pinkpillfeminism WGTOW

There are some legitimately unfuckable people out there and some are women.

Elliot Rodger was one, and it had nothing to do with his aesthetic qualities, it had to do with his horrifyingly entitled attitude, and raging narcissism. And there's absolutely unfuckable women out there, but if you took a genuinely ugly man, and a genuinely ugly woman, washed them up, and announced that they wanted to have sex, the line for the woman would vastly eclipse the line for the man.

It's a cliche that gay men are vastly more promiscuous than lesbian women.
 
I
Elliot Rodger was one, and it had nothing to do with his aesthetic qualities, it had to do with his horrifyingly entitled attitude, and raging narcissism. And there's absolutely unfuckable women out there, but if you took a genuinely ugly man, and a genuinely ugly woman, washed them up, and announced that they wanted to have sex, the line for the woman would vastly eclipse the line for the man.

It's a cliche that gay men are vastly more promiscuous than lesbian women.
It’s a cliche because it’s true.
 
I don't get this, isn't this just old school radfems/lesbian separatism reskinned with incel/MGTOW terminology? Why do they hate MGTOW when they stole all their terminology from them?

If I were to guess, I'd say that they see the MRA and MRA-adjacent groups gaining traction through use of memorable terminology and wanted to get in on that action.

The only part of the radfem movement that has any meaningful prominence nowadays is TERFs, and they're really more of a single-issue group, so the radfems that aren't singularly obsessed with preventing the "trans intrusion into female spaces" are kinda a dying breed. I very much doubt they like MGTOW or incels, or agree with any of their philosophies, but they've been unquestionably more successful getting people to join their groups.
 
I think being critical of groups of people helps them improve.
If you're on the defense about something, it's less likely that they will be open to the idea of criticism and change.

I like hearing what people have to say because it's the stuff that triggers a knee-jerk response that helps people change the most.

Don't like being called fat? Do something.
Don't like stereotypes? Break the mold and don't worry about other people.
Don't like being told something? Figure out why it hurts.

If something doesn't apply, let it pass you by.
If it fits, let it sit.

Nah, people don't improve from criticism. People that want to improve usually don't need to hear it anyways; they are already working on it. And those that do need to improve have also heard it before and they have invented their own coping mechanisms to not have to take the advice to heart.
 
If I were to guess, I'd say that they see the MRA and MRA-adjacent groups gaining traction through use of memorable terminology and wanted to get in on that action.

The only part of the radfem movement that has any meaningful prominence nowadays is TERFs, and they're really more of a single-issue group, so the radfems that aren't singularly obsessed with preventing the "trans intrusion into female spaces" are kinda a dying breed. I very much doubt they like MGTOW or incels, or agree with any of their philosophies, but they've been unquestionably more successful getting people to join their groups.

I don't think people are joining MRA groups, I think people are genuinely seeing how incredibly toxic the Post-Modernist/Cultural Marxist/Indentitarian versions of feminism and SocJus are, and abandoning those groups. Association with feminism has been on the decline for at least 20 years, in most western countries, outside of indoctrinates that have been brainwashed in public education and post-secondary institutions.

Nah, people don't improve from criticism. People that want to improve usually don't need to hear it anyways; they are already working on it. And those that do need to improve have also heard it before and they have invented their own coping mechanisms to not have to take the advice to heart.

Funny how modern feminists (at least, the "All men are bad" ones) don't seem to realize that constantly berating people for their genitals is -

  • sexist
  • counterproductive, at best
  • liable to produce reactionary responses, at worst
Mind you, these are the same smooth-brains that insist that any deviation from the latest dogma is automatically heresy, and heretics must be (socially) burned at the stake... or at least, subjected to a Maoist "struggle session."

Anyways, let's get back to laughing at the chonky femcels.
 
It’s a cliche because it’s true.
Ummmm.. that's some bigoted shit right there.

Let's see what Bing has to say.
1577047961682.png

One assumes the numbers will be the same on the other side of the pink curtain.
1577048000772.png

Well, clearly the results here are inconclusive. And, I'm sure the fact that 'gay bed death' returns any results at all is not related to homosexual men using it to describe a situation where they become bored with monogamy and go out and commit sodomy with random guys. Not. At. All.
 
Don't we already have WGTOW but it's just called third wave feminism?
No. That would be second-wave. But they didn't get off their asses and build houses exactly. Third-wave just wants man-slaves permanently in family courts and not give up feminine innocence. When I was a dumb liberal back in my day (2000), I thought they really had a solid point if they could do it better and without men.


Is it just me or does every subreddit/movement that attempts to mimic, imitate, or mock Incels/ColorPills/MGTOWs turn out to be even more pathetic than the movement that it's mocking? I've seen it with /r/IncelTears and I've seen it with /r/femcels, so I kind of know what to expect at this point.
That is similar logic to making a copy of a first copy of an old VHS tape on CRT tvs.
 
Ummmm.. that's some bigoted shit right there.

