specified action and location.
That's not how it works retard. If the term isn't defined, it's given the normal and natural meaning common at the time of writing.
Because remember, pardons are limited to only federal crimes.
No, it doesn't retard, read Article II, Section 2, Clause 1.
Lastly, please explain where the constitution allows the President to forgive a person for a crime they have no legal standing to try in Federal court.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 doesn't require standing in Federal court, you keep adding shit based on literally nothing.
It says it right here. Extends to every offence known to the law
"Every offence known to the law", means every code and subsection the US Congress has enacted into law, not whatever dumb shit is in your brain.
The pardon power is basically unlimited.
Correct. This nigger is so deep into imaginary restrictions, he doesn't understand how the Judicial Branch doesn't touch the powers explicitly granted to the other Branches.
 
I hope Trump drops an equally heavy handed pardon, I hope he pardons everyone in Washington DC on J6. Just a blanket fuck it, only one signature needed. Would be no different than liberal cities letting criminals walk constantly in the past 4 years.
Does this include the glowie that shot Ashli Babbitt? Because that's a pretty heavy blanket pardon.
 
Yep, Mr. Kushner was hilarious.
Was this ever covered on the Farms? Maybe I'm just failing to find it.but there doesn't seem to be much. Is there something criminal about hiring a prostitute to seduce your brother-in-law in and of itself? Because you could almost see that as a favour in showing his sister what her husband was really like.

Or is because she was a witness against him that made it criminal? I wonder how they proved the connection between the two if so. Did he cackle "testify against me, will you? Lights!" when he showed it?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo