‘Powerpuff Girls’ Live-Action Series - Officially Dead

Did the professor really deserve this much character assassination?
Much like straight tomboys, we’re no longer allowed to have good fathers on TV.
It's funny how the show is basically turning the professor into that one asshole colleague he used to have that wanted to exploit the powerpuff girls for money and had nothing to offer on his own.
Once again, that episode will never not be topical so long as this franchise continues to be milked this way. Hell, signing off on a pilot like this sounds exactly like what Dick Hardly would do.
 
I'm 100% certain that the payoff for all this is that Utonium, being every single 'bad black father' trope they could manage taken to absurd extremes...is going to be completely and utterly forgiven by the girls by the end of the show.

The whole point predictably is to undermine those stereotypes with Utonium, in the worst possible way by first EMBRACING THEM FULL-ON.

The retarded part is, by embracing the stereotype, you admit that they're true to some degree. This doesn't have to be a bad thing I do think stereotypes have some truth to them. For example, I believe slaves could only afford things like watermelon, and that's why black people are stereotyped to REALLY like watermelon.

The thing there's a right way and a wrong way to embrace stereotypes. If I made a show that dealt with the watermelon thing, I'd show how its kinda fucked up how black people today are picked at for something their ancestors did for survival. It was watermelons or nothing, not like they had some inherent desire to consume the disgusting green and red fruit.

What the CW did here is equivalent to black people running out with guns and hijacking a watermelon truck while blasting 50 cent. Actually hilariously racist.
Or the usual 'subverted expectations' shit we've been getting about completely blowing up beloved franchises and turning beloved characters into horrible caricatures in an effort to destroy their appeal.
I notice people applaud the ATTEMPT at subverting expectations regardless of if it worked or made sense. That's annoying for obvious reasons.
Once again, that episode will never not be topical so long as this franchise continues to be milked this way. Hell, signing off on a pilot like this sounds exactly like what Dick Hardly would do.

So, his name was Dick Hardly? Cartoons were tons of fun back in the day. Which reminds me, what would professor dick be like in this? A rapist?
 
You want to know who the Professor is? The Professor is someone who, in the movie that told the origins of the Powerpuff Girls, upon being locked up in jail and hated by the entire town because the girls tore up the town accidentally playing tag, was way more concerned about not being able to pick up the girls from school and worried that they’d be alone than anything else.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ODCUJSY-Apohttps://youtube.com/watch?v=lmK_VD9B1qI
Fuck every single person who thought up/approved/agreed with making him the villain.
Goddammit, this reboot is already ruining the original show-- oh, I'm sorry, the sanitized marketing product that prettied everything up and made the characters look like good people for the sake of making a quick buck-- for me. When I see those scenes, I can't help but feel it's all fake. Utonium doesn't actually love the girls. He's only pretending to love the girls so he can make money. This isn't how he actually feels! They're actually just disposable to him! He prettied them up and made them all look good so he can make money!

"Please. They're only little girls who are probably cold, scared, and maybe even... lost."
All lies.

Fucking hell. What am I supposed to do now? (:_(
 
You know, it's things like this that, for me, beg the question: just who the fuck is this show even for?
  • People who grew up on the original PPG? No, because it takes all the necessary steps to shamelessly and unapologetically desecrate what people liked about the old show in the first place.
  • Potential fans looking to get into the franchise? No, because, again, this show is deliberately aiming to be as unrepresentative of the IP as humanly possible.
  • The "woke" crowd? No, because the original show is probably one of the very few legacy properties they actually like, and even they hate seeing their favorite characters get fucked like this.
  • Fans of "so bad it's good" media? No, because aside from the IP it doesn't do much to separate itself from any of the other "edgy reboots" we've been getting these days.
  • Those who just want to see some hot chicks cosplaying as the Powerpuff Girls? ...eh, maybe, but that's a (thankfully) very specific and tiny niche.
At least shit like the Star Wars sequels knew to pander to 40-year-old wine aunts and Reylo fanatics alike, and even the 2016 reboot served as an outlet for pedophile writers to vicariously live out their fantasies. This CW show looks like it has literally nothing to offer to anyone.
Go read The Watch thread on here. That was an adaptation of the Discworld stuff and tells you exactly what to expect. The people involved are trying to pander to the zeitgeist and don't appreciate that not only is it fickle as fuck it will never be happy and is as loyal as a whore that's already got your wallet.
 
That'd be a hard sell given if I read the script correctly, the professor originally wanted to use Chem X on himself to become superpowered Elon Musk.

As in, that is literally how the script describes it, right down to the use of Musk's name.
It's funny to see how much these people fucking love science but still don't get that Musk is an investor, not an inventor.
Alex Kurtzman and his "writers" did the same thing in STD where they namedropped Musk next to the Wright Brothers and Zefram Cochrane.
 