Let's see what Bing has to say.
Ver archivo adjunto 1063507
One assumes the numbers will be the same on the other side of the pink curtain.
Ver archivo adjunto 1063509
Well, clearly the results here are inconclusive. And, I'm sure the fact that 'gay bed death' returns any results at all is not related to homosexual men using it to describe a situation where they become bored with monogamy and go out and commit sodomy with random guys. Not. At. All.

I’m posting on Kiwi Farm’s, that automatically makes me a bigot and mass murderer of Tran’s, Furrie’s and any other group of perv’s that have been welcomed underneath the LGBTQ+ umbrella.
 
There are a lot of unfuckable women.

More often than not the women make themselves insufferable enough that no one wants to fuck them. Not even about looks or hygiene or whatever.

I don't think there are a lot of unfuckable women. The only thing that's making the insufferable ones unfuckable is that guys aren't sure if the sex will be good enough to make up for how insufferable she is. If they were like "let's go home and fuck, now" they'd have a decent success rate. Heck even hamplanets can get laid if they're aggressive enough about it.

Patrice O Neal said it best. Women will say about a guy, sometimes even their partner, I like you, I love you, but I don't really want to fuck you (they'll say it in a nicer way). They're essentially saying: you're lovable. You're just not fuckable. And the reverse is true for some women. They're fuckable. They's just not likeable.
 
If they are any good at self-improving, then they no longer need a faggy movement like that to tell them what to do. They would soon improve to some level of self-determination instead of letting anonymous online people guide their life decisions.

It's one of the few movements where I have not been able to find any examples of merit.
That's because you look in the wrong places, Raging Golden Eagle is one of the most practical and helpful MGTOWs that I found around, most notable advice he always give is to have an economical plan B, learning a trade skill like plumber and use it to pay for your true goals or check your bride's background before saying yes (I was surprise to learn how many women marry only to get their husbands to pay their art degree loans) among some of the things he always say.

I can only guess that you run around the equivalent of the channel awesome atheists, those are real speds.
 
This thread demonstrates how men aren't the only ones capable of being thirsty, entitled whiny losers.
 
foids mad

Heh, I'm glad I have one of the crazy quotes of greenteaapplepie as my byline. The one where she said that historically the only reason there were men is because men forced women to proliferate the y chromosome.

I looked into a couple of more posts to find some funny stuff, but I have the same experience as when I look into MGTOW stuff. It just makes me sad and empathic toward their plight, even as they rage against the bad hand they were dealt by nature and everyone who gets near them.

uglygal.PNG

uglygal2.PNG


I never really bought the "ugly jealous woman" type who is all about being anti-rape in a ridiculous manner, but I'm beginning to believe when I read these posts.
 
Sorry to necro this thread, but have anyone else noticed /r/FemaleDatingStrategy repeatedly hitting the front page? The entire subreddit is a genderswapped /r/TheRedPill mixed with a bit of /r/Braincels, and while all the male-oriented subreddits like that have been quarantined or banned, this is evidently allowed to proliferate. Take a look at this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDati...ou_earned_my_respect_by_not_sleeping_with_me/
female dating strategy 1.png

Is this a psyop or what? Like, how is this tolerated on a site that's explicitly moved away from their free speech roots to ban the exact same shit when it's said by men about women? I seriously get glowie vibes from this; maybe it's just latent schizophrenia, but I can't help but feel there's ulterior motives behind turning a blind eye to content that's just "opposite sex bad". They did this for YEARS with the other subreddits too, but now there's a double standard that evidently allows women to get radicalized against men. Not enough negative media coverage I guess. Can't wait for Ellen Rodger's shooting spree to eliminate frat bros! :^)
 
Sorry to necro this thread, but have anyone else noticed /r/FemaleDatingStrategy repeatedly hitting the front page? The entire subreddit is a genderswapped /r/TheRedPill mixed with a bit of /r/Braincels, and while all the male-oriented subreddits like that have been quarantined or banned, this is evidently allowed to proliferate. Take a look at this thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDati...ou_earned_my_respect_by_not_sleeping_with_me/
Ver archivo adjunto 2351299
Is this a psyop or what? Like, how is this tolerated on a site that's explicitly moved away from their free speech roots to ban the exact same shit when it's said by men about women? I seriously get glowie vibes from this; maybe it's just latent schizophrenia, but I can't help but feel there's ulterior motives behind turning a blind eye to content that's just "opposite sex bad". They did this for YEARS with the other subreddits too, but now there's a double standard that evidently allows women to get radicalized against men. Not enough negative media coverage I guess. Can't wait for Ellen Rodger's shooting spree to eliminate frat bros! :^)
Men bad women good.

Become a woman.
 
I thought women going their own way was radical feminism or separatist feminism.

Coming up with WGTOW totally rips of MGTOW and is like 50 years too late because that philosophy already exists in the above forms of feminism. They are just repackaging radical and separatist feminism with MGTOW slang.

Edit: Pink pill is literally radical lesbian separatism. Just call it like it is...radical lesbian separatism, but that ain't catchy to Millenials.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo