I'm so over talking about Wayland. It's just a failed project in my mind and I don't care if people disagree. I'm just going to keep using X11. Nothing I rely on is even talking about removing X11 support. It fits my use case perfectly, unlike Wayland.
Despite the insistent credentialism of the Wayland devs, they've made poor decisions at every turn. Wayland is fundamentally flawed as a concept. The "perfect frame" obsession. The decision to ignore explicit sync until it became impossible to ignore the technical reality of modern graphics APIs. Wayland still can't present a cursor on the screen without it feeling like soupy shit. WDDM doesn't have this problem, Quartz doesn't have this problem and they're both "tear free". X11 doesn't have this problem either. Check out my benchmark:
https://gitgud.io/CrunkLord420/crunkbench
Wayland is the biggest boondoggle in the history of FOSS. It's so easy to come up with conspiracies about how Red Hat intentionally pushed this shit to hold the Linux desktop back. The alternative is just ego and incompetence. There should be books written about this. The meme about Wayland being a glorified "kiosk display server" feel on point.
PS. smdh at people arguing with certified code contributor
@dec05eba