The retarded part is, by embracing the stereotype, you admit that they're true to some degree. This doesn't have to be a bad thing I do think stereotypes have some truth to them. For example, I believe slaves could only afford things like watermelon, and that's why black people are stereotyped to REALLY like watermelon. The thing there's a right way and a wrong way to embrace stereotypes. If I made a show that dealt with the watermelon thing, I'd show how its kinda fucked up how black people today are picked at for something their ancestors did for survival. It was watermelons or nothing, not like they had some inherent desire to consume the disgusting green and red fruit.

That's what pisses me off about these SJW leftist types who rail against ALL stereotypes, because they only focus on the bad ones and ironically become a stereotype themselves for being out of touch with reality and screaming about whatever. Stereotypes are a shorthand mechanism of our own consciousness to categorize what we know about things to better understand them.

For example, the CW: the stereotype of any show on it is that said show is going to be brain dead shit pandering to a minority of a minority.

On the other hand, you have the original PPG themselves because each of the three are in of themselves stereotypes of girls. Blossom is the smart one who is the leader most of the time, Bubbles is the girly girl sweetie of the group, and Buttercup is your rough-and-tumble tomboy who is effectively the complete opposite of Bubbles and vice versa. Stereotypes are not inherently bad. Trying to abolish stereotypes without actually addressing the reason why such stereotypes exist (I.E. the reason black people get negatively portrayed all the time is because they happen to come from really shitty areas with low opportunities to actually improve their lives) is. Its just another form of virtue signaling.

What the CW did here is equivalent to black people running out with guns and hijacking a watermelon truck while blasting 50 cent. Actually hilariously racist.

That sounds like a joke mission from Payday 2.

Bane: "Alright crew, we need to hijack that truck full of watermelons because they're actually hollowed out and smuggling cocaine inside of them for the mafia...wait, is the radio player stuck blasting 50 cent? Whatever, just go! This can't be as bad as the goat job!"

(And for those unaware, there is in fact a Payday 2 mission where you have to get cocaine being smuggled inside goats. It was a crossover with Goat Simulator of all things).

I notice people applaud the ATTEMPT at subverting expectations regardless of if it worked or made sense. That's annoying for obvious reasons.
The equivalent of the participation trophy in this industry.
So, his name was Dick Hardly? Cartoons were tons of fun back in the day. Which reminds me, what would professor dick be like in this? A rapist?
I mean he’s already in the show, his name is Drake Utonium
The CW show is in fact an alt. universe where Dick Hardly and Prof. Utonium actually switched places.

Goddammit, this reboot is already ruining the original show-- oh, I'm sorry, the sanitized marketing product that prettied everything up and made the characters look like good people for the sake of making a quick buck-- for me. When I see those scenes, I can't help but feel it's all fake. Utonium doesn't actually love the girls. He's only pretending to love the girls so he can make money. This isn't how he actually feels! They're actually just disposable to him! He prettied them up and made them all look good so he can make money!

"Please. They're only little girls who are probably cold, scared, and maybe even... lost."
All lies.

Fucking hell. What am I supposed to do now? (:_(

Which really raises questions when it comes to Mojo Jojo, since there is the cartoon episode where he cons his way into making the Professor treat him like a son (and ultimately he is horrified to learn he was responsible for the 'accident' that introduced Chem. X into the girls)

In the CW version, Mojo is a human and was the Prof's assistant...kind of super creepy for the Prof to consider that guy his son. Then again, this version of Utonium is super fucking horrible so creepy is just a drop in the ocean of shit this is becoming.

If we're all discussing the pilot script, I've read it and it's awful. Why is Buttercup a lesbian?
She's the tomboy and all tomboys have to be lesbians. According to these people.
 
I remember a long time ago, I confronted a friend (who became an SJW) and he was railing against Stereotypes.

My response: "So what about positive stereotypes?"

He looked at me like I had seven heads.
 
I remember a long time ago, I confronted a friend (who became an SJW) and he was railing against Stereotypes.

My response: "So what about positive stereotypes?"

He looked at me like I had seven heads.

Apparently he'd never heard of Canada, a country where an entire province is known to be full of rude French people and yet Canada as a whole is jokingly thought of as to be over polite to a fault.
 
I remember a long time ago, I confronted a friend (who became an SJW) and he was railing against Stereotypes.

My response: "So what about positive stereotypes?"

He looked at me like I had seven heads.
See, can't reason with these guys.
 
37718B48-732E-481F-BD88-EA2716132C5B.png
 
Because stereotyping is good now.
This is sadly becoming more true, without any irony.
Betty DeVille was announced to be gay in the Rugrats reboot and articles tried their hardest to paint it as if it was the most progressive thing possible. They’ve even point blank said “Just look at her; she was totes a lesbian from the beginning!”
I swear it’s like the past decade has been nothing but low key trolling.
 
Última edición:
This is sadly becoming more true, without any irony.
Betty DeVille was announced to be gay in the Rugrats reboot and articles tried their hardest to paint it as if it was the most progressive thing possible. They’ve even point blank said “Just look at her; she was totes a lesbian from the beginning!”
I swear it’s like the past decade has been nothing but low key trolling.

Yes, the happily married-to-a-man woman was tots a lesbian.

What's next? Angelica's mother was a dominatrix because she was bossy?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo