Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
I feel like such a bad person but ffs if there ever was a breeding ground for a female Elliot Rodger this would be it. I do believe most of these posters are just LARPing incel dudes but all it's going to take is one legitimately insane fat chick reading this stuff to go on a killing spree at some muscle-dummy gym in California. Definitely will be keeping an eye on this group.
Incels and MGTOW are defined by their weak wills and lack of desire to do anything, really.
Take that mentality and apply it to women with chips on their shoulders and mass media eager to make excuses for their actions is a recipe made in pandemonium.
Is it just me or does every subreddit/movement that attempts to mimic, imitate, or mock Incels/ColorPills/MGTOWs turn out to be even more pathetic than the movement that it's mocking? I've seen it with /r/IncelTears and I've seen it with /r/femcels, so I kind of know what to expect at this point.
I feel like such a bad person but ffs if there ever was a breeding ground for a female Elliot Rodger this would be it. I do believe most of these posters are just LARPing incel dudes but all it's going to take is one legitimately insane fat chick reading this stuff to go on a killing spree at some muscle-dummy gym in California. Definitely will be keeping an eye on this group.
Incels and MGTOW are defined by their weak wills and lack of desire to do anything, really.
Take that mentality and apply it to women with chips on their shoulders and mass media eager to make excuses for their actions is a recipe made in pandemonium.
They had a post about this. It said that when men get sad they go on killing sprees and when women get sad they get help and take their meds. This is because from childhood they are taught to deal with stuff and process it, unlike men who just bottle things up and take it out on others.
When will women finally understand that they can't just re-use the strategy from 2nd grade of taking something funny that someone else said, changing a few words, and trying to pass it off as a new and wholly original funny thing?
People keep confusing MGTOW with incels, MGTOW existed even before the term was coined, ever seen that old ass grandpa sitting on a bench with a whiskey on one hand and puffing a cigar enjoying life, no wife around due divorce or death? that's was an MGTOW, I have no idea why suddenly they decided to make a label for it but in the last decades most men like that have gone through nasty divorces so they just say fuck it only to relations, not to sex, the movement is not anti-women, it's anti-compromise.
All this makes it more hilarious because lumping MGTOW with incels makes them rage fucking hard and this female incels copying the nomenclature with their poor understanding make things worst for all three groups.
I don't think so. That man is just sitting there smoking his cigar. He isn't "men going their own way". He is just going his own way.
MGTOW is as the name implies a movement. Not for man, but for men. It takes a special kind of person to think: "other men should do this too!"
And judging by the content mgtow produces, it is exclusively the lowest status males, the most drudging and boring content. Nothing in the movement is about challenging yourself, or learning useful skills, or lifestyle improvement, or anything productive.
It is just feminism for men. But then without the political/social issues part that seperates them from MRA's. Both are massive failures, but the latter at least has some laudible ideals, if not a complete incompetency at achieving them.
Both suffer from the fact that they can't do what feminists can:
1. they can't play people's heartstrings because nobody cares that much about helping men as they do about helping women
2. They can't go naked for attention
3. There is no institutional backing / elites benefiting from their existance
This is both funny and a good thing to show incels, should they believe it, that women can be just as pathetic as them. Though I haven't heard of a femcel physically harming men yet.
Remember that radfem lesbian back in the 70's who wrote the SCUM Manifesto and shot Andy Warhol?
I'm honestly surprised we haven't already had a Millennial equivalent of her in the insanity of Current Year.
Unless the SJW zeitgeist dies out early, I wouldn't be surprised if we see some radfem or an unhinged lefty troon do some fucked-up mass shooting for political reasons (as opposed to Dayton, which was an apolitical spree killing even though Connor Betts was a lefty)
We already had the STEM High School shooting in Colorado this spring, which was done by an SJW soyboy and a FTM troon, but there weren't enough casualties to be legally considered a mass shooting, so it was fairly easy to memory hole.
The only thing more pathetic than incels are femcels who try to adopt the imagery and terminology of incels.
This is both funny and a good thing to show incels, should they believe it, that women can be just as pathetic as them. Though I haven't heard of a femcel physically harming men yet.
Am I the only one who thinks that these women attempting to copy MGTOW stuff is hilariously ironic? Like, way to prove to the MGTOWs that women don’t just leech of the ideas and ‘success’ of men. It’s almost poetic.
Another thing is that we already had this kind of thing with your general radical-feminist and the like. These people aren’t breaking new ground whatsoever.
I guess what I’m trying to get at is, why does this exist? If it’s an attempt to parody MGTOW, it isn’t that good of one. And, call me a cynic, but I think most of the posts aren’t parody at all. I think a good amount of them take it seriously.
Am I the only one who thinks that these women attempting to copy MGTOW stuff is hilariously ironic? Like, way to prove to the MGTOWs that women don’t just leech of the ideas and ‘success’ of men. It’s almost poetic.
Another thing is that we already had this kind of thing with your general radical-feminist and the like. These people aren’t breaking new ground whatsoever.
I guess what I’m trying to get at is, why does this exist? If it’s an attempt to parody MGTOW, it isn’t that good of one. And, call me a cynic, but I think most of the posts aren’t parody at all. I think a good amount of them take it seriously.
