Pornhub will block access for Floridians on Jan. 1 - Restrictions will take place in protest of the state's new age verification requirements.

Restrictions will take place in protest of the state's new age verification requirements.

No one in Florida will be able to access Pornhub, the most trafficked pornography website worldwide, as of Jan. 1.

Officials with Aylo, the parent company to the pornography site, confirmed it will deny access for all users in the state. An email from the company made clear the restriction will happen in protest of new age verification requirements imposed by a state law (HB 3) going into effect in 2025.

“Unfortunately, the way many jurisdictions worldwide, including Florida, have chosen to implement age verification is ineffective, haphazard and dangerous,” reads an email from Aylo. “Any regulations that require hundreds of thousands of adult sites to collect significant amounts of highly sensitive personal information is putting user safety in jeopardy. Moreover, as experience has demonstrated, unless properly enforced, users will simply access non-compliant sites or find other methods of evading these laws.”

The new statute imposes age verification requirements on pornography websites and any other publishers of content known to be “harmful to minors.”

Lawmakers scoffed at the web publisher’s tactic.

“The fact that they’ve chosen to shut down instead complying to ensure that children aren’t accessing their site tells us exactly who their real target audience is,” said state Rep. Chase Tramont, a Port Orange Republican and the prime sponsor for the age verification bill passed this year.

“To be clear, Aylo has publicly supported age verification of users for years,” the email reads, “but we believe that any law to this effect must preserve user safety and privacy, and must effectively protect children from accessing content intended for adults.”

Pornography sites have previously restricted access to content in protest of similar laws. Aylo noted that Pornhub has also tried to comply with laws in other states only to see users in those jurisdictions flock to less reputable sources for titillation.

“We have seen how this scenario plays out in the United States. In Louisiana last year, Pornhub was one of the few sites to comply with the new law,” Aylo’s email reads. “Since then, our traffic in Louisiana dropped approximately 80%. These people did not stop looking for porn. They just migrated to darker corners of the internet that don’t ask users to verify age, that don’t follow the law, that don’t take user safety seriously, and that often don’t even moderate content. In practice, the laws have just made the internet more dangerous for adults and children.”

Aylo reiterated a position it held as Florida’s law was being debated, that age verification requirements should occur at the device-level, such as requirements for smartphone manufacturers to limit access.

“The best solution to make the internet safer, preserve user privacy, and prevent children from accessing adult content is performing age verification at the source: on the device,” the Aylo email reads.

“The technology to accomplish this exists today. What is required is the political and social will to make it happen. We are eager to be part of this solution and are happy to collaborate with government, civil society and tech partners to arrive at an effective device-based age verification solution. In addition, many devices already offer free and easy-to-use parental control features that can prevent children from accessing adult content without risking the disclosure of sensitive user data.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Pornography shouldn't be first amendment protected.

Anyway, everyone here, most people on earth are addicted to it, I try to stop it but I fail.

I don't even care about ethical pornography, it doesn't exist if it does literal brain damage.

Think about someone born 100 years ago, how many people did they see naked?(Without being in a innocent setting like bathing in a river with their family) How many people did they actually have sex with??

Now think about the thousands or hundreds you saw naked and fucking in just a couple months of watching porn, if you're normal enough to not get into shit like hentai or rule 34.
 
I only pummel the pork to GILFs like Nina Hartley, thank you.
OG

Dave Atell used to host a show called "Dave watches porn" where him and some comedian buddies, sometimes porn stars (one of the episodes had Hartley), would come on and watch old porn while giving it mst3k treatment.

Porn has always been sleazy but the difference in the old stuff to the new stuff is like night and day. Listening to the older pornstars tell about their experience in the industry it was damn near wholesome and enjoyable compared to what's churned out now.
 
