John Hazbin
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 11 de Mar, 2026
The "hidden room" off Jackson's master bedroom was actually a fortified safe room where police executing search warrants found normal adult playboy magazine pornography and legally published art books by Jock Sturges and David Hamilton, but no illegal child pornography (despite the persecution swearing to god that he had some). This evidence was fully presented to a jury during his 2005 criminal trial, where his defense successfully argued the room was simply a secure vault for valuables and personal safety, ultimately resulting in his acquittal on all charges.
Post by troyfreeman
It’s a document of the prosecutions evidence that was completely debunked by the defense without even posting the defense's response to it.
Michael Jackson had thousands of books in his house. They found a couple best selling books that had pictures of nude children playing in water and confiscated ANYTHING that had pictures of anyone nude or semi-nude. If it was chiild porn, he would've been convicted of it during the very trial they submitted this evidence to.
'' What is usually used against Jackson as “child porn” or “child erotica” on those Internet gossip blogs and tabloids are legal art books and art photography that have been found in Jackson’s home. To convince their unsuspecting readers these gossip blogs often use a prosecution motion filed on January 18, 2005 as “evidence” [3]. Remarkably in Internet folklore it is often circulated as a list of “child pornography” that was found in Jackson’s home, when not even the prosecution claimed it was. Most of these art books and magazines do not even have children in them, but the prosecution seemed to have confiscated anything with a nude or semi-nude person in it. ''
'' Police extensively searched Jackson’s premises both in 1993 and in 2003 and there was nothing illegal found, not in physical or digital format (ie. on computers). In actuality, when the police searched Jackson’s presmises in 1993 they stated**:** “the search warrant didn’t result in anything that would support a criminal filing**” [2]. Nor did they find anything illegal in 2003.** Child pornography is illegal to possess and the possession of it is a crime in itself, so had there been any child pornography found in Jackson’s possession he would have been charged with that crime and he was never even charged with such a crime, let alone convicted of it. ''
'' Since the two books are vintage books and sequels to each other it is possible that they both were gifts from the same fan who inscribed one of them. They contain pictures of boys in various situations by different photographers, including pictures taken during the filming of the 1963 Lord of the Flies movie. They do include nude photographs of children, but the photographs are not pornographic or sexual. They show the children in various non-sexual activities, playing, swimming etc. The third book, that was confiscated in 1993 In Search of Young Beauty: A Venture Into Photographic Art (Charles Du Bois Hodges, 1964) which contains both boys and girls, mostly dressed, but some nude or semi-nude. All three of these books are in the United States’ Library of Congress [13]. ''
Source: https://themichaeljacksonallegation...er-been-found-in-michael-jacksons-possession/
Sources for the chapters I quoted:
[2] Jim Newton and Sonia Nazario – Police Say Seized Tapes Do Not Incriminate Jackson: Investigation: Officials continue to interview children in connection with molestation allegations. (Los Angeles Times, August 27, 1993)
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-27/news/mn-28516_1_jackson-case
[3] Plaintiff’s Request to Admit Evidence of Erotic Materials to Demonstrate Defendant’s Intent, Plan, Scheme and Motive (January 18, 2015)
https://themichaeljacksonallegation...016/12/january-18-2005-prosecution-motion.pdf
[13] The Boy: A photographic essay in the US Library of Congress:
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId=1547&recCount=25&recPointer=0&bibId=8457502
Boys Will Be Boys! in the US Library of Congress:
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId=1539&recCount=25&recPointer=1&bibId=6595584
In Search of Young Beauty – A Venture Into Photographic Art in the US Library of Congress:
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/searc...l&place=all&type=all&language=all&recCount=10
It’s a document of the prosecutions evidence that was completely debunked by the defense without even posting the defense's response to it.
Michael Jackson had thousands of books in his house. They found a couple best selling books that had pictures of nude children playing in water and confiscated ANYTHING that had pictures of anyone nude or semi-nude. If it was chiild porn, he would've been convicted of it during the very trial they submitted this evidence to.
'' What is usually used against Jackson as “child porn” or “child erotica” on those Internet gossip blogs and tabloids are legal art books and art photography that have been found in Jackson’s home. To convince their unsuspecting readers these gossip blogs often use a prosecution motion filed on January 18, 2005 as “evidence” [3]. Remarkably in Internet folklore it is often circulated as a list of “child pornography” that was found in Jackson’s home, when not even the prosecution claimed it was. Most of these art books and magazines do not even have children in them, but the prosecution seemed to have confiscated anything with a nude or semi-nude person in it. ''
'' Police extensively searched Jackson’s premises both in 1993 and in 2003 and there was nothing illegal found, not in physical or digital format (ie. on computers). In actuality, when the police searched Jackson’s presmises in 1993 they stated**:** “the search warrant didn’t result in anything that would support a criminal filing**” [2]. Nor did they find anything illegal in 2003.** Child pornography is illegal to possess and the possession of it is a crime in itself, so had there been any child pornography found in Jackson’s possession he would have been charged with that crime and he was never even charged with such a crime, let alone convicted of it. ''
'' Since the two books are vintage books and sequels to each other it is possible that they both were gifts from the same fan who inscribed one of them. They contain pictures of boys in various situations by different photographers, including pictures taken during the filming of the 1963 Lord of the Flies movie. They do include nude photographs of children, but the photographs are not pornographic or sexual. They show the children in various non-sexual activities, playing, swimming etc. The third book, that was confiscated in 1993 In Search of Young Beauty: A Venture Into Photographic Art (Charles Du Bois Hodges, 1964) which contains both boys and girls, mostly dressed, but some nude or semi-nude. All three of these books are in the United States’ Library of Congress [13]. ''
Source: https://themichaeljacksonallegation...er-been-found-in-michael-jacksons-possession/
Sources for the chapters I quoted:
[2] Jim Newton and Sonia Nazario – Police Say Seized Tapes Do Not Incriminate Jackson: Investigation: Officials continue to interview children in connection with molestation allegations. (Los Angeles Times, August 27, 1993)
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-27/news/mn-28516_1_jackson-case
[3] Plaintiff’s Request to Admit Evidence of Erotic Materials to Demonstrate Defendant’s Intent, Plan, Scheme and Motive (January 18, 2015)
https://themichaeljacksonallegation...016/12/january-18-2005-prosecution-motion.pdf
[13] The Boy: A photographic essay in the US Library of Congress:
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId=1547&recCount=25&recPointer=0&bibId=8457502
Boys Will Be Boys! in the US Library of Congress:
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId=1539&recCount=25&recPointer=1&bibId=6595584
In Search of Young Beauty – A Venture Into Photographic Art in the US Library of Congress:
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/searc...l&place=all&type=all&language=all&recCount=10
Didn't realize that Michael Jackson is basically banned at the North Pole due to all the harm he's done to children and families. Keep your heads on a swivel out there, folks—Big Claus is watching!"
).