If it's an attempt to parody MGTOW you'd think the MGTOWs would have spotted it by now and REEEEE'D about it in some fashion. Anyone care enough to go looking to see if there are any reactions on MGTOW spaces to this trainwreck?
If it's an attempt to parody MGTOW you'd think the MGTOWs would have spotted it by now and REEEEE'D about it in some fashion. Anyone care enough to go looking to see if there are any reactions on MGTOW spaces to this trainwreck?
And yet, the subreddits' rules about no trans-women is very clear, as is their trans-exclusionary attitude.
Women =/= feminists, but sure, let's break this down.
Women are the majority of the voting population in pretty much every western country, and the cliche of "happy wife, happy life" is a cliche, for a reason - men that are married or in relationships will do a LOT to keep the woman in their life happy. Fact of the matter is, one of the remaining contentious political issues is abortion, and women continue to be split on it, and I'm unaware of especially many issues where the opinions are solely and heavily divided based solely on sex.
And it's not a fucking patriarchy if women can run for office, are equally as likely to be elected as men (when they run), and the majority of voters are women. You know WHY women don't run as often as men? Because sociopathy is highly correlated with political office, and women are less likely to be sociopathic.
I've been saying for a long-ass time that the difference between political lesbianism and MGTOW is that the latter aren't claiming they hate the other sex so much they'll go gay, to make some kind of statement.
Depends on which mgtow; the ones that are actually dedicated to self-improvement (I.E. - the ones that aren't legitimately whining incels) would hammer the shit out of all the angry harley-riding whales.
Ignoring the fact that feminism has been a thing for sadly almost a century now, is it really wise to try and emulate an opposing movement which rapidly devolved into an lolcow factory?
Declaration of Sentiments at Seneca Falls was 1848, and it's widely considered to be the birth of the feminist movement, so the movement has been around for about 170 years. Interestingly, there were men that were functionally mgtows back in the 1920's, but they have no direct connection to modern mgtows or MRAs.
Edit to ensure I get all the puzzle pieces awarded.
I'm not sure. I've been looking into greenteaapplepie69 and they seem like they're a depressed 19 year old with a less than stellar love life. It's quite sad and I wish her the best. They should get some hobbies and get out more so she hopefully becomes less of an extremist and meets someone nice. Below are some links of interest.
The FBI and CDC don't track "forcible engulfment" in the same statistical category as "forcible rape", they track it as "other sexual assault." Please stop being statistical and logically illiterate, Mz GreenTeaApplePie69
This is both funny and a good thing to show incels, should they believe it, that women can be just as pathetic as them. Though I haven't heard of a femcel physically harming men yet.
They had a post about this. It said that when men get sad they go on killing sprees and when women get sad they get help and take their meds. This is because from childhood they are taught to deal with stuff and process it, unlike men who just bottle things up and take it out on others.
Honestly, I enjoy the collateral damage every time someone says "women are ..." in a thread like this. You just know there's a couple of lasses reading it taking it personally. It's like when MRA's go on about "not all men!", as if going on the defensive does anything helpful.
If they are any good at self-improving, then they no longer need a faggy movement like that to tell them what to do. They would soon improve to some level of self-determination instead of letting anonymous online people guide their life decisions.
It's one of the few movements where I have not been able to find any examples of merit.
Honestly, I enjoy the collateral damage every time someone says "women are ..." in a thread like this. You just know there's a couple of lasses reading it taking it personally. It's like when MRA's go on about "not all men!", as if going on the defensive does anything helpful.
I think being critical of groups of people helps them improve.
If you're on the defense about something, it's less likely that they will be open to the idea of criticism and change.
I like hearing what people have to say because it's the stuff that triggers a knee-jerk response that helps people change the most.
Don't like being called fat? Do something.
Don't like stereotypes? Break the mold and don't worry about other people.
Don't like being told something? Figure out why it hurts.
If something doesn't apply, let it pass you by.
If it fits, let it sit.
I have, but it's seriously amongst men that aren't busy caterwauling about any movements, in much the same way that "actual activists" aren't the people virtue-signalling on social media, but the ones volunteering in soup kitchens, and the like.
Most TERFs seem quite capable of getting a man and making sure he stays in line, if that's their cup of tea. Obviously, making a man do what they want him to do is a long way from remaking society. This lot really do seem akin to MGTOWs- plenty of resentment there.
Well yes, but that doesn’t disprove my point. I’m sure r/actuallesbians started out full of ‘true and honest’ XX lesbians and look at how that’s turned out.
Well yes, but that doesn’t disprove my point. I’m sure r/actuallesbians started out full of ‘true and honest’ XX lesbians and look at how that’s turned out.
I'm pretty sure there was a "/r/ForeverAloneWomen" sub, and it got invaded by thirsty dudes that conclusively proved that "when it comes to having sex, men need a place, and women need a reason." IIRC, the sub had to go private, because there were so many guys willing to simp for femcels.
I'm pretty sure there was a "/r/ForeverAloneWomen" sub, and it got invaded by thirsty dudes that conclusively proved that "when it comes to having sex, men need a place, and women need a reason." IIRC, the sub had to go private, because there were so many guys willing to simp for femcels.