You're not paying people to have sex. You're paying people to do a film in which they just so happen to have sex
"Your honor I was not paying for Heroin, I was merely paying an actor to give me a bag of heroin on film for my new short film 'buying drugs', yes it was real heroin but I take my craft very seriously"

Why not open up a whorehouse and just have a camera in the corner and charge people to "be porn stars" it's the same shit. The 60s and 70s supreme court made all time worst rulings.
 
So we got two views in this thread:

1. This is going to lead to digit ID's and other censorship. Eventually, you will have to take a blood test to log onto the internet and then be viewed by three feds visiting the Kiwifarms, RDrama and various image boards. Glowies will ticket you for each rude post you make on the internet.

or

2. Porn is bad and run by a Jewish cabal of sexual deviants who want to entice children to watch BBC tranny porn and are constantly getting material from victims and human traffickers. It must be banned, and finally, we can get an internet where it isn't full of gooning retards who are wasting nonstop cash on e-thots and sexual slaves.

So, I have came up with a solution that should make everyone happy! Porn should be visible on the internet, but it has only to be anime porn voiced by fat black dudes! Now, this may sound weird, but hear me out - It doesn't support sexual slavery, just gook slavery to make terrible cartoons, so that would be funny. Also ethots can't make money and finally, it will cause 99% of the viewbase to finally decide if they genuinely want to support that business. Finally, it opens up an economy for fat black people stricken with poverty who have no other economic opportunities.
 
Imagine being so "moral" that you'll let the boot of a nanny state sodomize you and like it. Want to do something about kids getting porn?

BE A FUCKING PROPER PARENT AND EDUCATE YOUR CHILDREN

All of these hands-off parents don't give a fuck about what their kids do or access but when little Timmy wants to cut his dick off or little Brenda wants to get fucked by 1000 dudes in a row, it's always someone else's fault.

Or if you really want to suckle the teat of the Government.


Grant Net Nanny a government contract and make it mandatory to be installed on all software. Then make it mandatory to be educated on how to use it. Nationally. Parents have to present a certificate that they understand the dangers of monitored children and un-montiored internet.

I don't get why anti-establishment religious vigilante weirdos have this USSR grade fetish over government surveillance. Listen, I'm all for defunding and destroying these kike'd up degeneracy factories, I'm more concerned about what this bullshit is going to lead to. needing the government's permission to look at the news overseas, someone decides that today, nobody can visit national geographic or the history channel.com
 
"Your honor I was not paying for Heroin, I was merely paying an actor to give me a bag of heroin on film for my new short film 'buying drugs', yes it was real heroin but I take my craft very seriously"
False equivalence. Purchase of and ingesting heroin is totally illegal in any context whereas having consensual sex with another adult is not.
Why not open up a whorehouse and just have a camera in the corner and charge people to "be porn stars" it's the same shit
I can honestly say I don't know why they don't do that. I guess the clientele don't want blackmail material on them
The 60s and 70s supreme court made all time worst rulings.
Maybe, but I'm kind of of the opinion that prostitution, within limits, shouldn't be illegal. It's legal for two consenting adults to have sex and it's legal to exchange money for goods and services. Ergo...
 
It depends on the enforcement of it. Similar regulations for liquor stores don’t drive people to buy home-brew and moonshine.

Yes, people’s immediate response would be to take to Google and look for other porn sites. However, if Florida actively shuts down or blocks non-compliant porn sites (even rudimentarily) then it will drive consumers towards compliant sites or they will jerk off to softcore porn on Instagram or just give up. If I’m horny I’m not downloading a fucking VPN.
Or they'll develop weird Devientart fetishes like inflation and transformation. These are Florida men and women we're talking about.
 
False equivalence. Purchase of and ingesting heroin is totally illegal in any context whereas having consensual sex with another adult is not.
Retarded semantics. If filming one illegal consensual act magically makes it legal then there is no reason filming another consensual illegal act should not also magically be protected by the first ammendment. After all blending up babies was protected under some bullshit privacy violation the supreme court imagined up. So I should be able to cook meth to feed to people I've diagnosed as ADHD afflicted because they're my patients, isn't that wonderful? I filmed if so it's art and so it's protected by the first ammendment.

I love the retarded judicial system which favors moneyed minorities over the majority which don't want to live in Weimar 2: Electric Boogaloo don't you?
 
Here's your problem: consensual sex is not illegal. Paying for sex is illegal, but here's the thing: you're not paying for sex. You're paying to do a film in which you will have sex
I'm not paying for sex, I'm paying for weed to be exchsnged in a baggy on film.

I'm not paying for slaves. I'm paying for actors to pick cotton at force on film.

I'm not paying for women to be beaten, I'm paying for women to be beaten on film according to Sharia.

All of these things are legal in various places but if you film them by your own logic they should be legal by mere fact they are being filmed.

The truth is that if you were to pay someone to have sex in front of a camera you would be arrested. If you believed porn was simply art then you would be fine with laws making it illegal to profit from it.

Your flaw is assuming legal = moral or frankly good for society. Prostitution is legitimately less bad for society than porn. Porn provides no benefit to society whereas whores at least allow social retards to realize sex isn't everything.
 
Última edición:
All of these things are legal in various places but if you film them by your own logic they should be legal by mere fact they are being filmed.
Your flawed logic is that you are comparing porn, the filming of two people engaged in consensual sex - a legal act - with the filming of actual criminal, illegal activity.

There is nothing illegal about two people having sex together (unless one or both of them are under age or one of them is raping the other, and then that's a different story).
Your flaw is assuming legal = moral or frankly good for society
Nowhere did I make that assessment
 
tl;dr: Age verification in the groomer age™ is... le bad akshually.
This ID age verification bullshit is just a means to an end for censorship. Daddy government doesn't care about your children. All age restricted videos on jewtube in the EU require age verification by sending jewgle an actual photo of your fucking ID, just to watch a youtube video, imagine. You amerimutts are lucky.

The real solution is to just make internet access to minors illegal, in the same way it's illegal for them to drink or smoke.
Beer cans aren't locked behind some ID censor that asks for your social security number, any kid can pick it up and drink it, but it's illegal and you can't sell it to them.

Maybe make it so schools have more computing and IT classes so they're not tech illiterate but that's it, thoughts?
 
I do love how everyone thinks gooners are watching porn, they've been about hentai the last dozen years or so. every zoomer knows the women on tiktok are way more attractive than what you'll see on porn as well, and the women are mainly gooning to what they read on AO3 so you're really only seeing a small percentage of people be affected by this, mainly spics and niggers.
ou amerimutts are lucky.
don't worry we'll be there faster than you know, can't wait to need to upload an id to post to kiwifarms in 2029. people do realize technically anywhere that can let you upload images or videos is a porn site right?
OG

Dave Atell used to host a show called "Dave watches porn" where him and some comedian buddies, sometimes porn stars (one of the episodes had Hartley), would come on and watch old porn while giving it mst3k treatment.

Porn has always been sleazy but the difference in the old stuff to the new stuff is like night and day. Listening to the older pornstars tell about their experience in the industry it was damn near wholesome and enjoyable compared to what's churned out now.
apparently Dave got fucked over hard trying to get the rights to play that porn on his show and/or self produced the show and literally went completely bankrupt and left with nothing when he got canceled. Him joking about being homeless isn't as much of a joke as people think. like all the money he made from being in movies and tv shows and being a top comedian in the 2000s all fucking vanished. He's so poor he literally has been sober for like a dozen years now.
 
They aren't wrong

Pornhub, whatever it might be, is mainstream and visible. It doesn't hide whats on offer there and it does appear to respond to takedown requests and prohibit illegal material.

There are, I have no doubt, far less transparent providers far less amiable towards complaints about revenge porn and the like.

I don't think this is suddenly going to lead to Floridians developing hard kinks, but it is going to drive the market into less regulated corners.
Did Project Veritas catch a Pornhub exec talking about targeting children with LGBT porn specifically?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo